The mancityfans.net football forum

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..

Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..

Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?

Vhero wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..

Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?

You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes.

Vhero wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..

Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?

You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes. I thought I was posting on a board where people knew shit about footbal, l I forgot where I was posting.. Sorry I won't make that mistake again when making a topic...

Original Dub wrote:

Vhero wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..

Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?

You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes.

ah hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

meh time to move on lol

Vhero wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..

Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?

You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes. I thought I was posting on a board where people knew shit about footbal, l I forgot where I was posting.. Sorry I won't make that mistake again when making a topic...

Mike J wrote:

Vhero wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..

Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?

You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes. I thought I was posting on a board where people knew shit about footbal, l I forgot where I was posting.. Sorry I won't make that mistake again when making a topic...

people on here do, you however.......

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Original Dub wrote:

Vhero wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Vhero wrote:Spurs Just got stuffed 4-2 off Burnley without Gomes... I know its the end of the season but it was the same team that beat us minus Gomes. I honestly thought he was the reason we lost that game and today just proves he is the reason they got 4th over us as this season he has been working miracles for them. I hear he is shit on crosses but seems we couldn't catch him out last week so either he has improved on that part of his game or we are shit at crossing (today would prove the former).

Discuss..

Ok I'll bite. We didn't lose to Spurs because of Gomes but because Spurs were the better side.
Spurs didn't lose to Burnley because Gomes was missing but because they had already beaten City and didn't need the points.

Is that sufficient discussion?

You honestly think that?? You honestly think because they didn't need the points they lost on purpose?? These are fucking professional football players. what a childish fucking argument. I wonder why I bother sometimes.

ah hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

meh time to move on lol

hehehe correct OD.

No Vhero sir I didn't say they lost on purpose but that they didn't need the points.There is a world of difference. Any player today who is in line to play in the world cup would also not be fully commited. It does show what can happen though when a team is up for it like Burnley ( for pride) against a far better side which doesnt put it in.

The on thing I can agree with though is " I wonder why I bother sometimes"

Goaters 103 wrote:Think some people on here need a brief explanation as to what playing with a cigar on means. Spurs season ended in their heads at COMS and they got what they wanted. Once Ars went 3-0 up really quick they had zip to play for; if they had needed that game Gomes woulod have played, end of.

I echo the senitiments of Doug and Slim and do wonder about the sanity of some others on here.

Vhero wrote:

Goaters 103 wrote:Think some people on here need a brief explanation as to what playing with a cigar on means. Spurs season ended in their heads at COMS and they got what they wanted. Once Ars went 3-0 up really quick they had zip to play for; if they had needed that game Gomes woulod have played, end of.

I echo the senitiments of Doug and Slim and do wonder about the sanity of some others on here.

Okay putting aside they didn't need the points for arguments sake that's why Gomes didn't play the rest of the side was still there strongest side. A top 4 side doesn't go from 0-2 up to 4-2 down in 45 minutes without a good reason and I was just trying to put across that reason was Gomes was missing and he is the reason they have been doing so well this season. They obviously went for it I mean they were 0-2 up at half time for christ sake! People are seeing blue here too much to see that facts and actually have a discussion.