Page 1 of 6

Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:22 pm
by ja0005
Just had a text off my mate at Carrington - Gourcuff's dad and his agent are there now.

I've no need to bullshit, and am just passing some info on, before all the abuse starts!

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:23 pm
by Slim
But does your mate?

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:24 pm
by Niall Quinns Discopants
ja0005 wrote:Just had a text off my mate at Carrington - Gourcuff's dad and his agent are there now.

I've no need to bullshit, and am just passing some info on, before all the abuse starts!


To be fair, I've heard that rumour some days back from legit sources.

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:24 pm
by Bingo Lewis
Can't see this being true.
Why would they be at Carrington? Without him? Surely they'd only go to Carrington for a Medical? But he isn't there to have one is he?

Unless we're signing his dad.....

**edit - I don't mean he ain't signing, just can't understand why his dad and agent would be at Carrington.

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:29 pm
by Niall Quinns Discopants
Bingo Lewis wrote:Can't see this being true.
Why would they be at Carrington? Without him? Surely they'd only go to Carrington for a Medical? But he isn't there to have one is he?

Unless we're signing his dad.....

**edit - I don't mean he ain't signing, just can't understand why his dad and agent would be at Carrington.


I think his dad is his agent mate. And manager of Lorient.
Don't necesserily mean he is signing but I get the feeling that bid may have been accepted and they are discussing personal terms. Should those be agreed, there's enough time after the world cup to do the medical (like we ever do those to players) and sign the dotted line.

Gourcouff would make sense as well. Position of need for us and playing for club that would sell should they receive substantial offer. Now all we need to do is to hope he doesn't play well in tournament so that we will not have too much competition.

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:30 pm
by BlueinBosnia
Bingo Lewis wrote:Why would they be at Carrington? Without him? Surely they'd only go to Carrington for a Medical? But he isn't there to have one is he?

Unless we're signing his dad.....

**edit - I don't mean he ain't signing, just can't understand why his dad and agent would be at Carrington.


On this note, do we have designated 'offices' where signings and the like are undertaken? If so, where are they? And if not, I'm guessing Carrington would be as good a place as any to take them, 'cos I'm guessing that CoMS are will be pretty busy, what with now being the prime time to start getting building work undertaken on City Street, relaying the pitch, and general maintenance. Maybe Carrington is just a wee bit less hectic.

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:30 pm
by Bingo Lewis
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Bingo Lewis wrote:Can't see this being true.
Why would they be at Carrington? Without him? Surely they'd only go to Carrington for a Medical? But he isn't there to have one is he?

Unless we're signing his dad.....

**edit - I don't mean he ain't signing, just can't understand why his dad and agent would be at Carrington.


I think his dad is his agent mate. And manager of Lorient.
Don't necesserily mean he is signing but I get the feeling that bid may have been accepted and they are discussing personal terms. Should those be agreed, there's enough time after the world cup to do the medical (like we ever do those to players) and sign the dotted line.

But deals are done at COMS, not Carrington.

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:30 pm
by Tokyo Blue
Bingo Lewis wrote:Can't see this being true.
Why would they be at Carrington? Without him? Surely they'd only go to Carrington for a Medical? But he isn't there to have one is he?

Unless we're signing his dad.....

**edit - I don't mean he ain't signing, just can't understand why his dad and agent would be at Carrington.

Why would his Dad and his agent need medicals?

His Dad was a good player actually.

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:32 pm
by Niall Quinns Discopants
Bingo Lewis wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Bingo Lewis wrote:Can't see this being true.
Why would they be at Carrington? Without him? Surely they'd only go to Carrington for a Medical? But he isn't there to have one is he?

Unless we're signing his dad.....

**edit - I don't mean he ain't signing, just can't understand why his dad and agent would be at Carrington.


I think his dad is his agent mate. And manager of Lorient.
Don't necesserily mean he is signing but I get the feeling that bid may have been accepted and they are discussing personal terms. Should those be agreed, there's enough time after the world cup to do the medical (like we ever do those to players) and sign the dotted line.

But deals are done at COMS, not Carrington.


Could be that they are showing the places (good training facilities means surpricingly much to players), could be that they want to keep it hush hush (that's working well so far obviously!).

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:40 pm
by fangsanalsatan
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Now all we need to do is to hope he doesn't play well in tournament so that we will not have too much competition.

Well, good start for City then as he was abysmal in the first game (bar his set-pieces).

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:43 pm
by Mark (Blue Army)
ja0005 wrote:Just had a text off my mate at Carrington - Gourcuff's dad and his agent are there now.

I've no need to bullshit, and am just passing some info on, before all the abuse starts!


If true he will be a good signing for us.

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:43 pm
by btajim
Here's some info on him as a Player.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoann_Gourcuff

Would his Agent / Dad really be discussing a potential move whilst he's on international duty with France? I would've thought he doesn't need the distraction. And he wouldn't be training until everyone was ready to do it again.

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:53 pm
by Niall Quinns Discopants
fangsanalsatan wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Now all we need to do is to hope he doesn't play well in tournament so that we will not have too much competition.

Well, good start for City then as he was abysmal in the first game (bar his set-pieces).


Abysmal? You are perhaps slightly exaggarating. As with Lahm yesterday.

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:53 pm
by Mark (Blue Army)
btajim wrote:Here's some info on him as a Player.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoann_Gourcuff

Would his Agent / Dad really be discussing a potential move whilst he's on international duty with France? I would've thought he doesn't need the distraction. And he wouldn't be training until everyone was ready to do it again.


Maybe we have already talked to him before the world cup, and he's sent his dad over to check out everything's ok. If his dad comes back with a good report then he will sign after the word cup???

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:55 pm
by Goaters 103
If we are interested in his Father then Mancini definately is looking at going for more experience next season. Perhaps Gourcuff's dad will come in handy in the Europa League?

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:00 pm
by fangsanalsatan
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
fangsanalsatan wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Now all we need to do is to hope he doesn't play well in tournament so that we will not have too much competition.

Well, good start for City then as he was abysmal in the first game (bar his set-pieces).


Abysmal? You are perhaps slightly exaggarating. As with Lahm yesterday.

Did he do anything noteworthy in open play? He's supposed to be some sort of creative playmaker, right? He sure as hell didn't look like one.

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:03 pm
by Dubciteh
rather ozil but wouldnt say no, i do find it hard to believe that this rumour(about his dad at carrington not us signing him) is true....

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:05 pm
by avoidconfusion
Dubciteh wrote:rather ozil but wouldnt say no, i do find it hard to believe that this rumour(about his dad at carrington not us signing him) is true....


This. I don't think Gourcuff was that bad to be honest. The entire French team was bad... their best player was probably Diaby on the day.

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:10 pm
by Niall Quinns Discopants
fangsanalsatan wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
fangsanalsatan wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Now all we need to do is to hope he doesn't play well in tournament so that we will not have too much competition.

Well, good start for City then as he was abysmal in the first game (bar his set-pieces).


Abysmal? You are perhaps slightly exaggarating. As with Lahm yesterday.

Did he do anything noteworthy in open play? He's supposed to be some sort of creative playmaker, right? He sure as hell didn't look like one.


He passed the ball around reasonably well. Granted, not a shining performance but not abysmal either. And in fact, better than just about any other French attacking player.

I was bit baffled though how deep Domenech made him play. He can play central midfied well from what I've seen of him but on friday he was mostly on their own half of the pitch, picking the ball and passing it around rather than bit further up the field where he can look for openings in defence.

Re: Gourcuff

PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:47 pm
by Tokyo Blue
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:I was bit baffled though how deep Domenech made him play. He can play central midfied well from what I've seen of him but on friday he was mostly on their own half of the pitch, picking the ball and passing it around rather than bit further up the field where he can look for openings in defence.


Judging a potential signing for City on what they do under Domenech is pointless, I think. It really does take a reamarkable level of incompetence to make the pool of talent the French have got look as inept as he has managed to do. Not that I am against it, mind, as it does give me some ammunition to throw at my Francophone chums, but it is an amazing feat of almost Frank Clark proportions.