Page 1 of 2

City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:25 pm
by Vhero
Manchester City have signed Slovak starlet Albert Rusnak, according to MFK Kosice.

The Slovakian outfit have revealed that Rusnak, who has previously spent time on trial at Eastlands, has finalised his move to England.

Kosice have agreed an undisclosed deal with City, who have handed Rusnak a three-year contract.

Rusnak is the latest Kosice player to seal a move abroad following on from the likes of Nemanja Matic - who joined Chelsea last summer.

"I have no doubt in my mind that many other young talents we have in our club will also have their opportunity," said MFK Kosice head of football development Allen Bula.

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 32,00.html

Looking about the net seems Sven gave him a trial back in 2007.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:30 pm
by Ted Hughes
If he's any good, with a name like Albert, we can turn him English.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:31 pm
by Wooders
This will be one of the numerous youngster we sign and never hear about again no doubt

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:32 pm
by john@staustell
His age appears to be 'starlet'.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:56 pm
by stockportblue
Where did this story come from?-As I understand it he was at the academy for a couple of yesrs.I have seen him play for the under 16s last season.I thought he had been released and gone to Fulham.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:19 pm
by Vhero
stockportblue wrote:Where did this story come from?-As I understand it he was at the academy for a couple of yesrs.I have seen him play for the under 16s last season.I thought he had been released and gone to Fulham.

I have linked the story SSN are reporting it.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:24 pm
by Burt
Be good to ave a Bert in our squad in my oppinion. That's what we've been lacking since Bert Vierra;o)

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:28 pm
by stockportblue
Vhero wrote:
stockportblue wrote:Where did this story come from?-As I understand it he was at the academy for a couple of yesrs.I have seen him play for the under 16s last season.I thought he had been released and gone to Fulham.

I have linked the story SSN are reporting it.


We signed him 2 or 3 years ago!!!!!-

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:37 pm
by Vhero
stockportblue wrote:
Vhero wrote:
stockportblue wrote:Where did this story come from?-As I understand it he was at the academy for a couple of yesrs.I have seen him play for the under 16s last season.I thought he had been released and gone to Fulham.

I have linked the story SSN are reporting it.


We signed him 2 or 3 years ago!!!!!-

Hahaha if we did there extremly fucking late!

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:41 pm
by stockportblue
Its on the Kosice web site so I assume it must be genuine.It must be nearly two years since I first saw him play for the under 16s.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:37 pm
by bluej
stockportblue wrote:Its on the Kosice web site so I assume it must be genuine.It must be nearly two years since I first saw him play for the under 16s.


I googled him and he appears in this thread -
http://www.xtratime.org/forum/archive/i ... 82920.html

There's an out of date link to Setanta in there which says he was on trial in 2007 like you said.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:53 pm
by Blue Since 76
Looking at the xtratime link, he was named as a City player in April. Heard that today is his 16th birthday, which might explain why he's now 'signed'.

Need info from someone who watches the kids regularly. Pat Rice, perhaps

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:44 pm
by stockportblue
Blue Since 76 wrote:Looking at the xtratime link, he was named as a City player in April. Heard that today is his 16th birthday, which might explain why he's now 'signed'.

Need info from someone who watches the kids regularly. Pat Rice, perhaps


I saw him play for the under 16s last season and the previous season.It came as a suprise reading the thread title as I heard he wasnt being taken on and was going to Fulham.Sometimes clubs chang etheir minds when making a decision of this type.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:13 pm
by blue wine
Got him on facebook :)

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:52 pm
by gillie
With a name like that he sounds like he should be in Corrie lol.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 9:59 am
by Niall Quinns Discopants
Think Doug just mentioned him on Training Topic.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 10:18 am
by Douglas Higginbottom
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Think Doug just mentioned him on Training Topic.


No I think the guy I was referring to is somebody else. I watched the under 16's afew times last and like Stockport blue I think Albert was playing and has been for a while. Certainly there was an Albert and there aren't too many of those around.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 10:41 am
by Niall Quinns Discopants
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Think Doug just mentioned him on Training Topic.


No I think the guy I was referring to is somebody else. I watched the under 16's afew times last and like Stockport blue I think Albert was playing and has been for a while. Certainly there was an Albert and there aren't too many of those around.


Alright. Just thought name sounded similar to the one you mentioned on training topic.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 10:45 am
by lets all have a disco
gillie wrote:With a name like that he sounds like he should be in Corrie lol.


Good solid name is Albert.

Re: City Sign Albert Rusnak

PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:14 am
by the_georgian_genius
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:No I think the guy I was referring to is somebody else. I watched the under 16's afew times last and like Stockport blue I think Albert was playing and has been for a while. Certainly there was an Albert and there aren't too many of those around.


stockportblue wrote:Where did this story come from?-As I understand it he was at the academy for a couple of yesrs.I have seen him play for the under 16s last season.I thought he had been released and gone to Fulham.


We all hear about the U18's side of the academy but seeing as you two watch the U16's are there any decent lads that we should keep an eye on for the next few years to see how they progress in that age group and lower?