Page 1 of 2

Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:03 am
by ross.mcfc
It seems the rumours of us signing him simply wont go away. Given Liverpool financial postion and the lack of clubs who can pay the asking fee it makes sense that if he wants to leave Liverpool we will be the team he joins.

I think we can safely say we dodged one hell of a bullet when John Terry didn’t sign for us last season. Bridgegate aside he was poor on the pitch, rarely fully fit and at the World Cup shown up as a defender who was past his prime and found lacking of any sort of pace once he didn’t have another centre half beside him to do all the leg work. Argueably still a better player than any of our current centre halfs but in 2/3 years time I reckon both Kompany and Lescott will be better players than Terry will be at 33/34. I remember Hughes saying that signing the England captain in a world cup year was about a statement of intent. Even writing this out I am counting my blessings!

I cant help feel this time next year if we don’t sign Torres we will feel the same way. It’s not just his obvious injury concerns but his attitude in general. It was common knowledge he had decided to leave Liverpool if Benitez was still the manager. A fellow countryman who signed him and he couldn’t even give him one bad season. It’s also common knowledge that he all but packed up at the end of the season to save himself for the world cup whilst Liverpool still had a chance of a cup.

I was listening to the Guardian podcast after the semi final where he was rightfully dropped for being out of form. Sid Low who covers Spanish football for them had mentioned that Torres did not warm up before the game or with the subs during the game. Didn’t receive to much attention in any other press but I noticed on my twitter feed that quite a lot of journo’s pointed out that Torres did not the even bother warming up with the team before the game or at half time with the other subs. He come’s onto the pitch at a world cup final and pulls his hamstring. Spain had used all there subs and what had happened if he had been put on earlier and his side were down to 10 men because he thought he was to good to be a sub and pulled a strop. This is one of the great international sides of all time packed with star talent and he cant even be bothered to warm up and made a tit of himself on the grandest stage of them all.

We are talking $50-$60M plus wages for this guy and I just don’t see him worth being worth the risk. People may say we have all the money in the world so what’s the risk but we cant be seen as a place people come to pick up wages and not give a return. He’s not the only striker out there that can bang in 30 + goals a season in average league.

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:11 am
by Mark (Blue Army)
Image

A Picture says a thousand words...

At first I thought it was photoshoped but its not http://www.gettyimages.ie/detail/102808771

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:53 am
by dazby
He tweaked his hammy right at the end. I wouldn't go anywhere near him THIS season.

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:22 am
by Ted Hughes
Torres was warmed up to fuck before he came on last night. They were referring to him warming up throughout the game. Tbf to him & Liverpool I think it's obvious he wasn't ready to be playing but Spain put their own needs before those of the player &the club.

I don't know what his injuries are & how much recovery time he needs but I'm pretty fucking sure he shouldn't have been at the World Cup & it could have set him back. That doesn't mean that he won't get fit but of course it puts into question whether clubs like us & Chelsea should be buying him. That's for the medics to decide, but they got it wrong with RSC so can we trust them?

Imo, Torres is the best when fit. Dzeko can't lace his boots but it's a lot of money to gamble. I suppose our owner can make that decision himself though. If he decides to go for it then fair enough.

Personally I think Torres is a whinging, diving, miserable, cynical, slimey, wanker. I'll be happy for him to go somewhere else or drop dead.

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:36 am
by ross.mcfc
Ted Hughes wrote:Torres was warmed up to fuck before he came on last night. They were referring to him warming up throughout the game.


You don’t pull your hamstring that quickly if you are warmed up properly.

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:45 am
by Dameerto
Only worth it on a pay per play basis - otherwise sod off.

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:51 am
by Ted Hughes
ross.mcfc wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:Torres was warmed up to fuck before he came on last night. They were referring to him warming up throughout the game.


You don’t pull your hamstring that quickly if you are warmed up properly.


He was warming up throughout the game & I'm not sure he did pull his hamstring.

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:50 am
by stinky pete
he reminds me of that little rag shit owen for being injured! no.

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:57 am
by s1ty m
He is made of glass. And he's a bit of a sick note and a tart. I wouldn't want him. What you want is an Anelka-type; has he EVER been injured?

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:11 am
by Vhero
Not worth the risk when there are other viable options right now. If those avenues close then fair enough.

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:14 am
by Dubaimancityfan
No !

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:23 am
by avoidconfusion
I hope we really give up on this one now, not worth the money, injured AGAIN... would prefer us to go for someone like Dzeko who would be cheaper, younger and probably hungrier.

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:32 am
by trueblue64
NO!

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:06 am
by john@staustell
Put it like this:

Squad strikers:

a) Tevez, Adebayor, Dzeko and RSC, OR

b) Tevez, Adebayor, Dzeko, Torres and RSC

Sounds better.

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:11 am
by dick dastardley
john@staustell wrote:Put it like this:

Squad strikers:

a) Tevez, Adebayor, Dzeko and RSC, OR

b) Tevez, Adebayor, Dzeko, Torres and RSC

Sounds better.


you missed out our very own Caicedo!!!

Torres = injury prone

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:15 am
by john@staustell
dick dastardley wrote:
john@staustell wrote:Put it like this:

Squad strikers:

a) Tevez, Adebayor, Dzeko and RSC, OR

b) Tevez, Adebayor, Dzeko, Torres and RSC

Sounds better.


you missed out our very own Caicedo!!!

Torres = injury prone


Well the chairman may disagree of course but from a fans point of view I can't see the problem in adding a 20-goal injury-prone striker to our existing players.

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:17 am
by Beeks
Dzeko is less of a risk and for far less money to be fair...in fact we could get both him and say...Kolarov for the same money as Torres

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:19 am
by john@staustell
IanBishopsHaircut wrote:Dzeko is less of a risk and for far less money to be fair...in fact we could get both him and say...Kolarov for the same money as Torres


I'm adding Torres to Dzeko mate. And Kolarov for that matter.

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:35 am
by dick dastardley
john@staustell wrote:
dick dastardley wrote:
john@staustell wrote:Put it like this:

Squad strikers:

a) Tevez, Adebayor, Dzeko and RSC, OR

b) Tevez, Adebayor, Dzeko, Torres and RSC

Sounds better.


you missed out our very own Caicedo!!!

Torres = injury prone


Well the chairman may disagree of course but from a fans point of view I can't see the problem in adding a 20-goal injury-prone striker to our existing players.


you cant score goals on the stands!!!!

Re: Torres - Worth the risk?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:40 am
by john@staustell
Maybe Dicky but Benitez kept playing him when he should have been recovering. Then he went to the WC when he should have been recovering. If treated properly he'll be fine in 2 or 3 months.