Tuesdays Rag Post Of The Day


RAG1: For me it doesn't really matter. Not every club is blessed with good directors who build sustained success plus that one manager/ group of managers who takes them to the next level, in their past. So if a money man comes along, buys a club and is able to give a club both right now, rather than make them indebted ala Liverpool & United or collapse ala Pompey, I don't see why anyone should complain. It's as if people want success to only be monopolized by clubs with a good past in terms of running and success.
RAG2: For me it's not to do with "complaining". Sugar-daddies exist and have always been attracted to having a football club as their prestige toy, albeit now and in recent past the trend has become much stronger. It's part of the football world: I accept that and I'm happy for my own club to keep on keeping on in trying to compete with it all.
The point for me is that trophies earnt via sugar-daddy investment are worth much less than trophies won by clubs who've done it on their own backs. In other words, for me there's a big element of hollow triumph involved in any success bought by a sugar-daddy.
[strike]WAGS[/strike] RAGS OF THE DAY
