The mancityfans.net football forum

RAG1: stupid man shitty fans.
bunch of class-less clue-less camel shagging pricks.
the only reason players are joining your team is cos they are mercenaries who go there for the cash! they have never dreamed of playing for man city. WHO DA FUCK are man shitty? no history.look at real madrid. on paper they may have a great team but they dont have passion for the club, just a bunch of prima-donnas.

MAN CITY ARE CHANGING THE NAME OF THE TROPHY ROOM FOR THE BEGGINING OF NEXT SEASON…….THEYRE RE-NAMING IT THE ROOM HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

RAG2: A few years out of division 2 a small club with loads of money will become the next Chester when the arabs pull out.

Small club, small menality and if you want young english players; why sell weaver. You dump Distin, Dunne, Bellamy, Ireland and others and buy expensive shite.

In fact the best thing about city is they have brought outt their own brand of gravy dressed in sky blue and white and tied with a small white scarf it is called Laughing Stock.

[strike]WAG[/strike] RAG OF THE DAY

Pricks

IBH - Wherever it is you get this dross from you should post replies telling them where they can view the replies. Perhaps you should also give them some links to various educational establishments where they could learn to spell and construct sentences.

Today's posts don't add much to previous efforts, more of the same old same old recycled history, old jokes and racism. They say that we are a small club and mean nothing to them but still they post this garbage.

If they really don't recognise the significance of the rivalry between the two clubs over the years they are neither football fans or even proper rag fans.

Nobody can deny that they have been the larger and more successful club in the last thirty years and if it were not for the Glazers that may have carried on for the next thirty despite the changes at City. They are now clearly being deprived of money to invest in their squad and that has been their modus operandi for the last decade or more. Whilst some might question the strategy of our owners and management very few people with any modicum of common sense think that the gap between the clubs is not going to change significantly to the point where it may even be reversed.....that said these daily insights into the minds of those on the dark side would indicate that common sense is not all that common over in Salford!

They really are fuckin obsessed aren't they, sad cunts

Bless em, and I thought they didn't care!

and last but not least



Don't do it that's my advice, it is funny how some rag fans don't follow it though.

Tick tock, Tick tock

Dronny wrote:

They're either standing on a slope, or it's windy as hell, or they are socialists.

mr_nool wrote:

Dronny wrote:

They're either standing on a slope, or it's windy as hell, or they are socialists.

Or they're Swedish ;-)

Dronny wrote:

mr_nool wrote:

Dronny wrote:

They're either standing on a slope, or it's windy as hell, or they are socialists.

Or they're Swedish ;-)

Well, that's pretty much the same as being a socialist,i.e leaning to the left. Or at least used to be. Sweden has an election in three weeks,and it looks like there will be a right wing government again. That's the first time since before WWII that a right wing government stays in office after an election....

mr_nool wrote:

Dronny wrote:

mr_nool wrote:

Dronny wrote:

They're either standing on a slope, or it's windy as hell, or they are socialists.

Or they're Swedish ;-)

Well, that's pretty much the same as being a socialist,i.e leaning to the left. Or at least used to be. Sweden has an election in three weeks,and it looks like there will be a right wing government again. That's the first time since before WWII that a right wing government stays in office after an election....

Sorry Nooly, you're going serious and I'm going to bed.

PS. Hope the right wing shit doesn't happen, I'll keep an eye open for the results.......night

Dronny wrote:

mr_nool wrote:

Dronny wrote:

mr_nool wrote:

Dronny wrote:

They're either standing on a slope, or it's windy as hell, or they are socialists.

Or they're Swedish ;-)

Well, that's pretty much the same as being a socialist,i.e leaning to the left. Or at least used to be. Sweden has an election in three weeks,and it looks like there will be a right wing government again. That's the first time since before WWII that a right wing government stays in office after an election....

Sorry Nooly, you're going serious and I'm going to bed.

PS. Hope the right wing shit doesn't happen, I'll keep an eye open for the results.......night

I'm not going serious. But my original post with slopes, wind and socialism was just a stupid way of pointing out that they are all tilted to the left.

And I will vote right, whichever way that is.

AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

There was upset at Old Trafford when BBC Radio Manchester reporter Ian Cheeseman, who normally covers City, turned up at a United press conference wearing a City-branded jacket.

Nice one fella

Good old Cheesie.
...and those rags are becoming such sensitive souls. It's not as if they have no experience or history of being skint. They should be used to it.
I wonder if they'll do as they did in 1910 and hold a jumble sale to raise funds...to which City donated a guinea £1.1s, to help bail them out.

john68 wrote:Good old Cheesie.
...and those rags are becoming such sensitive souls. It's not as if they have no experience or history of being skint. They should be used to it.
I wonder if they'll do as they did in 1910 and hold a jumble sale to raise funds...to which City donated a guinea £1.1s, to help bail them out.

Did you buy a cardy or anything nice John?

blues-clues wrote:IBH - Wherever it is you get this dross from you should post replies telling them where they can view the replies. Perhaps you should also give them some links to various educational establishments where they could learn to spell and construct sentences.

Today's posts don't add much to previous efforts, more of the same old same old recycled history, old jokes and racism. They say that we are a small club and mean nothing to them but still they post this garbage.

If they really don't recognise the significance of the rivalry between the two clubs over the years they are neither football fans or even proper rag fans.

Nobody can deny that they have been the larger and more successful club in the last thirty years and if it were not for the Glazers that may have carried on for the next thirty despite the changes at City. They are now clearly being deprived of money to invest in their squad and that has been their modus operandi for the last decade or more. Whilst some might question the strategy of our owners and management very few people with any modicum of common sense think that the gap between the clubs is not going to change significantly to the point where it may even be reversed.....that said these daily insights into the minds of those on the dark side would indicate that common sense is not all that common over in Salford!

Totally agree. Well said.

Invisible Man Fan wrote:Pricks

Totally agree. Well said.


It would be good to get a link to these posts IBH. I'd like to see what the rest of the rag contingency make of this twallocks. Are they all as deluded? I seriously hope not. Most rags that I know are quite realistic about the situation, though that maybe because I take it upon myself to educate them.

Small club, small menality and if you want young english players; why sell weaver.

First off, shouldn't this end in a "?" ?

Secondly, Weaver? Young? He was 28 and damaged goods when we let him go. He wasn't sold. I love scum who don't let the fact get in the way of an argument.

Can anyone explain to me this no history comment I keep seeing?? 125 years +/-???

The Florida Marlins came into existence in 1992 and have won 2 World Series, no one every accused them of no history on the run up to the first win, which was totally based on money. I guess when you have little hope of being the big team in "Manchester" you have to clutch at the few remaining straws?

Florida Blue wrote:Can anyone explain to me this no history comment I keep seeing?? 125 years +/-???

Apparently, if you haven't won anything in recent years, you have no history. Tis a well known fact. In fact, the only teams with history are Scouse, Scum, Arse and Chelski (who have lots of history over the past few years or so). Just ask Torres. Pompey and Spuds have a little history, but that just confuses things and Blackburn have a tiny bit, but they bought theirs.

City have none unfortunately, as have the English national team and every other club in the football league. That includes Preston North End whose club can be traced back to 1863, were founder members of the league and won the very first title. They must be gutted to have no history, but hey-ho. What can you do?

It's all a matter of yer BCs and yer ADs...
BC is those years before the rags and their cronies blackmailed UeFA to ensuring that the structure and finances were changed to suit their needs...BC...BEFORE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE...This period of football no longer exists and anything that may have happened has been expunged from the records.
AD is those years since the rags had to deny that football ever existed...cos they were shit. AD = AFTER DENIAL.

I am reliably informed that this will all change shortly and BC will be redefined as that period BEFORE CITY ruled the World and AD will be the yearly measure AFTER DUBLIN...when we will win the Europa League.

HOPE THAT CLARIFIES MATTERS FOR YOU FLO.