Page 1 of 1
Bellamy

Posted:
Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:40 pm
by HeyMark
LinkIf true, that definitely would have caused some drama if it had happened. I'd have hated to have seen him wind up at the Scum
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:54 pm
by the_georgian_genius
He's a horrible, vile, bullshitter who not only is a talented player but is a budding politician with his magnificent propaganda skills. Talks a good game and runs around screaming and calling everyone a prick so that the typical english fans will love him as he is showing passion. Meanwhile behind the scenes he is a trouble causer who is a problem for any manager that has ever managed him apart from Uncle Hughes.
The great quote from the interview on 5live is that he bemoans the lack of loyalty in football and this is coming from the man who is at his 9th club at the age of 31!
A great talented player who will never win a major honour in his career because he is a self righteous prat!
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:58 pm
by Goaters 103
If he even thought for a second that City would sell him there he's deluded.
Good player no doubt, but there is a reason he is on his umpteenth club and remains medalless at the age of 31 - quite a feat considering the teams he has turned out for. The fact that he also appears to be posion in a dressing room also doesnt help.
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:51 pm
by BobKowalski
Bellamy is deluded that Taggart would even consider shelling out cold hard cash for a 30+ year old striker with knackered knees. The world and his dog can see that the buying policy is young players with potential and not too heavy on the wage bill.
Christ what a load of bollocks. Entertaining bollocks mind but still bollocks.
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:54 pm
by HeyMark
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/commonwealth_games/delhi_2010/9062905.stmThe radio interview for anyone that wants to listen to it.
A personal reason that the owner refused to let him go to Spurs, what a load of shit
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:57 pm
by gillie
For someone who hates his charity work being mentioned Bellers likes the rest of his life to be in the limelight.He is very much Jeckyll and Hyde imo.
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:57 pm
by Burt
BobKowalski wrote:Bellamy is deluded that Taggart would even consider shelling out cold hard cash for a 30+ year old striker with knackered knees. The world and his dog can see that the buying policy is young players with potential and not too heavy on the wage bill.
Christ what a load of bollocks. Entertaining bollocks mind but still bollocks.
What like Michael Owen?
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:21 pm
by BobKowalski
Burt wrote:BobKowalski wrote:Bellamy is deluded that Taggart would even consider shelling out cold hard cash for a 30+ year old striker with knackered knees. The world and his dog can see that the buying policy is young players with potential and not too heavy on the wage bill.
Christ what a load of bollocks. Entertaining bollocks mind but still bollocks.
What like Michael Owen?
Two points. 1) Owen was on a free. Bellamy would not have been on a free. 2) Owen is on a play for pay deal which is probably why he doesn't play much and Bellers is on £90k a week.
Taggarts buying policy is clear. Young and relatively cheap to buy and not too expensive on the wage bill. Taggart's buying policy does not include 30 year old strikers with dodgy knees on £90k a week. Bellamy is away on Bellers world with this one and pretty muuch everything else he says ie 'Mancini didn't speak to me for 6 months'. I have no idea if Bellers believes the whining shit he comes out with but it is entertaining.
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:33 pm
by gillie
BobKowalski wrote:Burt wrote:BobKowalski wrote:Bellamy is deluded that Taggart would even consider shelling out cold hard cash for a 30+ year old striker with knackered knees. The world and his dog can see that the buying policy is young players with potential and not too heavy on the wage bill.
Christ what a load of bollocks. Entertaining bollocks mind but still bollocks.
What like Michael Owen?
Two points. 1) Owen was on a free. Bellamy would not have been on a free. 2) Owen is on a play for pay deal which is probably why he doesn't play much and Bellers is on £90k a week.
Taggarts buying policy is clear. Young and relatively cheap to buy and not too expensive on the wage bill. Taggart's buying policy does not include 30 year old strikers with dodgy knees on £90k a week. Bellamy is away on Bellers world with this one and pretty muuch everything else he says ie 'Mancini didn't speak to me for 6 months'. I have no idea if Bellers believes the whining shit he comes out with but it is entertaining.
2 words "attention seeker" re Bellers.
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:40 pm
by Burt
BobKowalski wrote:Burt wrote:BobKowalski wrote:Bellamy is deluded that Taggart would even consider shelling out cold hard cash for a 30+ year old striker with knackered knees. The world and his dog can see that the buying policy is young players with potential and not too heavy on the wage bill.
Christ what a load of bollocks. Entertaining bollocks mind but still bollocks.
What like Michael Owen?
Two points. 1) Owen was on a free. Bellamy would not have been on a free. 2) Owen is on a play for pay deal which is probably why he doesn't play much and Bellers is on £90k a week.
Taggarts buying policy is clear. Young and relatively cheap to buy and not too expensive on the wage bill. Taggart's buying policy does not include 30 year old strikers with dodgy knees on £90k a week. Bellamy is away on Bellers world with this one and pretty muuch everything else he says ie 'Mancini didn't speak to me for 6 months'. I have no idea if Bellers believes the whining shit he comes out with but it is entertaining.
Bellers is also out on a free so to speak cos he's on loan. What evidence do you have that Bellers is on 90k per week and do you believe that Owen is on much less than him?
Taggart's buying policy is that "There's no value in the market". That's why he paid more for a player he's never seen (Bebe) than what the yids paid for Van De Vart.
Just a thought mate.
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:49 pm
by rabbit
Sadly, I never want to see this dysfunctional cunt in a blue shirt again.
Does he not fuckin realize that every negative comment he makes shows complete disrespect to me,you and everyone else who shells out a wad or two for supposedly watching players who actually care what it's about to represent City.
Fuck him off to Spurs and get him off the wage bill.
He will play 10 games a season. He will have 3 good games, 3 average games, and 4 shite games. Injured and being disruptive on the bench for the rest.
He may even give the ball away with 20 seconds to go in a local derby that results in a defeat, and then hi 5 Wenger in the next game when Arsenal beat them and qualify for the " TV Champions League". If u know what I mean.
Thats that.
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:05 pm
by BobKowalski
Burt wrote:BobKowalski wrote:Burt wrote:BobKowalski wrote:Bellamy is deluded that Taggart would even consider shelling out cold hard cash for a 30+ year old striker with knackered knees. The world and his dog can see that the buying policy is young players with potential and not too heavy on the wage bill.
Christ what a load of bollocks. Entertaining bollocks mind but still bollocks.
What like Michael Owen?
Two points. 1) Owen was on a free. Bellamy would not have been on a free. 2) Owen is on a play for pay deal which is probably why he doesn't play much and Bellers is on £90k a week.
Taggarts buying policy is clear. Young and relatively cheap to buy and not too expensive on the wage bill. Taggart's buying policy does not include 30 year old strikers with dodgy knees on £90k a week. Bellamy is away on Bellers world with this one and pretty muuch everything else he says ie 'Mancini didn't speak to me for 6 months'. I have no idea if Bellers believes the whining shit he comes out with but it is entertaining.
Bellers is also out on a free so to speak cos he's on loan. What evidence do you have that Bellers is on 90k per week and do you believe that Owen is on much less than him?
Taggart's buying policy is that "There's no value in the market". That's why he paid more for a player he's never seen (Bebe) than what the yids paid for Van De Vart.
Just a thought mate.
You think City would loan Bellers to taggart and pay his wages and - actually you lost me with that one. Owen was a free agent and out of contract. Bellers isn't out of contract so if Taggart wanted him he would have to pay a fee and taggart ain't paying a fee for a 30 year old striker with f**ked knees on a hefty wage.
No one can take this seriously. Add the fact that both clubs have denied it so yes I call it bollocks and yes I believe Owen is on a much lower basic than Bellamy. And Bebe will be on a much lower basic than Owen for what its worth.
I don't get the training regime bit either. Bellers was fit for most of last year and came back for pre season rested up and raring to go and looking in good shape. Moves to Cardiff. F**cks up his knees and its all City/Mancini's fault. Yeah ok Craig.
I swear Mancini will get blamed for global warming next with St. Craig vowing to save the planet (but only when his knees get better)
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:03 am
by Ted Hughes
Of course Taggart would buy Bellamy if he could you stupid brainwashed fucking knobheads. Whatsmore, if Bellamy can still run by the time his City contract runs out, he WILL sign him then. Fucking morons.
Re: Bellamy

Posted:
Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:41 am
by The Man In Blue
i'm still fucking gutted he left.