The mancityfans.net football forum

Don't know how our MI6 Man JC manages to get all those holographic wills, but hat off to him.

amazingly entertaining!

freshie wrote:

Watch on youtube.com

I hr 0.52" in "Forgive me...." says City hating Ashton.."but
'Who does the public love more Poch or Pep?'

Answer - the footballing masses love Poch from London to Dipperdom
All fair minded neutrals want Spurs honest but cheeky chappie to win the league - not the odious manager of moneybags City who despises the British 'aerial passing game' and that goes for their clubs too

Martin Samuel on this morning - a good sign

I'm gobsmacked Neil Wankton hasn't scrawled down 'Kompany yellow card - gifts City the win'

Chinners wrote:I'm gobsmacked Neil Wankton hasn't scrawled down 'Kompany yellow card - gifts City the win'

Up next 'Man City - the Silent Champions' we will be if that malignant scrote has anything to do with it - airbrushed out before we've even won it

What did they say then?

AG7 wrote:What did they say then?

zilch, Samuels mumbling that the anti-City narrative in the press and on TV was driven buy the vast number of rag readers or some such wild theory.....
we've also got no respectable ex-City pundits because of the unexcelled competence of the supremely talented ex PL players like the Ratboys, Redknapps and Carraghers.

johnny crossan wrote:

AG7 wrote:What did they say then?

zilch, Samuels mumbling that the anti-City narrative in the press and on TV was driven buy the vast number of rag readers or some such wild theory.....
we've also got no respectable ex-City pundits because of the unexcelled competence of the supremely talented ex PL players like the Ratboys, Redknapps and Carraghers.

So, basically confirming that they have an agenda to write pro-Rag/Dipper stories and anti-everybody else.

Nothing new but good to see clarification that those tin-foil hats weren't so far fetched.

johnny crossan wrote:

AG7 wrote:What did they say then?

zilch, Samuels mumbling that the anti-City narrative in the press and on TV was driven buy the vast number of rag readers or some such wild theory.....
we've also got no respectable ex-City pundits because of the unexcelled competence of the supremely talented ex PL players like the Ratboys, Redknapps and Carraghers.

Note the use of past tense.
Are you telling us that, yes it happened, but it's all in the past now JC.

Glad that's all over.

23' 34 then briefly 35' 37 and again at the 1 hour mark.

johnny crossan wrote:23' 34 then briefly 35' 37 and again at the 1 hour mark.

Watch on youtube.com

Thanks, JC. Always liked Martin Samuel.

iwasthere2012 wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

AG7 wrote:What did they say then?

zilch, Samuels mumbling that the anti-City narrative in the press and on TV was driven buy the vast number of rag readers or some such wild theory.....
we've also got no respectable ex-City pundits because of the unexcelled competence of the supremely talented ex PL players like the Ratboys, Redknapps and Carraghers.

Note the use of past tense.
Are you telling us that, yes it happened, but it's all in the past now JC.

Glad that's all over.

I see the grammatical intricacies of using the correct tense in reported speech - i.e. one tense back in time from the tense in direct speech - troubles you little across the water

johnny crossan wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

AG7 wrote:What did they say then?

zilch, Samuels mumbling that the anti-City narrative in the press and on TV was driven buy the vast number of rag readers or some such wild theory.....
we've also got no respectable ex-City pundits because of the unexcelled competence of the supremely talented ex PL players like the Ratboys, Redknapps and Carraghers.

Note the use of past tense.
Are you telling us that, yes it happened, but it's all in the past now JC.

Glad that's all over.

I see the grammatical intricacies of using the correct tense in reported speech - i.e. one tense back in time from the tense in direct speech - troubles you little across the water

I’m asking is the agenda a thing of the past then or is it still driven by the dark forces mentioned.
And it’s ‘by’ not ‘buy’ smart arse.

iwasthere2012 wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

AG7 wrote:What did they say then?

zilch, Samuels mumbling that the anti-City narrative in the press and on TV was driven by the vast number of rag readers or some such wild theory.....
we've also got no respectable ex-City pundits because of the unexcelled competence of the supremely talented ex PL players like the Ratboys, Redknapps and Carraghers.

Note the use of past tense.
Are you telling us that, yes it happened, but it's all in the past now JC.
Glad that's all over.

I see the grammatical intricacies of using the correct tense in reported speech - i.e. one tense back in time from the tense in direct speech - troubles you little across the water

I’m asking is the agenda a thing of the past then or is it still driven by the dark forces mentioned.
And it’s ‘by’ not ‘buy’ smart arse.

It's not all over - bye

^^^^^^^^^^ Some bilateral posting going on there between you two guys

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:^^^^^^^^^^ Some bilateral posting going on there between you two guys

I always make a point of correcting foreigners, MC, otherwise they never learn

johnny crossan wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:^^^^^^^^^^ Some bilateral posting going on there between you two guys

I always make a point of correcting foreigners, MC, otherwise they never learn

Try writing it in Caps lock. It might get through to us.

iwasthere2012 wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:^^^^^^^^^^ Some bilateral posting going on there between you two guys

I always make a point of correcting foreigners, MC, otherwise they never learn

Try writing it in Caps lock. It might get through to us.

Are you a bit deaf as well then?

johnny crossan wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:^^^^^^^^^^ Some bilateral posting going on there between you two guys

I always make a point of correcting foreigners, MC, otherwise they never learn

Try writing it in Caps lock. It might get through to us.

Are you a bit deaf as well then?

Pardon!