The mancityfans.net football forum

Your views please

Cos he's a devilworshipping, rag bastard mate.

cut him open and you'll find a rag :(

patrickblue wrote:Your views please

hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.

They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.

He referred to us as fucking Manchester United.
However he was one of the few voices to defend Nige over the past few weeks so I can put up with some twatishness this week for that.

Because he loves cock.

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

patrickblue wrote:Your views please

hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.

They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.

Did you not think Campbell was interfering with play Doug? Thought if we had a goal disallowed like that I would have been annoyed but understood why it wasn't given.

Burt wrote:Cos he's a devilworshipping, rag bastard mate.

THIS

mcfctm wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

patrickblue wrote:Your views please

hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.

They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.

Did you not think Campbell was interfering with play Doug? Thought if we had a goal disallowed like that I would have been annoyed but understood why it wasn't given.

He stretched out a leg, so yeah, he was involved with the play and his stretching will have caused interest amongst our defence, thus he was totally involved. Absolutely not a goal.

mcfctm wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

patrickblue wrote:Your views please

hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.

They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.

Did you not think Campbell was interfering with play Doug? Thought if we had a goal disallowed like that I would have been annoyed but understood why it wasn't given.

Your quite right mate...it was not a goal.

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

patrickblue wrote:Your views please

hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.

They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.

Their disallowed goal was a correct decision. The guy came within a cunt hair of touching the ball and lescott went over to him after the ball had passed. If dragging a player out of position is not considered interfering with play then I don't know what is.

For tevez's first goal, silva played the ball square, possibly even backward, it was only a deflection which took it into tevez's path. Correct decision again.

The linesmans flag goes up as soon as Campbell puts his foot up for the ball. Correct decision. Carlos was a half yard offside from when Silva got the ball. Different linesman different decision.

mcfctm wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

patrickblue wrote:Your views please

hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.

They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.

Did you not think Campbell was interfering with play Doug? Thought if we had a goal disallowed like that I would have been annoyed but understood why it wasn't given.

If I put on my blue tinted specs and go back to the days when off side meant offside yhen yes it was off side. But no way at all nowadays should that have been given offside.
Had it been against us death letters would already be on the way to the linesman.

Buffalo Soldier wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

patrickblue wrote:Your views please

hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.

They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.

Their disallowed goal was a correct decision. The guy came within a cunt hair of touching the ball and lescott went over to him after the ball had passed. If dragging a player out of position is not considered interfering with play then I don't know what is.

For tevez's first goal, silva played the ball square, possibly even backward, it was only a deflection which took it into tevez's path. Correct decision again.

LOL
Those specs must have the bluest tint ever.

Selling them by any chance?

s1ty m wrote:

mcfctm wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

patrickblue wrote:Your views please

hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.

They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.

Did you not think Campbell was interfering with play Doug? Thought if we had a goal disallowed like that I would have been annoyed but understood why it wasn't given.

He stretched out a leg, so yeah, he was involved with the play and his stretching will have caused interest amongst our defence, thus he was totally involved. Absolutely not a goal.

Plus on the replay Tevez didn't look offside, the defender had his leading foot at least level.
But what really pissed me off was AG going on about Blackpool dominating when they hadn't had a shot on target, plus of course calling us manure.

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

mcfctm wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

patrickblue wrote:Your views please

hahaha it's funny that when he was saying certain things about City's good fortune I said I bet somebody on the forum will have a real go at him for that. Thanks for delivering. I thought what he said was spot on actually.

They scored a fair goal disallowed we got a goal that was offside and then got a deflected 2nd.It's great to be lucky sometimes.

Did you not think Campbell was interfering with play Doug? Thought if we had a goal disallowed like that I would have been annoyed but understood why it wasn't given.

If I put on my blue tinted specs and go back to the days when off side meant offside yhen yes it was off side. But no way at all nowadays should that have been given offside.
Had it been against us death letters would already be on the way to the linesman.

As soon as he attempte to bring the ball down, he's interfering with play...sorry...offside for me.

I thought Tevez was level with the ball myself which, if true, is of course onside.

I would not have been that disappointed with the decision had Blackpool's disallowed goal been given. But it wasn't so you get on with it. Blackpool certainly didn't let it get to them and fair play to them for that.

Andy Gray? He is of no importance to me. I turn the sound off.

[quote="french_tony"]He referred to us as fucking Manchester United. /quote]

That really pissed me off the stupid jock twat.

Give it a year or two and he'll be calling the rags Man City. People like him always touch their forelock to the rich and successful. And that'll be us soon.

Lev Bronstein wrote:Give it a year or two and he'll be calling the rags Man City. People like him always touch their forelock to the rich and successful. And that'll be us soon.

I fucking hope so, because over the years, Mancheshyanited has to be the most annoying thing ever to come out of a scottish persons mouth, the fucking lazy cunts