The mancityfans.net football forum

With the amount of money they have spent they should be beating teams like Sunderland. They didn't even score a goal! He's obviously lost the dressing room. Why did he let Wilkins go? His tactics were pathetic. Blah blah blah...

King Kev wrote:With the amount of money they have spent they should be beating teams like Sunderland. They didn't even score a goal! He's obviously lost the dressing room. [highlight]Why did he let Wilkins go?[/highlight] His tactics were pathetic. Blah blah blah...

Making room for Davey Platt I heard.

brought on a midfielder when losing 2-0 he must go

Still can't get my head around the Wilkins thing. I wonder if it has upset some of the team who've been there for years.

She we have a poll on who will replace him?

King Kev wrote:With the amount of money they have spent they should be beating teams like Sunderland. They didn't even score a goal! He's obviously lost the dressing room. Why did he let Wilkins go? His tactics were pathetic. Blah blah blah...

In Chelsea's first two league games this season, they scored nearly half the amount of golas we've scored all season.

King Kev wrote:With the amount of money they have spent they should be beating teams like Sunderland. They didn't even score a goal! He's obviously lost the dressing room. Why did he let Wilkins go? His tactics were pathetic. Blah blah blah...

Daft comparison.
Chelsea are how many points ahead at the TOP OF THE PREM ?...and do Chelsea play shit football like we do?
An off day for them whereas we have an off day when we actually please the crowd.

But carry on KK...ENJOY.

Honestly, most of the time, you are too stupid for words.

But to address the "point" I think you are making in such a satirical manner

Yesterday lots of people expressed displeasure at how our manager had/has us performing. A tiny minority of these ppl said they wanted him sacked.

The rest expressed the reasons why they were pissed off and EXPLICITLY stated that, irrespective of this, Mancini should (painful as things are) be given more time.

Now why do you find this concept so difficult to grasp....aside from the obvious?

ant london wrote:Honestly, most of the time, you are too stupid for words.

But to address the "point" I think you are making in such a satirical manner

Yesterday lots of people expressed displeasure at how our manager had/has us performing. A tiny minority of these ppl said they wanted him sacked.

The rest expressed the reasons why they were pissed off and EXPLICITLY stated that, irrespective of this, Mancini should (painful as things are) be given more time.

Now why do you find this concept so difficult to grasp....aside from the obvious?

Only most of the time?? I must try harder!

I was just having a bit of a laugh mate, don't let it upset you.

LOL, looks like you are getting a couple bites KK.

King Kev wrote:With the amount of money they have spent they should be beating teams like Sunderland. They didn't even score a goal! He's obviously lost the dressing room. Why did he let Wilkins go? His tactics were pathetic. Blah blah blah...

Haha

Seems reasonable.

I agree. Gives us a better chance of winning the league.

Curses!!!!

Fuck off Lee! Haha

This loss isn't Ancelotti's fault.

He based his entire playing policy around one his injured players and another player who he tried to sign in the summer but failed to get. There are no other players within the club who could possibly fill in for either of them and he is therefore above any kind of criticism whatsoever.

Sunderland are only three points behind us now. Im more concerned about them than Chelsea.

svengali wrote:Sunderland are only three points behind us now. Im more concerned about them than Chelsea.

From what I saw today I would have to agree, if Sunderland could play like that in every game they would be playing in the Champions League next season.

King Kev wrote:

svengali wrote:Sunderland are only three points behind us now. Im more concerned about them than Chelsea.

From what I saw today I would have to agree, if Sunderland could play like that in every game they would be playing in the Champions League next season.

If they play only at a third of what they did today they will be above us by next week. We are sliding and fading fast. At this moment in time im more concerned about the teams gathering behind us that those above us. We are being dragged back into the chasing pack.

svengali wrote:Sunderland are only three points behind us now. Im more concerned about them than Chelsea.

Add Spurs and Bolton to that equation plus an unlucky loss at weekend and we'll really see things heating up. I am confident we will win though, so no real concerns.

We are just about to change gear and surge away from the challenging pack so no worries there. But weren't Sunderland good and Ned was superb.