The mancityfans.net football forum

The sort of person the great Merv Hughes would've called an 'Arsewipe'.


OH:Doctor doctor I'm feeling depressed.

Dr:Are you having family problems?

OH:It was OK until Manchester City sacked Mark Hughes

Dr:Does your wife understand you?

OH:I think so, but she just can't understand why City sacked Mark Hughes

Dr:Maybe your problem is work-related, do you get paid well?

OH:Not as well as Mark Hughes did before he was sacked by the "new owners" at Manchester City

Dr:What do you think of Carlos Tevez (actual Woolnough question)?

OH:How can City's owners expect to be treated with respect if they dont treat their employees with respect. When they sacked Mark Hughes................. (actual Holt answer)

Dr:Who do you think will win the league?

OH:Well, City are disgraceful, the way they sacked Mark Hughes. United obviously, whatever happens

Dr:Have you done your Xmas family shopping yet?

OH:I just cant bring myself to. The way Man City sacked Mark Hughes was disgraceful.

Dr:What are you getting for Xmas?

OH:A recording machine, so I can listen to myself talking about Mark Hughes' sacking all day.

Dr:Will you be going on Sunday Suppository next week to talk about the top of the league?

OH:Of course - if they pay me - I'll be able to get in about Manchester City sacking Mark Hughes - disgraceful!

Dr:Fulham seem to be about to sack Mark Hughes after only 4 months, maybe that's depressing you?

OH:No, that doesn't matter, but the way City sacked him after 18 months was outrageous, ruining football, they'll never be top etc etc

Dr:Just stay there Ollie. These two nice gentlemen in white coats are going to take you to a very nice place.

Holt is and always was a rag twat. Some people mistook his love for Hughes as some sort of pro-City stand. Hughes just happened to be target of his sexual fantasies. That's all. Nothing to do with City.

Nice one John. What a wierd fuck he is, spouting on and on about something that happened over 12 months ago, then trying to get us on-side with the 'sorry for the fan's' shit, not realising that by jumping on the Carlos bandwagon he is actually going against us and the club.

Very good John. Put a smile on my face this morning.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/columnists/holt/

bottom of the page....by all means pass comment ;)

Considering this tosser was actually a City fan who became a rag lover & last season was trying to become a City fan again until Hughes was sacked & he turned back, it shows how fickle people can be.

City are the only club to ever have sacked their manager so I suppose we were always going to get some stick for it.

I was hoping someone would point out the obvious................

".. but surely you regognise that when a club get rid of a player or a manager they have to compensate by paying off the remainder of the contract - so surely your comments are only relevant if the player(s) agitatating to leave confirm that they will pay the club the remainder of their contract - in terms of Tevez this would be 3 and a half years - and this is what the club would be looking mfor in regard to any suing - without this isn't your comparison totally irrelevant?"

"In terms of CITY and Mark Hughes - CITY have now had to deal with the 'legacy' of some of Hughes's investments with their money - either selling at a big loss - paying part wages - just letting players sit on their arses and get paid etc.... - do you not think that Hughes should carry some responsibilty for that?...."

You see I was never a 'Hughes licker - just a CITY licker!'

That's good, that is, John. Nice one.