Page 1 of 2
Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:11 pm
by svengali
This man must never be allowed to referee another of our games.
He has amassed quite a catalogue of awful decisions against us since the takeover. It's so blatant it's almost funny. How many studs up tackles, players having to have stitches and handballs does it take for someone to end the cunt.
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:13 pm
by Mike J
he was a disgrace. still doesnt take away the fact that city were dreadful and were not up for it
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:14 pm
by Sheikhermaker
Really shocking stuff. How he is allowed to referee top level matches beats me.
Pretty seething about his performance, not City's though.
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:14 pm
by Bluez
Mike J wrote:he was a disgrace. still doesnt take away the fact that city were dreadful and were not up for it
I muist have watched a different game. The one I saw had Everton spending most of the time in their own box defending with their hands. Not sure what more we could have done
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:17 pm
by guv111
He's fifty-one and looks more like sixty-one. A useless, blind sixty-one.
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:17 pm
by Mike J
Bluez wrote:Mike J wrote:he was a disgrace. still doesnt take away the fact that city were dreadful and were not up for it
I muist have watched a different game. The one I saw had Everton spending most of the time in their own box defending with their hands. Not sure what more we could have done
fair do's. 2nd half we were ok. 1st half was truly appaling though.
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:17 pm
by david yearsley
Why do we allow it ? Ferguscum wouldn´t - he might be from Northants but he´s got fuclin scouse blood in his veins for sure!
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:20 pm
by Bluez
In all the excitement of Balotelli hitting the post,it seems to have been missed that it probably should have been a penalty. Howard came out, complete missed the ball and flattened Mario
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:24 pm
by svengali
Bluez wrote:In all the excitement of Balotelli hitting the post,it seems to have been missed that it probably should have been a penalty. Howard came out, complete missed the ball and flattened Mario
Completely agree. Also watch the follow up as Mario gets up to chase it. He flattens him with a shoulder barge.
Also how did Timmy Tourettes get away with wasting around 8 minutes at every set piece?
It really was a disgraceful performance.
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:25 pm
by KinkyKinkladze
Bluez wrote:In all the excitement of Balotelli hitting the post,it seems to have been missed that it probably should have been a penalty. Howard came out, complete missed the ball and flattened Mario
Nah. Good goalkeeping.
However, don't let me detract attention away from Walton being a cunt.
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:33 pm
by xavi6
Walton wasn't at fault for either of the goals, sent off one of their players and was blindsided when Hibbert handled the ball.
If anything, the linesmen were the jokers for missing the penos from their position and for their baffling calls on throw ins.
The finger of blame needs to go directly to the players for the first 20 minutes. They cost us the game, not Walton.
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:33 pm
by Pretty Boy Lee
He could have at least had the decency to make the other 4 goalies wear the kit and gloves so we knew he was letting them take turns.
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:42 pm
by Andy, lincs
xavi6 wrote:Walton wasn't at fault for either of the goals, sent off one of their players and was blindsided when Hibbert handled the ball.
If anything, the linesmen were the jokers for missing the penos from their position and for their baffling calls on throw ins.
The finger of blame needs to go directly to the players for the first 20 minutes. They cost us the game, not Walton.
I know its nice and also somewhat vogue to say we didn't deserve anything but Walton couldn't have had better positions for the 2 Neville handballs. He just called them badly wrong. The linesman couldn't possibly have seen any more than Walton.
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:43 pm
by Bluez
Andy, lincs wrote:xavi6 wrote:Walton wasn't at fault for either of the goals, sent off one of their players and was blindsided when Hibbert handled the ball.
If anything, the linesmen were the jokers for missing the penos from their position and for their baffling calls on throw ins.
The finger of blame needs to go directly to the players for the first 20 minutes. They cost us the game, not Walton.
I know its nice and also somewhat vogue to say we didn't deserve anything but Walton couldn't have had better positions for the 2 Neville handballs. He just called them badly wrong. The linesman couldn't possibly have seen any more than Walton.
One of teh Neville handballs he was perfectly psoitioned and just didn't give it, he bottled it
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Tue Dec 21, 2010 12:41 am
by Beefymcfc
Bluez wrote:In all the excitement of Balotelli hitting the post,it seems to have been missed that it probably should have been a penalty. Howard came out, complete missed the ball and flattened Mario
That was my point at the time mate, but because it went on the ref dismissed it. Although, apart from the couple of hand-ball decision's (massive decision's) he wasn't too bad tonight.
We fucked it up for ourselves tonight and Walton had nothing to do with the first 2 goal's.
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Tue Dec 21, 2010 12:52 am
by PeterParker
Walton, Clattenburg and my favorite "7 minutes will do, Sir Feguson" Atkinson are idiots. For us will be great if we had fat Phil for every game.
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:31 am
by svengali
Beefymcfc wrote:Bluez wrote:In all the excitement of Balotelli hitting the post,it seems to have been missed that it probably should have been a penalty. Howard came out, complete missed the ball and flattened Mario
That was my point at the time mate, but because it went on the ref dismissed it. Although, apart from the couple of hand-ball decision's (massive decision's) he wasn't too bad tonight.
We fucked it up for ourselves tonight and Walton had nothing to do with the first 2 goal's.
Apart from missing the fact that Cahill had elbowed and headbutted Zaba in the space of about 2 seconds resulting in him needing four stitches, putting us down to ten men and them capitalising down our right side. It was an awful refereeing display. I wonder how many years it's been since we won with this cunt in charge? It has to be pre takeover.
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:47 am
by PeterParker
I heard the commentator saying that our balance with Walton is : 3 wins, 3 d, 4 L (with last night's game)
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:51 am
by Spiderman
Mike J wrote:he was a disgrace. still doesnt take away the fact that city were dreadful and were not up for it
Tge players looked more than up for it and went into every challenge like they were up for it we got caught cold for the first the second was due to trying to contain waiting for zaba if we had knew he was gonna be nearly 10 min I'm sure we wouldnt of conceded the second and would of gone on to win as they wouldn't of sat back like that with a one goal lead
Re: Peter Walton

Posted:
Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:55 am
by Spiderman
Bluez wrote:In all the excitement of Balotelli hitting the post,it seems to have been missed that it probably should have been a penalty. Howard came out, complete missed the ball and flattened Mario
Howard got chipped he took the man out after the ball went over him and the ball hit the post if mario was still on his feet he would of chased the ball and tapped it in should of been a pen but u very rarely get those