GingeryBlue wrote:Personally I would start him there every game instead of Toure. He looked assured on Sunday, prefers playing there, is a big strong boy, good positional sense, good passer and alongside Kompany could form the pairing at the back for the next ten years.
Thoughts?
Slim wrote:GingeryBlue wrote:Personally I would start him there every game instead of Toure. He looked assured on Sunday, prefers playing there, is a big strong boy, good positional sense, good passer and alongside Kompany could form the pairing at the back for the next ten years.
Thoughts?
We played Notts County, not Arsenal.
End of discussion.
Slim wrote:GingeryBlue wrote:Personally I would start him there every game instead of Toure. He looked assured on Sunday, prefers playing there, is a big strong boy, good positional sense, good passer and alongside Kompany could form the pairing at the back for the next ten years.
Thoughts?
We played Notts County, not Arsenal.
End of discussion.
GingeryBlue wrote:Slim wrote:GingeryBlue wrote:Personally I would start him there every game instead of Toure. He looked assured on Sunday, prefers playing there, is a big strong boy, good positional sense, good passer and alongside Kompany could form the pairing at the back for the next ten years.
Thoughts?
We played Notts County, not Arsenal.
End of discussion.
I'm not basing it purely on the Notts County game. Are you saying you believe Toure to be a better option? Talk about losing headers/generally being a liability.
Slim wrote:GingeryBlue wrote:Slim wrote:GingeryBlue wrote:Personally I would start him there every game instead of Toure. He looked assured on Sunday, prefers playing there, is a big strong boy, good positional sense, good passer and alongside Kompany could form the pairing at the back for the next ten years.
Thoughts?
We played Notts County, not Arsenal.
End of discussion.
I'm not basing it purely on the Notts County game. Are you saying you believe Toure to be a better option? Talk about losing headers/generally being a liability.
Having seen Boateng play for Hamburg quite a bit last season I can tell you I have never had faith in him in any position, when we were signing him I thought it was a joke or they had the wrong Boateng. I haven't seen anything yet to change my mind, but as you said you aren't basing it purely on the County game, what else exactly are you basing it on?
GingeryBlue wrote:Slim wrote:GingeryBlue wrote:Slim wrote:GingeryBlue wrote:Personally I would start him there every game instead of Toure. He looked assured on Sunday, prefers playing there, is a big strong boy, good positional sense, good passer and alongside Kompany could form the pairing at the back for the next ten years.
Thoughts?
We played Notts County, not Arsenal.
End of discussion.
I'm not basing it purely on the Notts County game. Are you saying you believe Toure to be a better option? Talk about losing headers/generally being a liability.
Having seen Boateng play for Hamburg quite a bit last season I can tell you I have never had faith in him in any position, when we were signing him I thought it was a joke or they had the wrong Boateng. I haven't seen anything yet to change my mind, but as you said you aren't basing it purely on the County game, what else exactly are you basing it on?
Games for Germany, games for Hamburg (must have done something ok for them as Bobby had no hesitation forking out £££'s for him) and his general attributes - athleticism, position play, distribution. Game of opinions and mine based on the aforementioned leads me to believe he is and will be a better option than Toure.
GingeryBlue wrote:Games for Germany, games for Hamburg (must have done something ok for them as Bobby had no hesitation forking out £££'s for him) and his general attributes - athleticism, position play, distribution. Game of opinions and mine based on the aforementioned leads me to believe he is and will be a better option than Toure.
blues2win wrote:I thought Lescott and Boateng looked pretty comfortable in open play on Sunday ( although of course it was Notts County). Boateng also delivered an excellent pass to Micah for the goal ( it wasn't Silva as some suggested). I saw Boateng misjudge a couple of balls in the air. On one occasion he got himself out of trouble in a classy way and made a good pass out of defence. On the other he was helped out by Lescott. Lescott, on the other hand, made two bad mistakes. First he missed a ball in the air which, but for a desperate intervention by Micah almost on the goal line, would have produced a goal. Second he inexcusably allowed a Notts County player to run across him and get in a dangerous position at the near post near the end of the match. Luckily the chance was lost. If Boateng had made those mistakes we'd never hear the end of it.
Why should Boateng get more time before we make a judgement? Quite simply because he's a young foreign player getting used to a new country and new team mates. I don't know whether he'll evolve to become Kolo's successor as I suspect the club have in mind. If he's not up to it ultimately he should and I'm sure will be discarded. As for Lescott I am not prepared to overlook his far from classy play just because he's english. After all the fuss Hughes made to get him I expected a great deal more than we've got for the money.
blues2win wrote:We obviously were watching a different match because I didn't see Boateng being turned 'inside out' by Harley once. How many chances did County create in open play? Hardly any. Read the comments on the match thread by Doug who's no fan of Boateng and thought he had a pretty good match. It was Notts County, however, and I quite agree that it would be ridiculous to read too much into it.
blues2win wrote:Beeks mate I'm not calling for Kolo to be shown the door if you were aiming your remark at me. He is however 29 and at some stage will move on. I suspect that the Club are looking at Boateng to be his successor. He's 7 years younger!
From what I can see of Boateng the jury is very much out. When I saw him at the Third Place match in the World Cup he had an excellent game at Right Back putting in a series of cracking crosses one of which led to a goal. I haven't seen that form at City in that position. We've hardly seen him at Centre Back so it's far too soon to say. Personally I would far rather have had David Luiz but that's water under the bridge.
As for Lescott I said that I thought he had a pretty comfortable match and mentioned his good covering for Boateng on one occasion. I think I was balanced. However, I'm sorry Ted it is not unfair to blame Lescott for those two mistakes or for the ridiculous penalty he gave away recently. Of course he should have covered that run; it nearly cost a goal. In practice he was left for dead blowing bubbles by a Notts County striker . It could have cost us the match. If Vinnie had made that mistake I'd be perfectly happy to criticise him believe me.
Ted Hughes wrote:I don't give a fuck whether Lescott stays or goes but I know for sure people are singling out his mistakes & ignoring others & it's not fair.
Beeks wrote:Fans are so fickle...it was only a few weeks ago that Kolo was getting his praises sung...personally I think Kolo is excellent...woe betide anyone who has a slight dip in form at the new City...'Out Of The Door You Go!' cry the new breed of city fan
Grow up FFS
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: CTID Hants, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 149 guests