by john68 » Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:54 pm
I reiterate the same view that I posted in another thread. Understand it and...it's easy...if extremely unpalatable.
Anyone who remotely thinks that FIFA, UeFA, the FA or the Premier league Plc make their decisions for the benefit of football as a sport are either extremely naive or plain stooooopid.
All of those ruling bodies see it as their responsibility to maximise the profile of the game Worldwide in order to maximise global profits. Time and time again, those bodies have made decisions that are to the dtriment of the game in pursuit of money and power.
FIFA...
The seeding of the World Cup qualifying games to ensure that the non qualified bigger countries (eg France had an easier job).
The blatant moral disreguard of the game when Henry blatantly handled the ball (France V Ireland).
The decision to play the future World Cup comps in Qatar and Russia.
UeFA...
The changes to the structure and finances of the (old) European Cup to create a biased Champions league that favoured the elite "G" group of clubs. (probably worth £400M to the rags alone), at the expense of just about every other club outside England, Germany, Spain and Italy, as well as diverting money from grass roots football development programmes to those rich clubs.
The proposed Fair Play rules, designed to safeguard the financial interests of that old "G" group of clubs by stopping new investment in clubs attempting to challenge the old order.
The FA and Prem Plc...
You really only have to look yourselves at some of the decisions taken over the last few years by refs, officials and administrators of our game to see how our home governing bodies have sought to bend the rules in favour of certain bigger clubs at the expense of other smaller ones, to see how our game has been warped by corruption.
Is anyone really suprised by this Shrek decision?
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT