Page 1 of 1

Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:58 am
by simon12
Didn`t see this anywhere and I know it`s custis and i know it`s about them BUT..

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... nited.html


Greedy Devils

GOLD TRAFFORD ... Glazers are taking funds out of Utd

By NEIL CUSTIS

Published: 23 Mar 2011
Add a comment (180)
IN the last five years, Manchester United have won a hat-trick of Premier League titles and reached two Champions League finals.
They remain on course for a Treble this season.

The club have an estimated 50 million fans worldwide and are arguably the biggest on the planet.

Should be rolling in cash then.

Should be spending millions on the world's greatest players to entertain the bumper 76,000 crowds that carry on packing into Old Trafford.


EnlargeTALENT ... £400m of stars Crowds that have seen the cost of their tickets soar by 42 per cent in the nearly six years the club have been in the charge of their American owners - the Glazer family.

Incredibly, the prospect of United spending big on players has increasingly become a fantasy in the Theatre of Dreams.

Depressing (to whom?) figures released yesterday show United LOST £108.9m over the last financial year to June 2010.
Which means instead of new stars, the monies United fans help generate are now financing the huge debts from the Glazer takeover.

United have been milked of around £400m in interest payments and charges since the Americans took control in 2005.

A figure that went up by nearly £100m in the course of the last financial year.

In that same time, only a net £56m has been reinvested in the team.

A net spend less than that of Manchester City, Chelsea, Tottenham, Aston Villa and Sunderland.

Under the Glazers, the average season ticket in Old Trafford's South Stand has gone up from around £500 to £930. Clear proof that the fans have been hit hardest under the Americans' ownership.

Duncan Drasdo is (a dick head) chief executive of the Manchester United Supporters Trust, which helped organise the anti-Glazer Green and Gold movement.

He has been voicing his anger for many years over how supporters have been hit in the pocket to finance the Glazer regime.

Drasdo said: "It sickens (dick heads) people that they are paying increased ticket prices every season under the Glazers but the money is just being wasted and not invested in the playing squad."

United will tell you there is £120m in the bank waiting to be invested in players.

Fans are certainly not holding their breath. (Shame)

How much better off would United have been had they not been bought by the Glazers and had they not seen £400m go out of the window?

United had no debt and no interest payments before the Glazers' stunning £790m takeover, which sparked a fans' revolt.

Last October, the club's star player Wayne Rooney voiced his own concerns about the future of the club and a lack of investment.

That mirrored the fans' feelings, though Rooney felt that his worries had been addressed before he signed his megabucks new contract. (No shit!!)

Chief executive David Gill insists there is certainly no pressure on to sell players and they are in the market to buy.

He declared: "We have money in the bank so there is zero pressure on that, no pressure at all to sell any star player whether it is Wayne Rooney or X, Y or Z. I can categorically say that."

United have invested in the likes of Chris Smalling from Fulham at £12m and Javier Hernandez from Mexican club Chivas Guadalajara at £7m for this season.

But the marquee signings United fans had come to expect, and believe the club need to maintain their constant push for all the major trophies, have been nowhere to be seen in recent years.

Most notably, United found themselves outbid for their main summer target of 2009, when Karim Benzema went to Real Madrid from Lyon for £30m.


Off the pitch, United became the first club to break the £100m commercial revenue barrier.

The same figure again has been made from media revenues. That, too, is positive.

They also now make around £100m from matchday revenue per year, the vast majority of which comes, of course, from ticket sales.

Despite the startling figures, which have angered United fans year on year, this is what Gill had to say about recent figures.

He stated: "We have a long-term financing structure in place, excellent revenues that are growing, we are controlling our costs - total wages are 46 per cent of turnover - and we can afford the interest on our long-term finance."

In August 2004, when he was fighting against the Glazers' takeover, which he claimed would be 'unmanageable', Gill said: "Debt is the road to ruin."

Fast forward to this year's figures and Gill revealed: "I can't speak for any other club but the United fans should not be concerned."

Presumably, he meant the fans who can still afford to go to Old Trafford.

Question: If what I have underlined continues for 2 more years are they out of the chumps league?

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:14 am
by Ted Hughes
I believe they do have a transfer 'war chest' but once it's gone it's gone. If they're to get Mourinho in as the next manager then Ferguson can't spend it imo.

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:16 am
by lets all have a disco
I wouldnt have minded us investing 7 million in Hernandez or as it's looking 12 in Smalling.

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:18 am
by Goaters 103
Agree on the financial side of things thats its good fun, but what exactly has changed? Yes, their fans are being fleeced - good - but they are still regularly winning things and parked at the top end of footballs top table.

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:21 am
by lets all have a disco
Goaters 103 wrote:Agree on the financial side of things thats its good fun, but what exactly has changed? Yes, their fans are being fleeced - good - but they are still regularly winning things and parked at the top end of footballs top table.


It wont change until Bacon retires,he is the football club.

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:22 am
by Ted Hughes
lets all have a disco wrote:I wouldnt have minded us investing 7 million in Hernandez or as it's looking 12 in Smalling.


Still not convinced by either, as top 4 starting players. Rags have an amazing capacity to get away with stuff. I could imagine both being a bit of a disaster if they played for us. If Danny Sturridge & Boateng signed for the rags tomorrow I bet they'd do just as well.

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:28 am
by lets all have a disco
Ted Hughes wrote:
lets all have a disco wrote:I wouldnt have minded us investing 7 million in Hernandez or as it's looking 12 in Smalling.


Still not convinced by either, as top 4 starting players. Rags have an amazing capacity to get away with stuff. I could imagine both being a bit of a disaster if they played for us. If Danny Sturridge & Boateng signed for the rags tomorrow I bet they'd do just as well.



Bacon again?

Hernandez has the knack of being in the right place at the right time and Smalling has looked very solid for me.

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:38 am
by Ted Hughes
lets all have a disco wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:
lets all have a disco wrote:I wouldnt have minded us investing 7 million in Hernandez or as it's looking 12 in Smalling.


Still not convinced by either, as top 4 starting players. Rags have an amazing capacity to get away with stuff. I could imagine both being a bit of a disaster if they played for us. If Danny Sturridge & Boateng signed for the rags tomorrow I bet they'd do just as well.



Bacon again?

Hernandez has the knack of being in the right place at the right time and Smalling has looked very solid for me.


Probably down to a mixture of Baconface & the fact that most teams are starstruck when playing the rags. Would we ever beat Arsenal with the side they put out?

I agree Hernandez is a natural scorer but I think Smalling has got away with a lot of mistakes so far, which would have been punished if he'd played for us. To be able to stick players in the team & no matter how much they fuck up, nobody makes them pay, must be a hell of an advantage for bringing players through.

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 11:01 am
by bluej
Ted Hughes wrote:
lets all have a disco wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:
lets all have a disco wrote:I wouldnt have minded us investing 7 million in Hernandez or as it's looking 12 in Smalling.


Still not convinced by either, as top 4 starting players. Rags have an amazing capacity to get away with stuff. I could imagine both being a bit of a disaster if they played for us. If Danny Sturridge & Boateng signed for the rags tomorrow I bet they'd do just as well.



Bacon again?

Hernandez has the knack of being in the right place at the right time and Smalling has looked very solid for me.


Probably down to a mixture of Baconface & the fact that most teams are starstruck when playing the rags. Would we ever beat Arsenal with the side they put out?

I agree Hernandez is a natural scorer but I think Smalling has got away with a lot of mistakes so far, which would have been punished if he'd played for us. To be able to stick players in the team & no matter how much they fuck up, nobody makes them pay, must be a hell of an advantage for bringing players through.


You can add that Rafael to that as well, he's just like Balotelli in that he is a sending off waiting to happen.

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 11:27 am
by The Man In Blue
They'll do what they want
They'll do what they waaaaaannnnt
They are the glazers
They'll do what they want

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:29 pm
by Nickyboy
Custis is glowing about how United have managed to increased their matchday revenue to £100m, but in the same breath criticising the Glazers for raising ticket prices

is he thick or just a cunt?

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:56 pm
by pepsi_dave
Nickyboy wrote:Custis is glowing about how United have managed to increased their matchday revenue to £100m, but in the same breath criticising the Glazers for raising ticket prices

is he thick or just a cunt?


I think you will find he is simply a thick cunt!

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:15 pm
by blues-clues
Got to hand it to the Glazer boys. Hardly put up any of their own money for the original deal. Taken out 100's of millions already and have an asset they can sell for £1.5bn. Even after they pay off the debts they will probably be able to chalk up a dirty great big £1 billion in the plus column. Such a shame they have fleeced a much loved and historically significant British Institution. I wonder if they could arrange a few more deals with other such National Treasures? Dear Mr Glazer, could you have a look at the Sun Newspaper!

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:20 pm
by Slim
I love the way £280M is considered hardly anything.

Re: Malc G

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 8:11 pm
by ashton287
They will win while taggart is there and all the problems will just be background noise.

When he goes it all ends and it doesnt matter who they get in after him.

Even jose is only half the manager taggart is and would no where near emulate his success.

I just can't wait for the day he finally fucks off, there isnt even a word for how happy i will be when i see this:

[highlight][scroll]Breaking news: Ferguson retires. Breaking news: Ferguson retires. Breaking news: Ferguson retires[/scroll][/highlight]