The mancityfans.net football forum

sorry if already covered

but, why the fcuk was phil n*****e on the panel for our game????

would sky sports put uwe rosler on the panel for a nobhead game?? don't think so

does my fcuking head in that they hardly ever put a former city player on the panel!!

rant over!!

Sky use quite a few ex city players actually ...

I hope he paid for a ticket as i hope Bacon chops did aswell.

lets all have a disco wrote:I hope he paid for a ticket as i hope Bacon chops did aswell.

Don't be daft ... they got them from the OSC

I don't know that stats but a typical Sky panel for a City game, home or away, often involves an ex player from the opposition, an ex player from one of the teams close to us in the league & a Utd player or supporter who hates us. The 3rd one used to be David Platt.

Chinners wrote:

lets all have a disco wrote:I hope he paid for a ticket as i hope Bacon chops did aswell.

Don't be daft ... they got them from the OSC

Bet they got the coach travel thrown in aswell.

lets all have a disco wrote:

Chinners wrote:

lets all have a disco wrote:I hope he paid for a ticket as i hope Bacon chops did aswell.

Don't be daft ... they got them from the OSC

Bet they got the coach travel thrown in aswell.

Only for family and friends in the ticket office mind ...

Before you lay into Phil Neal, let's not forget his role in City's mmanagerial roundabout season of 1996-97.
He stepped into the breach following Steve Coppell#s walkabout and managed us for 10 games as caretaker.
At 1st sight, his record may seem atrocious but some of that could be blamed on the disorganised chaos the club was in at the time.

The club seemed quite unmanageable at the time and nobody seemed to want the job. It was Neal who made the club sit up and take action regarding our future. With no sign of any permanent manager being employed, Neal came out publically and demanded the club did something. His statement was along the lines of..."The club is in a total mess and needs to sort out a permament manager. I don't care if it's me or if I get sacked, but for the good of Manchester City, make a decision"

john68 wrote:Before you lay into Phil Neal, let's not forget his role in City's mmanagerial roundabout season of 1996-97.
He stepped into the breach following Steve Coppell#s walkabout and managed us for 10 games as caretaker.
At 1st sight, his record may seem atrocious but some of that could be blamed on the disorganised chaos the club was in at the time.

The club seemed quite unmanageable at the time and nobody seemed to want the job. It was Neal who made the club sit up and take action regarding our future. With no sign of any permanent manager being employed, Neal came out publically and demanded the club did something. His statement was along the lines of..."The club is in a total mess and needs to sort out a permament manager. I don't care if it's me or if I get sacked, but for the good of Manchester City, make a decision"

Do you know it was Phil Neal? Cause from the OP I got the feeling that n*****e meant chuckle2.

Hahahaha...that could very well be my bad Slim. I didn't watch the game til later and neither of the chuckle bros ever enter my head.
You're probably right...Ta!

Phil n*v***e - if ever a guy was made for radio punditry, not television. There again if his presence is keeping his gobshite brother off our screens then I am totally in favour.

again no former blue on the panel!!

coleman and fredial both played for blackburn!!

am i being paranoid ere??

don't think there was a blue on the panel for the semi either????

this does my head in!!

There's only 1 city!! wrote:again no former blue on the panel!!

coleman and fredial both played for blackburn!!

am i being paranoid ere??

don't think there was a blue on the panel for the semi either????

this does my head in!!

Yeah, I was wondering about that, also!

Coleman is a youth product of ours you plebs.

They show Silva's shot that came back off the post, and their penalty shout; and thats the highlights
So somebody who hadn't seen or heard the first-half commentary would conclude its been 'even Stephen'

Biased, or wha'?

I think we're looking for things that don't exist. Tonight, anyway.

KinkyKinkladze wrote:Coleman is a youth product of ours you plebs.

He's admitted to being a good buddy of the Blackburn manager which explains his pro-Blackburn comments!

The Original Special One wrote:

KinkyKinkladze wrote:Coleman is a youth product of ours you plebs.

He's admitted to being a good buddy of the Blackburn manager which explains his pro-Blackburn comments!

Kean was his assistant at Fulham.

Nickyboy wrote:

The Original Special One wrote:

KinkyKinkladze wrote:Coleman is a youth product of ours you plebs.

He's admitted to being a good buddy of the Blackburn manager which explains his pro-Blackburn comments!

Kean was his assistant at Fulham.

That explains it
Although his post-game comments weren't too bad!

The Original Special One wrote:

Nickyboy wrote:

The Original Special One wrote:

KinkyKinkladze wrote:Coleman is a youth product of ours you plebs.

He's admitted to being a good buddy of the Blackburn manager which explains his pro-Blackburn comments!

Kean was his assistant at Fulham.

That explains it
Although his post-game comments weren't too bad!

Yeah he said that Mancini was wrong to say we could have been 2 up at half time and then said ok they hit the post and had one cleared off the line.Numb or what.