Page 1 of 5

MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:14 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
Now this was and still is my choice to take over from this fuckwit of a manager.
He is a winner and is not scared to take games by the scruff of the neck........also a top top man manager and he is far from fucking boring.....RM and Inter....cracking sides who played and in RM case still play exciting football.



I hope the hierarchy are in secret talks with him right now about taking over this cunts job in the summer.

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:16 pm
by Lee_R
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Now this was and still is my choice to take over from this fuckwit of a manager.
He is a winner and is not scared to take games by the scruff of the neck........also a top top man manager and he is far from fucking boring.....RM and Inter....cracking sides who played and in RM case still play exciting football.



I hope the hierarchy are in secret talks with him right now about taking over this cunts job in the summer.


Absolutely.

edit..

I DARE MOURINHO TO MANAGE CITY!

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:28 pm
by Mike J
Wenger would be my no 1 choice but as there is no hope of that then Jose would be my next in line. We'll probably end up with someone shite if mancini gets the bullet.

Please god not ranieri.

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:32 pm
by Kladze
Mourinho wouldn't be my number one choice but if we absolutely had to have him to replace the numbskull currently in charge, I'd take him.

And there'd certainly be entertainment value ;-)

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:41 pm
by bigblue
I know Mourinho has good results, but you know if he comes he'll only here for 3 seasons max. Then he'll want to go to the next big job to prove his worth. Basically he values his career more than any individual club. As much as I hate baconface, Wenger, or Daglish, they show complete dedication to the club that they are with.

Get Mick McCarthy to do the job, or some lower league hard man who knows a bit about tactics. Get a manager who can scare the shit out of people (motivate) who are set financially for life. What this club needs is someone who can fire up these players from around the world to play in a Manchester City shirt. A bonus would be a local manager who actually loves Manchester City and winning games for our fans.

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:49 pm
by Lee_R
bigblue wrote:I know Mourinho has good results, but you know if he comes he'll only here for 3 seasons max. Then he'll want to go to the next big job to prove his worth. Basically he values his career more than any individual club. As much as I hate baconface, Wenger, or Daglish, they show complete dedication to the club that they are with.

Get Mick McCarthy to do the job, or some lower league hard man who knows a bit about tactics. Get a manager who can scare the shit out of people (motivate) who are set financially for life. What this club needs is someone who can fire up these players from around the world to play in a Manchester City shirt. A bonus would be a local manager who actually loves Manchester City and winning games for our fans.


FFS WHY HAS NO ONE ELSE THOUGH ABOUT THAT!!??

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:04 am
by Blue Blood
Bring back KK. At least we'll play with a bit of passion and flair.

Mourinho isn't a bad choice either though :D

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:21 am
by freshie
bigblue wrote:Get Mick McCarthy to do the job, or some lower league hard man who knows a bit about tactics.


Seriously? What the hell has Mick McCarthy done as a manager that proves he would be capable of being in charge of an ambitious club like ours?

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:44 am
by Blue Blood
freshie wrote:
bigblue wrote:Get Mick McCarthy to do the job, or some lower league hard man who knows a bit about tactics.


Seriously? What the hell has Mick McCarthy done as a manager that proves he would be capable of being in charge of an ambitious club like ours?


I could level that argument at Mancini right now...

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:45 am
by Sideshow Bob
Thanks but no thanks. He has ZERO loyalty to anyone but himself. Besides, why would he even want the job?? It's more of a no-win proposition than Real.

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:48 am
by freshie
Blue Blood wrote:
I could level that argument at Mancini right now...


And I would agree with you. But if Mick McCarthy is the answer I don't even want to know what the question is

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:15 am
by paulmclaren
The odds of us getting Mourinho are v slim imo.
Plus i know quiet a few city fans who do not want him.
What we need is a Guss Hiddink, i say it all the fucking time.

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:44 am
by bigblue
freshie wrote:
bigblue wrote:Get Mick McCarthy to do the job, or some lower league hard man who knows a bit about tactics.


Seriously? What the hell has Mick McCarthy done as a manager that proves he would be capable of being in charge of an ambitious club like ours?


I don't see why we have to pick a manager who has already made a name for himself. Choose someone who is hungry for success and wants to make City what his career will be known for. Fuck what he has achieved in the past, its about what he will achieve in the future. Doesn't have to be Mick, but make it someone who isn't just collecting a paycheck. It has to mean more than money for the coach if it ever will for the players. Just because you have the money doesn't make it right to always spend it

What did baconface, Guardiola, or Wenger achieve before their current clubs?

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:53 am
by Feed The Goat
Uwe Rosler. Young in manager terms hungry for success and loves city

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:02 am
by freshie
bigblue wrote:
freshie wrote:
bigblue wrote:Get Mick McCarthy to do the job, or some lower league hard man who knows a bit about tactics.


Seriously? What the hell has Mick McCarthy done as a manager that proves he would be capable of being in charge of an ambitious club like ours?


I don't see why we have to pick a manager who has already made a name for himself. Choose someone who is hungry for success and wants to make City what his career will be known for. Fuck what he has achieved in the past, its about what he will achieve in the future. Doesn't have to be Mick, but make it someone who isn't just collecting a paycheck. It has to mean more than money for the coach if it ever will for the players. Just because you have the money doesn't make it right to always spend it

What did baconface, Guardiola, or Wenger achieve before their current clubs?


The difference between the situation at City and the 3 managers you mention above is that they weren't managing the richest club in the world when they started their respective jobs. The pressure at City from the owners, especially the media and to some extent the fans is incredible. An inexperienced manager would have to not only be able to handle this pressure to deliver almost immediate success but also the intense media scrutiny that would follow not to mention being able to manage some of the egos in the dressing room. You put forward a romantic notion but who would you consider as realistic candidates?

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:38 am
by bigblue
freshie wrote:
bigblue wrote:I don't see why we have to pick a manager who has already made a name for himself. Choose someone who is hungry for success and wants to make City what his career will be known for. Fuck what he has achieved in the past, its about what he will achieve in the future. Doesn't have to be Mick, but make it someone who isn't just collecting a paycheck. It has to mean more than money for the coach if it ever will for the players. Just because you have the money doesn't make it right to always spend it

What did baconface, Guardiola, or Wenger achieve before their current clubs?


The difference between the situation at City and the 3 managers you mention above is that they weren't managing the richest club in the world when they started their respective jobs. The pressure at City from the owners, especially the media and to some extent the fans is incredible. An inexperienced manager would have to not only be able to handle this pressure to deliver almost immediate success but also the intense media scrutiny that would follow not to mention being able to manage some of the egos in the dressing room. You put forward a romantic notion but who would you consider as realistic candidates?


If we were to appoint a new manager, there would already be 2 failed managers on this 'project' in the past 2 years. The expectation from the media would be for this manager to fail too. But besides all that, the ability to handle pressure doesn't depend on past success, it depends on someone's character and mental strength. Sure you can improve your mental success from past experience, but it isn't a necessary precondition.

Khaldoon and his partners run a successful investment fund, so they must have he ability to identify good leadership talent. Send a few scouts to check out promising managers below the radar (like you would do for players), interview the people that the canadate has worked with (everyone from players to groundsmen), have a thorough talk with the person, and get a true understanding of who this individual is and what they are capable of.

The fact is that our roster is full of players who can out play their competition every week. We don't need fancy tactics, just have a balanced team with the best players in their favored positions. We need a coach who would have every player working harder than they ever have in their life for the entire 90 minutes. We need a leader and motivator. I can't give you any names, but Uwe doesn't sound too far off. I'd even be for Kompany to act as a player/manager, he seems smart enough.

My main argument is why would you limit your search to a small pool of potential candidates who have already possibly reached the pinnacle of their career. Sure they may be successful, but do they really have the desire of trying to prove themselves like it was their first job? Just look at Van Gaal in 95 at Ajax compared to his recent spell at Bayern.

I want a manager at City who would literally kill someone if it would help us win, but is mentally stable enough to never actually murder someone.

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:29 am
by Vantage
It was Brian Kidd who unseated Hughes the snide so and so was scuttling off to cook and marwood any chance he could get he wants the managers job himself - shudder

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:38 am
by avoidconfusion
Blue Blood wrote:Bring back KK. At least we'll play with a bit of passion and flair.

Mourinho isn't a bad choice either though :D


Honestly, Kevin Keagan might have lost to Liverpool too... but it would have been a 5:4 loss. :)

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:22 am
by Mike J
would people really take rosler now or next season for that matter!? i love the guy but i think itd be a fucking disaster!

the shortlist should be wenger, mourinho, hiddink, boas.

Re: MOURINHO IN.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:47 am
by avoidconfusion
Mike J wrote:would people really take rosler now or next season for that matter!? i love the guy but i think itd be a fucking disaster!

the shortlist should be wenger, mourinho, hiddink, boas.


Add the Tealady and Moonchester to that list.