qpr - point deduction?

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

qpr - point deduction?

Postby Nigels Tackle » Thu May 05, 2011 10:08 pm

decision conveniently delayed until after the final round of championship games this weekend....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13301409.stm

what's the betting that they have all agreed that rangers will be deducted the number of points that will means they finish just ahead of cardiff or swansea?
ARMCHAIR FAN
Nigels Tackle
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18700
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: here, there, every fucking where
Supporter of: man love
My favourite player is: riyad meh!rez

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby cdncityfan » Thu May 05, 2011 10:25 pm

Unless there was a real issue about sorting through the evidence in the case, the delay is absolutely outrageous.

Would not be surprised if the punishment was simply an exaggerated fine. Or, as you say, a token point deduction.

Better question than all the speculation is why the English FA cannot get around the fact that most other leagues not blessed with the Premiership's TV deals have long allowed third party ownership and co-ownership as means of financing the club. So long as their is no material fraud, I really do not see why it should be prohibited.
Manchester City FC: the class of the Premier League!
cdncityfan
Richard Edghill Whipping Boy
 
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 9:10 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Supporter of: Rangers / City
My favourite player is: Mario Balotelli

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby simon12 » Thu May 05, 2011 10:29 pm

Prem have stated before they are accepted a resolution/decision has to have been reached.
simon12
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1889
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 4:03 pm
Location: Timperley
Supporter of: The only team in Mcr
My favourite player is: Dirk Diggler

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby spiv » Thu May 05, 2011 10:51 pm

A slap on the wrist at most.
Image
User avatar
spiv
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1693
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:20 pm
Location: Block 217
Supporter of: .

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Thu May 05, 2011 11:21 pm

spiv wrote:A slap on the wrist at most.


They should be battered mate...at lest 15 points.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32325
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby spiv » Thu May 05, 2011 11:27 pm

No no no,,, i'm looking forward to getting down the bush next season for some pie mash and liquor and stewed eels. Love all that sort of stuff ;)
Image
User avatar
spiv
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1693
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:20 pm
Location: Block 217
Supporter of: .

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby ronk » Fri May 06, 2011 8:55 am

cdncityfan wrote:Unless there was a real issue about sorting through the evidence in the case, the delay is absolutely outrageous.

Would not be surprised if the punishment was simply an exaggerated fine. Or, as you say, a token point deduction.

Better question than all the speculation is why the English FA cannot get around the fact that most other leagues not blessed with the Premiership's TV deals have long allowed third party ownership and co-ownership as means of financing the club. So long as their is no material fraud, I really do not see why it should be prohibited.


Or they could apply a points deduction onto next season.

I've never really seen the positive benefits of 3rd party player ownership for clubs, especially in a league like the premiership. They don't really get anything out of the deal, it appears to be just a way for agents to enrich themselves further.
“Do onto others — then run!”
B. Hill
User avatar
ronk
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7501
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Dublin

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby Alioune DVToure » Fri May 06, 2011 8:58 am

Am I the only one who thinks it would be harsh were QPR denied promotion, especially if Cardiff were to take their place?

Surely Cardiff's crimes are worse. They signed a few players on decent wages last summer whilst failing to pay a few hundred grand owed to Motherwell. Surely that's a worse way of gaining an unfair advantage, being at a another club's expense and all that.
Image
Alioune DVToure
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6335
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 4:14 pm
Supporter of: City

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby Alex Sapphire » Fri May 06, 2011 9:04 am

it's simple... They hate Warnock and want to maximise his pain
In fact everyone hates Warnock
Except Jim
Never criticise a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes.
That way when you do criticise him you'll be a mile away.
And you'll have his shoes.


Ἄνδρες γάρ πόλις, καί οὐ τείχη
User avatar
Alex Sapphire
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5758
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:02 am

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby ant london » Fri May 06, 2011 9:07 am

Alioune DVToure wrote:Am I the only one who thinks it would be harsh were QPR denied promotion, especially if Cardiff were to take their place?

Surely Cardiff's crimes are worse. They signed a few players on decent wages last summer whilst failing to pay a few hundred grand owed to Motherwell. Surely that's a worse way of gaining an unfair advantage, being at a another club's expense and all that.



From the facts I have read about the case it would be a bit of a farce if QPR were denied promotion full stop

read this...

Alejandro Faurlín should have no blame attached to him in the Football Association investigation that could lead to Queens Park Rangers' missing out on promotion to the Premier League. That is the message the Argentinian midfielder at the centre of the inquiry has received from his QPR team-mate Adel Taarabt.

"The first few days he was a little bit worried because he may have thought the lads would blame him, but we told him it is not your fault," Taarabt said of Faurlín ahead of the FA disciplinary hearing beginning on Tuesday into charges arising from his 2009 transfer to west London. "He has been brilliant all season and you can't deny that. He deserves to be in the Premier League as well. We have done the job on the pitch so we deserve to be where we are. Every game we play 11 against 11 and we win games on the pitch; we don't do anything else. We didn't cheat or do anything wrong. I don't know what is happening upstairs but the FA will make the decision and we will see."

It is common practice for South American players' registrations to belong to agents or investment companies rather than their clubs; however in this country such arrangements breach FA and Premier League rules. The Guardian reported in March that in the Faurlín case Instituto de Córdoba, his former club, received nothing from the transfer. The FA refused to comment about any element of the affair on Monday. However the case has led to seven charges being levelled against QPR and their chairman, Gianni Paladini, which will be considered by a three-man disciplinary commission led by an independent QC this week.

QPR and Paladini could not be contacted on Monday but have consistently denied wrongdoing. As well as three charges relating to the third-party contracts, QPR face more of bringing the game into disrepute and of using the services of an unauthorised agent. Paladini is personally accused of concealing or misrepresenting elements of the Faurlín transfer, leading to a supplementary disrepute charge for him.

QPR have previously let it be known that they considered Faurlín, now 24, to have been out of contract with Instituto at the time of his move and that he was therefore a free transfer. The agent named in the transfer documents is believed to be Peppino Tirri, who held a Fifa licence at the time of the transfer but had not registered with the FA, meaning he did not have its authorisation to conduct transfer business in England. Tirri, who could not be contacted on Monday through the email address or telephone numbers on Fifa's website, is now registered with the FA.

QPR should learn the commission's verdict on Friday and if they are found to be in breach of FA regulations they may be deducted points. The Championship leaders were nine points clear of the playoffs before Monday's fixtures and have one match still to play.

The Football League is believed to be considering the logistical implications for those playoffs and may defer the semi-finals to accommodate the legal process, which would surely include a QPR appeal in the event of a guilty verdict.

The existence of the third-party agreements only came to light when the club asked the Football League for permission to buy out the third-party interest in Faurlín's contract. At the time there was no Football League rule against third-party ownership – it is now aligning its rules with those of the Premier League – and QPR claim they were unaware that the FA's rules did make provision against it.

In the course of its inquiries the FA has been trying to uncover what was paid to whom. Paladini was quoted on Monday as saying: "We will fight all the way. Justice will be done. We have done everything in good faith."

Charges QPR face

1) Entering contracts with third-party organisations enabling them "materially to influence" the club's policies or its team's performance

2) Entering contracts assigning rights to or making payments to a third party in connection with a player transfer

3) Providing the FA with allegedly false information in later contract extension documents

4) Bringing the game into disrepute

5) Using the services of an unauthorised agent

Charges Gianni Paladini faces

1) Bringing the game into disrepute

2) Concealing or misrepresenting the reality and/or substance of matters relating to a transaction or contract negotiation
Image
User avatar
ant london
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11505
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:01 pm
Location: Almaty
Supporter of: Cityski
My favourite player is: Mario Balotelli

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby Alioune DVToure » Fri May 06, 2011 9:15 am

ant london wrote:
Alioune DVToure wrote:Am I the only one who thinks it would be harsh were QPR denied promotion, especially if Cardiff were to take their place?

Surely Cardiff's crimes are worse. They signed a few players on decent wages last summer whilst failing to pay a few hundred grand owed to Motherwell. Surely that's a worse way of gaining an unfair advantage, being at a another club's expense and all that.



From the facts I have read about the case it would be a bit of a farce if QPR were denied promotion full stop

read this...

Alejandro Faurlín should have no blame attached to him in the Football Association investigation that could lead to Queens Park Rangers' missing out on promotion to the Premier League. That is the message the Argentinian midfielder at the centre of the inquiry has received from his QPR team-mate Adel Taarabt.

"The first few days he was a little bit worried because he may have thought the lads would blame him, but we told him it is not your fault," Taarabt said of Faurlín ahead of the FA disciplinary hearing beginning on Tuesday into charges arising from his 2009 transfer to west London. "He has been brilliant all season and you can't deny that. He deserves to be in the Premier League as well. We have done the job on the pitch so we deserve to be where we are. Every game we play 11 against 11 and we win games on the pitch; we don't do anything else. We didn't cheat or do anything wrong. I don't know what is happening upstairs but the FA will make the decision and we will see."

It is common practice for South American players' registrations to belong to agents or investment companies rather than their clubs; however in this country such arrangements breach FA and Premier League rules. The Guardian reported in March that in the Faurlín case Instituto de Córdoba, his former club, received nothing from the transfer. The FA refused to comment about any element of the affair on Monday. However the case has led to seven charges being levelled against QPR and their chairman, Gianni Paladini, which will be considered by a three-man disciplinary commission led by an independent QC this week.

QPR and Paladini could not be contacted on Monday but have consistently denied wrongdoing. As well as three charges relating to the third-party contracts, QPR face more of bringing the game into disrepute and of using the services of an unauthorised agent. Paladini is personally accused of concealing or misrepresenting elements of the Faurlín transfer, leading to a supplementary disrepute charge for him.

QPR have previously let it be known that they considered Faurlín, now 24, to have been out of contract with Instituto at the time of his move and that he was therefore a free transfer. The agent named in the transfer documents is believed to be Peppino Tirri, who held a Fifa licence at the time of the transfer but had not registered with the FA, meaning he did not have its authorisation to conduct transfer business in England. Tirri, who could not be contacted on Monday through the email address or telephone numbers on Fifa's website, is now registered with the FA.

QPR should learn the commission's verdict on Friday and if they are found to be in breach of FA regulations they may be deducted points. The Championship leaders were nine points clear of the playoffs before Monday's fixtures and have one match still to play.

The Football League is believed to be considering the logistical implications for those playoffs and may defer the semi-finals to accommodate the legal process, which would surely include a QPR appeal in the event of a guilty verdict.

The existence of the third-party agreements only came to light when the club asked the Football League for permission to buy out the third-party interest in Faurlín's contract. At the time there was no Football League rule against third-party ownership – it is now aligning its rules with those of the Premier League – and QPR claim they were unaware that the FA's rules did make provision against it.

In the course of its inquiries the FA has been trying to uncover what was paid to whom. Paladini was quoted on Monday as saying: "We will fight all the way. Justice will be done. We have done everything in good faith."

Charges QPR face

1) Entering contracts with third-party organisations enabling them "materially to influence" the club's policies or its team's performance

2) Entering contracts assigning rights to or making payments to a third party in connection with a player transfer

3) Providing the FA with allegedly false information in later contract extension documents

4) Bringing the game into disrepute

5) Using the services of an unauthorised agent

Charges Gianni Paladini faces

1) Bringing the game into disrepute

2) Concealing or misrepresenting the reality and/or substance of matters relating to a transaction or contract negotiation


Maybe the chairman naively thought he could get away with dealing with this snide agent, but they still paid full value for a player and didn't rip anyone off. Very harsh in my opinion.
Image
Alioune DVToure
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6335
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 4:14 pm
Supporter of: City

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby Arjan Van Schotte » Fri May 06, 2011 9:27 am

Having read that ant - and having no knowledge of the rules that govern this, I have no idea what to think!

All i can say is that it doesn't appear that they were necessarily gaining an advantage over other teams - just trying to be expedient whilst bending the rules. If that's anywhere near correct, then IMHO a financial penalty is far more appropriate than a points deduction.

Either way, delaying the decision yet again is outrageous! I can only imagine that the disciplinary "panel" is having major disagreements as to the outcome...
"Whatever it is that we "bought" - we didn't put it up for sale..."

Image
User avatar
Arjan Van Schotte
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Tueart's Overhead
 
Posts: 8692
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: Elland Back
Supporter of: Манчестер Сити

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby Dameerto » Fri May 06, 2011 10:28 am

Alioune DVToure wrote:Maybe the chairman naively thought he could get away with dealing with this snide agent, but they still paid full value for a player and didn't rip anyone off. Very harsh in my opinion.


Naive and chairman just don't go together in a footballing sense. He knew exactly what he was doing in my opinion.
VIVA EL CITIES

"The adjudicatory chamber of the Ethics Committee ... has banned Mr Joseph S. Blatter ... for eight years and Mr Michel Platini ... for eight years from all football-related activities (administrative, sports or any other) on a national and international level. The bans come into force immediately." - 21/12/2015
User avatar
Dameerto
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18703
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:08 pm
Supporter of: El City
My favourite player is: Sergio Forwardo

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby lets all have a disco » Fri May 06, 2011 10:31 am

Big fine and a telling off maybe a couple of points off but nothing to stop promotion.
He was never me,me,me but always you,you,you
User avatar
lets all have a disco
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22479
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:20 pm
Location: Blue Army
Supporter of: Manchester City FC
My favourite player is: STILL MICAH RICHARDS

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby feedthegreek » Fri May 06, 2011 2:54 pm

apparantly like when we went up as champs under keegan they should pick up the trophy
tomorrow and all the medals after the match. theres no way they are gonna take it off them after that.
User avatar
feedthegreek
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2405
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:33 pm

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby bluej » Sat May 07, 2011 11:02 am

It's been confirmed that they won't face a points deduction-

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/13318784.stm
bluej
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2654
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:11 am
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby Ted Hughes » Sat May 07, 2011 11:08 am

Neil Warnock gets the job done yet again. Wonder if they'll allow him to spend money? Be interesting to see what kind of team he'd come up with if he got that opportunity; whether it would be a bunch of expensive, hopeless, cloggers, or whether they'd be pretty good & he'd prove to be just as good as the overpaid foreign managers.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby Esky » Sat May 07, 2011 11:20 am

Ted Hughes wrote:Neil Warnock gets the job done yet again. Wonder if they'll allow him to spend money? Be interesting to see what kind of team he'd come up with if he got that opportunity; whether it would be a bunch of expensive, hopeless, cloggers, or whether they'd be pretty good & he'd prove to be just as good as the overpaid foreign managers.


Was reading a BBC article that said they've pretty much built the side around Taarabt this season and given him a free role. By all accounts they won't have the luxury of playing that way in the Prem. Should be interesting.

Pleased to hear there won't be a points deduction - it's the right decision.
User avatar
Esky
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4412
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Melbourne
Supporter of: The Blue Ship

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby Original Dub » Sat May 07, 2011 11:27 am

Taarabt is a future great. No doubt in my mind.
Original Dub
 

Re: qpr - point deduction?

Postby ant london » Sat May 07, 2011 11:29 am

Completely the right decision from the league/FA.

I'm pleased for them, by far and away the best performers in the Championship and it is laughable to say that their "offences" gained them any unfair advantage (a bit like Kolo and his diet pills if I'm honest) so I'm glad that sense has prevailed.

As to the sanctions to the chairman and any financial penalties, well those they will have to take on the chin.

Pleased for QPR and happy for Warnock. It'll be a great day out at Loftus Road too for everyone
Image
User avatar
ant london
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11505
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:01 pm
Location: Almaty
Supporter of: Cityski
My favourite player is: Mario Balotelli

Next

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Hazy2, Pretty Boy Lee and 104 guests