The mancityfans.net football forum

I know quite a lot of these ragas are like a dog with a bone when it comes to negative City press, but this crowd are definitely head and shoulders over the last month or so in particular. Obviously, someone upset them because its fucking ridiculous at this stage and someone from the club should get onto them at this stage.

The latest today is a split in the City hierarchy, coupled with 59 year old Seedorf rejecting our offer so he can stay with Milan.

Its a direct assault every day and there's one thing in brushing off idiots who have a dig from time to time and another to square up to an obvious agenda.

Cunts.

Any publicity is good publicity. I would rather have a laugh then not read anything about us at all.

We had a massive bag of bad press over the last season but it didn't stop us progressing forward.
Annoying but innefective. If anything, it helped the team circle the wagons, bond together and motivate them on to greater heights.

Myself and a another blue on Twitter are just having a go at Ian Ladyman for the shit the Mail is printing. Absolutely anything for a negative slant on anything at all.

Spot on about the Mail's crusade against us ... as I said the other day this can only be a good thing for any Muslims

Chinners wrote:Spot on about the Mail's crusade against us ... as I said the other day this can only be a good thing for any Muslims

Ha ha, true Chinners. Im sure they will move panic to spreading panic elsewhere in society when the transfer window closes.

Legions of new foreign fans will be trying to smuggle aboard the cross channel badwagon and claim asylum next, eating the queen's swans on free government gifted barbeques, while they do it. I'm scared and you should be too.

According to LOOKMUMIMATIT there are no papers or pundits that have an agenda against CITY..he said we are fuckign idiots if we think that way...he fucking said it..that man...that TIT Lookmum.



I thought Id bring this up as the cunt needs to be named when its fucking obvious they are out to get us.

Yesterdays back page was a split of 2 stories. The first was our bus parade with the headline City on parade....but guess who`s missing. Good news with a negative slant.

The bottom half of the page was about Cryan giggs with the headline Forgiving fergie. Bad news with a positive slant.

No bias then...

Sorry hadn't noticed this city related article from today... negative of course.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1390727/Manchester-Citys-Mario-Balotelli-nightclub-scuffle-Italy.html

So that's three negative stories in one day. Great journalism! Some poor little rag journo is not a happy chappy with the NKOTB (that's New Kids On The Block BTW and it takes nothing away from my coolness).

Well, keep adding all the bogies, solely from the Daily Fail in this thread... at this rate it should be hilarious come Christmas. And at that point, I'll email the cunts with a link to this thread :)

ooooo they all hate us..... siege mentality..... etc etc (who does that remind you of...?)

as a general rule - normal people know that whatever the daily mail prints appeals to a very small section of society, and contains very few facts. jeez.

Arjan Van Schotte wrote:ooooo they all hate us..... siege mentality..... etc etc (who does that remind you of...?)

as a general rule - normal people know that whatever the daily mail prints appeals to a very small section of society, and contains very few facts. jeez.

Two things:

1) I'm not normal
2) It seems there is an unusual amount of negative stories emerging lately from them in particular, so I thought I'd monitor it closely to see for sure...

I hope you don't mind my use of bandwith on this occasion. You doubt you're easily offended, I've seen your hair :-)

Original Dub wrote:

Arjan Van Schotte wrote:ooooo they all hate us..... siege mentality..... etc etc (who does that remind you of...?)

as a general rule - normal people know that whatever the daily mail prints appeals to a very small section of society, and contains very few facts. jeez.

Two things:

1) I'm not normal
2) It seems there is an unusual amount of negative stories emerging lately from them in particular, so I thought I'd monitor it closely to see for sure...

I hope you don't mind my use of bandwith on this occasion. You doubt you're easily offended, I've seen your hair :-)

two things:

1) the daily mail is the opium of the shiters - no-one except 65 year old white accountants believe anything they say.
2) fair enough - i'm just criticising your source.

you can have the bandwidth, i never said i wasn't easily offended, and i currently have a no.1 cut all over. you wank cats off, that's worse.

Their weekly TV pull out on a Saturday is best in class.

If you want an answer as to why they get away with writing this abomination to journalism, take a look at the post above mine.

Arjan Van Schotte wrote:

Original Dub wrote:

Arjan Van Schotte wrote:ooooo they all hate us..... siege mentality..... etc etc (who does that remind you of...?)

as a general rule - normal people know that whatever the daily mail prints appeals to a very small section of society, and contains very few facts. jeez.

Two things:

1) I'm not normal
2) It seems there is an unusual amount of negative stories emerging lately from them in particular, so I thought I'd monitor it closely to see for sure...

I hope you don't mind my use of bandwith on this occasion. You doubt you're easily offended, I've seen your hair :-)

two things:

1) the daily mail is the opium of the shiters - no-one except 65 year old white accountants believe anything they say.
2) fair enough - i'm just criticising your source.

you can have the bandwidth, i never said i wasn't easily offended, and i currently have a no.1 cut all over. you wank cats off, that's worse.

I never wanked a cat.

Original Dub wrote:

Arjan Van Schotte wrote:

Original Dub wrote:

Arjan Van Schotte wrote:ooooo they all hate us..... siege mentality..... etc etc (who does that remind you of...?)

as a general rule - normal people know that whatever the daily mail prints appeals to a very small section of society, and contains very few facts. jeez.

Two things:

1) I'm not normal
2) It seems there is an unusual amount of negative stories emerging lately from them in particular, so I thought I'd monitor it closely to see for sure...

I hope you don't mind my use of bandwith on this occasion. You doubt you're easily offended, I've seen your hair :-)

two things:

1) the daily mail is the opium of the shiters - no-one except 65 year old white accountants believe anything they say.
2) fair enough - i'm just criticising your source.

you can have the bandwidth, i never said i wasn't easily offended, and i currently have a no.1 cut all over. you wank cats off, that's worse.

I never wanked a cat.

I have got to try everything once.

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

Original Dub wrote:

Arjan Van Schotte wrote:

Original Dub wrote:

Arjan Van Schotte wrote:ooooo they all hate us..... siege mentality..... etc etc (who does that remind you of...?)

as a general rule - normal people know that whatever the daily mail prints appeals to a very small section of society, and contains very few facts. jeez.

Two things:

1) I'm not normal
2) It seems there is an unusual amount of negative stories emerging lately from them in particular, so I thought I'd monitor it closely to see for sure...

I hope you don't mind my use of bandwith on this occasion. You doubt you're easily offended, I've seen your hair :-)

two things:

1) the daily mail is the opium of the shiters - no-one except 65 year old white accountants believe anything they say.
2) fair enough - i'm just criticising your source.

you can have the bandwidth, i never said i wasn't easily offended, and i currently have a no.1 cut all over. you wank cats off, that's worse.

I never wanked a cat.

I have got to try everything once.

RESPECT.

Goaters 103 wrote:Myself and a another blue on Twitter are just having a go at Ian Ladyman for the shit the Mail is printing. Absolutely anything for a negative slant on anything at all.

Ian Ladyman is an absolute prick of the highest order and has had a massive anti-city agenda since the club served a banning order on him.

He can not bring himself to talk positively about our club even if we merit it and his supposed sources are "tomato" and "brown". Utter bullshit spreader of worst kind if their was any justice in the world he get sacked and never be allowed to work in the industry again.

Well done for giving him stick he bloody deserves it and much much more.

Neil Custis from The Sun needs a big haymaker in his head....Spouting loads of bad shit about us lately.
Were hated ya know...Oh yes we are ;-)