Page 1 of 1

Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:21 am
by Wonderwall
Thats a very shrewd move by Villas-Boas, a former player of the club and a former premiership manager to come in as 1st team coach. I would have thought Di Matteo would be looking for another managerial role and not to play second fiddle.

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 25,00.html

Re: Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:22 am
by Goaters 103
He will be on a big wedge, and if he does well, its not entirely impossible he could ultimately end up managing them. Smart appointment.

Re: Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:40 am
by Esky
Thought it was harsh that WBA sacked him last season, but I guess they were validated by the position Hodgson took them to.

Di Matteo can't really lose if he goes to Chelsea though - high wage, back in the spotlight, will be the likely successor if Villas-Boas fails there and can leave in a year if another decent team asks him to manage them anyway.

Re: Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:36 am
by Ted Hughes
That's a great move. Knows the Premier League, the lower leagues & knows Chelsea. I thought he did a great job with WBA. Just because he didn't choose to stick ten men behind the ball & play 'solid' safety first football & chose to concentrate on attacking first he's ended up out of a job.

Bit like Mark Hughes.

Re: Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:11 am
by Hazy2
Looking at it another way, It could mean the club have chosen the Ast. Manager, "Just in case it goes tits up. The owner has never medled before or has he ?

Re: Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:18 am
by PeterParker
If "Villa's Boss" will be sacked, guess who will fill the gap.

Re: Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:50 am
by aaron bond
From Chelsea's perspective, it's a great appointment. He'll help the new manager familiarise himself with English football and will be able to pass on both his experience as a player and a manager.

From Di Matteo's perspective, I'd have thought he'd want to remain as a manager, as opposed to somebody's assistant. I thought he was generally held in high regard, unless the offers haven't been that forthcoming since he left West Brom. Perhaps he has a clause in his contract that allows him to move on should he receive a good offer from another club to become their manager???

Re: Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 5:35 pm
by ross.mcfc
aaron bond wrote:From Chelsea's perspective, it's a great appointment. He'll help the new manager familiarise himself with English football and will be able to pass on both his experience as a player and a manager.

From Di Matteo's perspective, I'd have thought he'd want to remain as a manager, as opposed to somebody's assistant. I thought he was generally held in high regard, unless the offers haven't been that forthcoming since he left West Brom. Perhaps he has a clause in his contract that allows him to move on should he receive a good offer from another club to become their manager???


From what I read from foriegn journo's and not the arse lickers that work in the British tabliods who champion the guys who are they are really friendly with is that he completely lost the WBA players and his coaching methods are at best questionable. I love how our media big up the likes of Martin Jol, Chris Houghton as top managers. There's no proof of this. Lot's of evidence they are nice blokes and get on great with the media.

From his perspective it's a great move. I'd bet if it all goes tits up Villa's could be gone by xmas and Di Matteo get's a stab at the job. If it goes well the media will be raving about Di Matteo's infulence and what a great job he's doing.

Re: Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:29 pm
by Ted Hughes
ross.mcfc wrote:
aaron bond wrote:From Chelsea's perspective, it's a great appointment. He'll help the new manager familiarise himself with English football and will be able to pass on both his experience as a player and a manager.

From Di Matteo's perspective, I'd have thought he'd want to remain as a manager, as opposed to somebody's assistant. I thought he was generally held in high regard, unless the offers haven't been that forthcoming since he left West Brom. Perhaps he has a clause in his contract that allows him to move on should he receive a good offer from another club to become their manager???


From what I read from foriegn journo's and not the arse lickers that work in the British tabliods who champion the guys who are they are really friendly with is that he completely lost the WBA players and his coaching methods are at best questionable. I love how our media big up the likes of Martin Jol, Chris Houghton as top managers. There's no proof of this. Lot's of evidence they are nice blokes and get on great with the media.

From his perspective it's a great move. I'd bet if it all goes tits up Villa's could be gone by xmas and Di Matteo get's a stab at the job. If it goes well the media will be raving about Di Matteo's infulence and what a great job he's doing.



If the 'foreign journos' are correct, why would a club like Chelsea, who have an enormous infastructure & can pick & choose from hundreds of qualified applicants including many other ex players, choose him? They won't have done it for sentimental reasons.

Re: Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:41 pm
by ross.mcfc
Ted Hughes wrote:
ross.mcfc wrote:
aaron bond wrote:From Chelsea's perspective, it's a great appointment. He'll help the new manager familiarise himself with English football and will be able to pass on both his experience as a player and a manager.

From Di Matteo's perspective, I'd have thought he'd want to remain as a manager, as opposed to somebody's assistant. I thought he was generally held in high regard, unless the offers haven't been that forthcoming since he left West Brom. Perhaps he has a clause in his contract that allows him to move on should he receive a good offer from another club to become their manager???


From what I read from foriegn journo's and not the arse lickers that work in the British tabliods who champion the guys who are they are really friendly with is that he completely lost the WBA players and his coaching methods are at best questionable. I love how our media big up the likes of Martin Jol, Chris Houghton as top managers. There's no proof of this. Lot's of evidence they are nice blokes and get on great with the media.

From his perspective it's a great move. I'd bet if it all goes tits up Villa's could be gone by xmas and Di Matteo get's a stab at the job. If it goes well the media will be raving about Di Matteo's infulence and what a great job he's doing.


Gets the media onside? Someone to step in incase it all goes tits up? Same reason that people were suggesting Uwe Rosler gets a job with us?


If the 'foreign journos' are correct, why would a club like Chelsea, who have an enormous infastructure & can pick & choose from hundreds of qualified applicants including many other ex players, choose him? They won't have done it for sentimental reasons.

Re: Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:45 pm
by Ted Hughes
ross.mcfc wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:
ross.mcfc wrote:
aaron bond wrote:From Chelsea's perspective, it's a great appointment. He'll help the new manager familiarise himself with English football and will be able to pass on both his experience as a player and a manager.

From Di Matteo's perspective, I'd have thought he'd want to remain as a manager, as opposed to somebody's assistant. I thought he was generally held in high regard, unless the offers haven't been that forthcoming since he left West Brom. Perhaps he has a clause in his contract that allows him to move on should he receive a good offer from another club to become their manager???


From what I read from foriegn journo's and not the arse lickers that work in the British tabliods who champion the guys who are they are really friendly with is that he completely lost the WBA players and his coaching methods are at best questionable. I love how our media big up the likes of Martin Jol, Chris Houghton as top managers. There's no proof of this. Lot's of evidence they are nice blokes and get on great with the media.

From his perspective it's a great move. I'd bet if it all goes tits up Villa's could be gone by xmas and Di Matteo get's a stab at the job. If it goes well the media will be raving about Di Matteo's infulence and what a great job he's doing.


Gets the media onside? Someone to step in incase it all goes tits up? Same reason that people were suggesting Uwe Rosler gets a job with us?


If the 'foreign journos' are correct, why would a club like Chelsea, who have an enormous infastructure & can pick & choose from hundreds of qualified applicants including many other ex players, choose him? They won't have done it for sentimental reasons.
Gets the media onside? Someone to step in incase it all goes tits up? Same reason that people were suggesting Uwe Rosler gets a job with us?


I really don't think we, or any top club work like that. Minor role yes but he's been put right at the heart of the team.

Re: Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:33 pm
by Slim
Great move by Chelsea, shame he couldn't get a gig himself.

Re: Roberto Di Matteo to Chelsea

PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:14 am
by Hazy2
Ancelotti Scholari,Mouriniho, in such a short period. All winners all shown the door under very odd circumstances, AVB gone within 12 months Roman gone within 18months. Cheslsea gone , Wimbeldon/wiped out waiting to happen IMHO.