Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Nickyboy wrote:Goaters 103 wrote:Blue2 wrote:Easy, Tevez for Aguero.
Would be a great idea, but .... Athletico havent got a pot to piss in and cant afford £220k a week wages.
Sure I read somewhere the other day that Aguero was on 250k a week - not sure if that was quoted in euros though
Ok, Aguero had year and a half on his contract (if I remember correctly) and would have gone on the cheap. He agreed to massive pay rise with big release clause so that Athletico would get decent fee for him. Apparently he had told them early on that he'd be offski sooner or later. I seem to remember that's exactly what they did with Torres as well.
Athletico aren't broke ass but they aren't filthy rich team that can invest 250k/w and basically 40+m (the fee they'll get for Aguero) on Tevez who will only stay in Europe for few years and then bugger off to South America for peanuts. That's just stupid "investment" club like Athletico aren't going to make.
He is on over £5m/year after tax, so they can afford the wages. People keep harking back to the spanish tax laws, but the old system was binned a couple of years ago, and thereore the tax advantage that Spain enjoyed no longer exists, so he is on approximately £180k/week before tax on this new contract.
However, in this case it could be said that they are only paying these wages because they kow they would benefit from a transfer in the near future which would recoup the outlay.
Interestingly, his buyout clause value was reduced after the new contract was renegotiated, and the buyout clause only actually applies to Spanish clubs as the clause is a legal requirement in Spain. Therefore I doubt very much City would pay anything like £38m to sign him