Page 1 of 1
SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:12 pmby King Kev
Either his account has been hacked or he is a fucking knobhead!
I can see him getting into a lot of trouble because of this.
Warning: Attachment contains nudity.
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:21 pmby craigmcfc
Either hacked or fake. I've just looked on his twitter and can't see any of those tweets on there unless it's from a while ago.
Anyway, the girl on the left must have it in up to her tits!
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:23 pmby King Kev
craigmcfc wrote:Either hacked or fake. I've just looked on his twitter and can't see any of those tweets on there unless it's from a while ago.
Anyway, the girl on the left must have it in up to her tits!
Definitely not fake mate, I took the screenshot myself. He has deleted it now but the damage will have been done.
I wonder how many of his 31000 followers are kids? He needs to grow up.
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:24 pmby craigmcfc
King Kev wrote:craigmcfc wrote:Either hacked or fake. I've just looked on his twitter and can't see any of those tweets on there unless it's from a while ago.
Anyway, the girl on the left must have it in up to her tits!
Definitely not fake mate, I took the screenshot myself. He has deleted it now but the damage will be done.
He needs to grow up.
Then he is a complete muppet and the bright lights down there have got to him already
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:24 pmby HeyMark
Was gonna start this thread myself. He retweeted it as a bet apparenltly, fckin idiot!
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:04 pmby Lev Bronstein
Didn't he put some money into a porn channel a few years back when he was with Chelsea?
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:18 pmby Blue Blood
Oh dear, oh dear.
Silly SWP.
Up to QPR to release a statement now though. Phew.
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:30 pmby Lee_R
Lol thats got me in the mood.
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:37 pmby CityGer
Far nicer than Jessica Ennis.
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:54 pmby Beefymcfc
I've just realised that you can zoom in on it. Cool.
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 5:54 pmby Crossie
JESSICA POO'S PETALS
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:36 pmby Sister of fu
I thought it was funny but I always laugh at inappropriate things.
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 7:05 pmby halnone
CityGer wrote:Far nicer than Jessica Ennis.
haha i agree
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 7:15 pmby shawzy
Thought it was funny but i cant see QPR giggling about it.
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 8:23 pmby Mase
He's never been the brightest of bulbs though has he? He can barely string a sentence together!
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:10 pmby The Man In Blue
Must have been pissed.
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:19 pmby Chopper
I don't see the problem?
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:36 pmby city9_4eva
cant see the image? can someone explain to me what hes done?
Re: SWP On Twitter (NOT safe for work!)
Posted:
Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:00 pmby razor400
city9_4eva wrote:cant see the image? can someone explain to me what hes done?
Just posted a picture of a couple of plumbers, well the had plungers anyway.