Page 1 of 2
5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:36 pm
by Dronny
..which means more?
We've lived off the 5-1 for so long because it was a beacon to us in a period of uncertainty, will the 6-1 ever eclipse it?
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:36 pm
by ENIAM NAM
Urrrm.
Yes!
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:41 pm
by Piccsnumberoneblue
Probably not.
I expected us to score four today. In 89 I went thinking we'd get leathered.
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:43 pm
by Dronny
ENIAM NAM wrote:Urrrm.
Yes!
Furry muff, but, think what the 5-1 meant and how often we will achieve this kind of score???
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:46 pm
by Douglas Higginbottom
Dronny wrote:ENIAM NAM wrote:Urrrm.
Yes!
Furry muff, but, think what the 5-1 meant and how often we will achieve this kind of score???
6.1 is a massive statement and even if the score is a bit wild it reflects the fact that we are the better team NOW.
The 5.1 was massive but it could be argued it was just one of those games.
We have now gone 5.1 at Spurs,4 nil v BBurn in away games already this year so I don't think wins/scores like this have to be one offs.
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:47 pm
by simon12
7-1 edin missed a sitter.
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:52 pm
by Dronny
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Dronny wrote:ENIAM NAM wrote:Urrrm.
Yes!
Furry muff, but, think what the 5-1 meant and how often we will achieve this kind of score???
6.1 is a massive statement and even if the score is a bit wild it reflects the fact that we are the better team NOW.
The 5.1 was massive but it could be argued it was just one of those games.
We have now gone 5.1 at Spurs,4 nil v BBurn in away games already this year so I don't think wins/scores like this have to be one offs.
My point Doug, the 5-1 was a one off and meant so much because it was SO out of the ordinary. I believe that with the team we have now these scores will become the norm ( may be not beating the filth 6-1). I will never forget that day in Sept 89 and nor will I forget today but I think think '89 might linger longer!
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:06 pm
by King Kev
Before the 5-1 we were shite, they were good, nobody gave us a hope in hell. It was more of a shock and surprise than today and therefore meant more to the fans at the time.
Today was pretty good though.
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:19 pm
by lets all have a disco
After the first 20 minutes i knew we was going to fuck them over,why?
We are pure quality.
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:40 pm
by gillie
Funniley enough i said today that the 89 result was better merely because of how we were in the league at the time.
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:46 pm
by lets all have a disco
On a side note it should have been 8.
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:50 pm
by freshie
The fact that we did this away from home makes it better than the 5-1 at Maine Road in my opinion. Not to mention all the records that we obliterated with this result
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:50 pm
by Blue Jam
Anyone remember 9/11/3, Goats 100th goal in the last ever derby at Maine Road?
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:09 pm
by SORTED
Dronny wrote:..which means more?
We've lived off the 5-1 for so long because it was a beacon to us in a period of uncertainty, will the 6-1 ever eclipse it?
You are having a giraffe aren't ya?
We inflicted United’s biggest home defeat on them since 1955; equal biggest since 1927!
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:18 pm
by ronk
Dronny wrote:
My point Doug, the 5-1 was a one off and meant so much because it was SO out of the ordinary. I believe that with the team we have now these scores will become the norm ( may be not beating the filth 6-1). I will never forget that day in Sept 89 and nor will I forget today but I think think '89 might linger longer!
Today wasn't necessarily a one-off, in some ways that makes it more special. This changes things because it's not a freak result, it's just a good one.
It may meld into one of many good days, but it's still symbolic. The 5-1 stands out as a lesser peak in a barren and featureless landscape.
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:20 am
by LookMumImOnMCF.net
I think I saw a guy leave after 89 minutes so the victory was soured for me.
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:54 am
by Dameerto
SORTED wrote:Dronny wrote:..which means more?
We've lived off the 5-1 for so long because it was a beacon to us in a period of uncertainty, will the 6-1 ever eclipse it?
You are having a giraffe aren't ya?
We inflicted United’s biggest home defeat on them since 1955; equal biggest since 1927!
And if that wasn't enough, the whiskey soaked red faced (even redder than usual today) old fart has admitted on camera that today was his worst moment as a manager.
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:55 am
by Dameerto
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:I think I saw a guy leave after 89 minutes so the victory was soured for me.
RAGs were bailing out from 0-3 onwards
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:34 am
by Kladze
The 6-1 for me.
To completely and utterly thrash them in front of 70,000 of their own near silent fans was even better than my wildest dreams.
Re: 5-1 or 6-1...

Posted:
Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:56 am
by Slim
Dameerto wrote:SORTED wrote:Dronny wrote:..which means more?
We've lived off the 5-1 for so long because it was a beacon to us in a period of uncertainty, will the 6-1 ever eclipse it?
You are having a giraffe aren't ya?
We inflicted United’s biggest home defeat on them since 1955; equal biggest since 1927!
And if that wasn't enough, the whiskey soaked red faced (even redder than usual today) old fart has admitted on camera that today was his
worst moment as a manager.
Prepare for that record to be smashed as well.