The mancityfans.net football forum

Chelski just got a penalty and i left the room, i couldn''t handle this disgrace.

Our last three away games:

At QPR: ref: Martin Atkinson

- suspicious second goal scored by QPR
- overall decision made for QPR

At Liverpool: ref Martin Atkinson

- Balotelli sent off after a shocking decision
- Almost every dive from Suarez was given a fault
- overall decision given in favor of Scouse

At Chelski: ref the Cunt

- not given penalty for us
- no red card for Meirelles
- free first yellow card for Clichy
- imaginary penalty for Chelski


And we are only in december....

And no neutral observers will flag it up because "They've spent millions".

PeterParker wrote:imaginary penalty for Chelski

It was a stone wall penalty.

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:imaginary penalty for Chelski

It was a stone wall penalty.

It was

the ref missed the silva peno but ya ya was also lucky to stay on,their penalty would have been given by any ref, should not have his hands in the air,

It was a stone wall penalty. Clattenburg was still horrendous though, for both sides. No consistency at all.

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:imaginary penalty for Chelski

It was a stone wall penalty.

Don't like the example, but Spuds had more clear penalty that this yesterday when Woodgate used his hand to prevent a goal. Lesco had a poor game, but he was with his back at the ball.

Look at the reaction Clattercunt had when he indicated the spot, he was having an orgasm ffs.

PeterParker wrote:

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:imaginary penalty for Chelski

It was a stone wall penalty.

Don't like the example, but Spuds had more clear penalty that this yesterday when Woodgate used his hand to prevent a goal. Lesco had a poor game, but he was with his back at the ball.

With two hands in the air.

bluej wrote:It was a stone wall penalty. Clattenburg was still horrendous though, for both sides. No consistency at all.

this.
we can't complain (much) about the stuff like him not sending off Meireles when Yaya should've been off too. we should've got the penalty though...

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:imaginary penalty for Chelski

It was a stone wall penalty.

Don't like the example, but Spuds had more clear penalty that this yesterday when Woodgate used his hand to prevent a goal. Lesco had a poor game, but he was with his back at the ball.

With two hands in the air.

He jumped and put his hands in front of his face. How many times did we saw the same situation and a penalty was not given?

PeterParker wrote:

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:imaginary penalty for Chelski

It was a stone wall penalty.

Don't like the example, but Spuds had more clear penalty that this yesterday when Woodgate used his hand to prevent a goal. Lesco had a poor game, but he was with his back at the ball.

With two hands in the air.

He jumped and put his hands in front of his face. How many times did we saw the same situation and a penalty was not given?

Oh give over. Agree with you on other points but he jumped with his arms in the air stopping the flight of the ball. If that's not handball I don't know what the fuck is.

lescott has got his hands in the air and the ball hits his hands. I don't think we have much to complain about on that front.

we do have quite a lot to complain about the non-call against silva however ... pretty ridiculous. we should have been up 2-0 by that time anyway though. game changing.

Fulham and Liverpool come to mind, and now Chelsea. Two points from nine. Bad refs certainly don't help, but tonight we were very, very poor. We just can't defend, and Joe Hart can't save our sorry arses every time.

The Bosingwa tackle on Silva looks more of a pen every time I see it. Clattenberg's positioning was perfect.

Cunt

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:
Oh give over. Agree with you on other points but he jumped with his arms in the air stopping the flight of the ball. If that's not handball I don't know what the fuck is.

Imho was a 50/50 decision, but as usual given against us.

We got one the other week when Balo went for a shot and it hit the defenders arm. Can't complain about the pen.

The ref in general was a fuckin useless piece of fuckin shit who should be taught a very harsh lesson by having to ref a Sunday fuckin league match and see what the players do to him there when he acts the way he does.

kinkylola wrote:lescott has got his hands in the air and the ball hits his hands. I don't think we have much to complain about on that front.

we do have quite a lot to complain about the non-call against silva however ... pretty ridiculous. we should have been up 2-0 by that time anyway though. game changing.

spot on, 2-0 after 25 mins it would have been game over. We battered them for 25, but a combination of not giving a red to Meireles and not giving the pen changed the game. Clettenburg is so inconsistent its unbelievable

Forget the ref, regardless of who it is these fuckers work for the Premier League. Do you honestly think that they'll gve us the rub of the green. It's part of life, get fcking used to it.

We only lost because we played with 10 men against 12, it won't change.

PeterParker wrote:

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:
Oh give over. Agree with you on other points but he jumped with his arms in the air stopping the flight of the ball. If that's not handball I don't know what the fuck is.

Imho was a 50/50 decision, but as usual given against us.

50/50? Wtf are you on about. Guarantee 100% if that was a Chelsea player you'd scream for a penalty. His arms are up in the air and stop the shot from coming in. Stonewall.

PeterParker wrote:

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:imaginary penalty for Chelski

It was a stone wall penalty.

Don't like the example, but Spuds had more clear penalty that this yesterday when Woodgate used his hand to prevent a goal. Lesco had a poor game, but he was with his back at the ball.

With two hands in the air.

He jumped and put his hands in front of his face. How many times did we saw the same situation and a penalty was not given?

I think you will find that if a player raises his arms above his chest and the ball hits in the hands it will be a penalty 99.99% of the time no matter who the team or ref is.