Page 1 of 2
How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:38 pm
by guv111
The Rags are poor, but they still have Evra, Nani, Vidic, Jones and Rooney, who are better than Nasri, Johnson, Savic, Lescott and Dzeko. Man for man. In my opinion.
Yep, another thread mentioning the Rags. They're joint top with us, so obviously.
Maybe today and recent games should awake us aware of the fact that we don't have such a fantastic squad, after all. We really do need to improve it.
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:42 pm
by Beeks
guv111 wrote:The Rags are poor, but they still have Evra, Nani, Vidic, Jones and Rooney, who are better than Nasri, Johnson, Savic, Lescott and Dzeko. Man for man. In my opinion.
Yep, another thread mentioning the Rags. They're joint top with us, so obviously.
Maybe today and recent games should awake us to the fact that we don't have such a fantastic squad, after all. We really do need to improve it.
To be 'honest guv' aside from me being royally fucked off
We battered them today..it was just one of them days
And we WILL have them
Every team does at some point in the season
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:44 pm
by ruralblue
Two of those have only been with the squad 6 months or less. Yes you could say Nasri played in the Prem already but given time I am sure he will bed in. Savic is only young and as only had six starts and five or so sub appearances. To early to tell if they will be up to it, give them time. Plus Phil Jones aside you have made comparisons to seasoned rags who are up there with they're best 5 players.
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:44 pm
by Ted Hughes
Five players who could get in our squad out of twenty odd isn't that great tbh.
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:45 pm
by PeterParker
They could had scored with those two huge opportunities. Imho, at Wba was one ot those days.
Today wasen't.
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:45 pm
by Crossie
Nasri IS the French Adam Johnson
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:46 pm
by guv111
Beeks wrote:guv111 wrote:The Rags are poor, but they still have Evra, Nani, Vidic, Jones and Rooney, who are better than Nasri, Johnson, Savic, Lescott and Dzeko. Man for man. In my opinion.
Yep, another thread mentioning the Rags. They're joint top with us, so obviously.
Maybe today and recent games should awake us to the fact that we don't have such a fantastic squad, after all. We really do need to improve it.
To be 'honest guv' aside from me being royally fucked off
We battered them today..it was just one of them days
And we WILL have them
Every team does at some point in the season
Weren't the Chelsea (largely) and West Brom games just the same?
This is a definite blip. We're okay so far, but we can't keep doing this.
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:48 pm
by Ted Hughes
PeterParker wrote:They could had scored with those two huge opportunities. Imho, at Wba was one ot those days.
Today wasen't.
It's fair comment that they should have scored but it was still 'one of those days'. We are capable of doing much better.
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 7:26 pm
by aaron bond
guv111 wrote:The Rags are poor, but they still have Evra, Nani, Vidic, Jones and Rooney, who are better than Nasri, Johnson, Savic, Lescott and Dzeko. Man for man. In my opinion.
Yep, another thread mentioning the Rags. They're joint top with us, so obviously.
Maybe today and recent games should awake us aware of the fact that we don't have such a fantastic squad, after all. We really do need to improve it.
You list United's 5 best players and compare them with 4 players who don't start that often for us (plus Lescott)???
Any more pearls of wisdom?
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 7:37 pm
by guv111
aaron bond wrote:guv111 wrote:The Rags are poor, but they still have Evra, Nani, Vidic, Jones and Rooney, who are better than Nasri, Johnson, Savic, Lescott and Dzeko. Man for man. In my opinion.
Yep, another thread mentioning the Rags. They're joint top with us, so obviously.
Maybe today and recent games should awake us aware of the fact that we don't have such a fantastic squad, after all. We really do need to improve it.
You list United's 5 best players and compare them with 4 players who don't start that often for us (plus Lescott)???
Any more pearls of wisdom?
Mmm, loads.
Such as we're only as good as the team we put out in any given game - which seems to be our best eleven, with little leeway. As we saw today, their stand-ins weren't good enough. It's well known that our main opponents - Rags, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal and Spurs - lack strength in depth, but we weren't supposed to. Even neutral commentators "ooh and aah" at our bench. Frankly, I don't any more.
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:52 pm
by 1950
Frankly, you're full of shit.
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:03 pm
by ashton287
We can't fucking buy a goal at the minute so i think the BLIP is our strikers being fucking faggots. Balo is the only one who seems capable and willing to actually try. Aguero (since he changed his boots) has needed 3 1 on 1's, 2 open nets and 5 other chances to get a shot on fucking target and dzeko seems to be our very own super special limited edition berbatov.
When balo is fit again (heard he is injured but not sure) drop the 2 queers and let balo have the spotlight, we all know he fucking loves the spotlight. Make a statement about resting on you lorals or whatever and try getting them all back firing for the second haf of the season.
EDIT* After reading i realised which thread i was in and this has fuck all to do with the thread. Shit thread anyway though so i dont care. The rags are wank and sunderland would of beat them by more than an offside 93rd minute goal if they had played them today (especially since that cheating orange cunt went off early)
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:09 pm
by guv111
1950 wrote:Frankly, you're full of shit.
That's just a shitty troll comment. Either explain why, or fuck off to some far worse City site, because with comments like that you're contributing nothing here.
Fucking idiot.
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:19 pm
by 1950
You got told already, but I'll repeat it gladly. What is the point of comparing their best players to our bench?
Our bench, obviously, is not as good as our first eleven. Neither is theirs. Does today's result make their bench better?
What is the point of this thread?
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:26 pm
by guv111
1950 wrote:You got told already, but I'll repeat it gladly. What is the point of comparing their best players to our bench?
Our bench, obviously, is not as good as our first eleven. Neither is theirs. Does today's result make their bench better?
What is the point of this thread?
Start your own thread, then. I notice that so-called fans who troll other people's threads never start any of their own.
How much longer can you, and people like you, get away with saying "What is the point of this thread?" re. everything they disagree with?
No offence, but you are a fucking clown. Agree or disagree with other people's opinions, but to make snide comments about the validity of starting threads is cunt-ish.
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:29 pm
by LookMumImOnMCF.net
Probably about a point?
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:38 pm
by 1950
guv111 wrote:1950 wrote:You got told already, but I'll repeat it gladly. What is the point of comparing their best players to our bench?
Our bench, obviously, is not as good as our first eleven. Neither is theirs. Does today's result make their bench better?
What is the point of this thread?
Start your own thread, then. I notice that so-called fans who troll other people's threads never start any of their own.
How much longer can you, and people like you, get away with saying "What is the point of this thread?" re. everything they disagree with?
No offence, but you are a fucking clown. Agree or disagree with other people's opinions, but to make snide comments about the validity of starting threads is cunt-ish.
I'm not going to start my own thread because I don't want to waste other people's time if I don't have anything to say. I don't disagree with you. How could I? You don't even make a valid point! Man for man my arse. How about this man for man:
Nasri v Young
Johnson v Park
Savic v Evans
Lescott v Ferdinand
Dzeko v Berbatov
If you questioned our quality that way or similar, I wouldn't bother you or this topic. But you're not. Your opening post is pointless, you get called on it & then don't even bother to respond. You're full of shit.
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:49 pm
by aaron bond
guv111 wrote:aaron bond wrote:guv111 wrote:The Rags are poor, but they still have Evra, Nani, Vidic, Jones and Rooney, who are better than Nasri, Johnson, Savic, Lescott and Dzeko. Man for man. In my opinion.
Yep, another thread mentioning the Rags. They're joint top with us, so obviously.
Maybe today and recent games should awake us aware of the fact that we don't have such a fantastic squad, after all. We really do need to improve it.
You list United's 5 best players and compare them with 4 players who don't start that often for us (plus Lescott)???
Any more pearls of wisdom?
Mmm, loads.
Such as we're only as good as the team we put out in any given game - which seems to be our best eleven, with little leeway. As we saw today, their stand-ins weren't good enough. It's well known that our main opponents - Rags, Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal and Spurs - lack strength in depth, but we weren't supposed to. Even neutral commentators "ooh and aah" at our bench. Frankly, I don't any more.
Your point now is different to what you initially wrote. In your opening post, you compared United's best players to some of our squad players. Now you're talking about our squad depth vs. our competitors (which is a reasonable discussion to have). You've just not been very clear, that's all.
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:33 pm
by DoomMerchant
ashton287 wrote:We can't fucking buy a goal at the minute so i think the BLIP is our strikers being fucking faggots. Balo is the only one who seems capable and willing to actually try. Aguero (since he changed his boots) has needed 3 1 on 1's, 2 open nets and 5 other chances to get a shot on fucking target and dzeko seems to be our very own super special limited edition berbatov.
When balo is fit again (heard he is injured but not sure) drop the 2 queers and let balo have the spotlight, we all know he fucking loves the spotlight. Make a statement about resting on you lorals or whatever and try getting them all back firing for the second haf of the season.
EDIT* After reading i realised which thread i was in and this has fuck all to do with the thread. Shit thread anyway though so i dont care. The rags are wank and sunderland would of beat them by more than an offside 93rd minute goal if they had played them today (especially since that cheating orange cunt went off early)
how much cock our strikers are sucking probably has little to do with their accuracy in front of goal. Just so you know.
cheers
Re: How much better are we - really?

Posted:
Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:20 am
by ashton287
DoomMerchant wrote:
how much cock our strikers are sucking probably has little to do with their accuracy in front of goal. Just so you know.
cheers
How do you know? Malaria fucked drogba up so the HIV could do the same to our strikers. FACT.