Page 1 of 3

Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:00 pm
by Fidel Castro
Boateng - judging on performances for Germany, was hopeful he would be mint. Turned out to be a shit mard arse
Kolarov - Mistake
Savic - Joke

So far, Clichy has been the only succesful signing Mancini has made in defence. Still love Mancini and think he is mint, but starting to think he doesn´t know what a defender is if one slapped him in the face

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:06 pm
by CityGer
A £22 Mil outlay on Kolarov and Savic is starting to look like diabolical business.

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:08 pm
by Nigels Tackle
add clichy to that list... not convinced by him either.

onouha would have done a far better job than savic tonight. useless.

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:10 pm
by Mike J
Nigels Tackle wrote:add clichy to that list... not convinced by him either.

onouha would have done a far better job than savic tonight. useless.

clichy seriously!!? i thought he was one of our best performers tonight! shit load of effort as well! top player.

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:11 pm
by Tokyo Blue
In his defence ( no pun intended), Mancini did fuck boateng off sharpish at a profit and Kolarov is a wing-back rather than an out-and-out defender.

Savic, well, I don't know what is going on there.

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:11 pm
by london blue 2
Mike J wrote:
Nigels Tackle wrote:add clichy to that list... not convinced by him either.

onouha would have done a far better job than savic tonight. useless.

clichy seriously!!? i thought he was one of our best performers tonight! shit load of effort as well! top player.

Clicky was quality.

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:12 pm
by zuricity
Fidel Castro wrote:Boateng - judging on performances for Germany, was hopeful he would be mint. Turned out to be a shit mard arse
Kolarov - Mistake
Savic - Joke

So far, Clichy has been the only succesful signing Mancini has made in defence. Still love Mancini and think he is mint, but starting to think he doesn´t know what a defender is if one slapped him in the face


How's this for an argument. Lescott and Kompany are the weakest links ?. Kompany two red cards and a couple of yellows and lescott doesn't step up when his partner is sent off ! Didn't track Rooney, an easy thing to do as a defender....

Does a defender really need to react the way Kompany did with a good structured defense? I agree it was no foul , but shadowing the player, so far out from goal is easy.

Both Lescott and Kompany were bought by Hughes... (For the Mancini swipe).

Come on ! In all honesty, Savic made a mistake, sure, but the defense was at sixes and sevens for two successive corners.

Also where was gaz baz tonight ?

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:12 pm
by guv111
Clichy was a papering over the cracks signing. Mancini has been almost as wasteful as Hughes at times. Our squad is veneer thin. The difference is that at least Mancini seems to have some sort of idea what he is doing, tactically.

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:20 pm
by Moonchesteri
london blue 2 wrote:
Mike J wrote: i thought he was one of our best performers tonight! shit load of effort as well! top player.

Clicky was quality.


agree with you lads.

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:34 pm
by zuricity
guv111 wrote:Clichy was a papering over the cracks signing. Mancini has been almost as wasteful as Hughes at times. Our squad is veneer thin. The difference is that at least Mancini seems to have some sort of idea what he is doing, tactically.


What ? We are top of the league. Going into a relatively easy feb and march.

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:35 pm
by Fidel Castro
zuricity wrote:
guv111 wrote:Clichy was a papering over the cracks signing. Mancini has been almost as wasteful as Hughes at times. Our squad is veneer thin. The difference is that at least Mancini seems to have some sort of idea what he is doing, tactically.


What ? We are top of the league. Going into a relatively easy feb and march.


I know. We are mint. BUT I do think his record signing defenders is looking pretty shit.

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:36 pm
by guv111
zuricity wrote:
guv111 wrote:Clichy was a papering over the cracks signing. Mancini has been almost as wasteful as Hughes at times. Our squad is veneer thin. The difference is that at least Mancini seems to have some sort of idea what he is doing, tactically.


What ? We are top of the league. Going into a relatively easy feb and march.


Yes, I know. Now, with injuries, suspensions and the ACN we are being tested. We need to knuckle down and not leave our proper players too much to do when they get back.

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:37 pm
by london blue 2
zuricity wrote:
guv111 wrote:Clichy was a papering over the cracks signing. Mancini has been almost as wasteful as Hughes at times. Our squad is veneer thin. The difference is that at least Mancini seems to have some sort of idea what he is doing, tactically.


What ? We are top of the league. Going into a relatively easy feb and march.

Haha ridiculous comment. Best defence in the league (or there abouts)

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:37 pm
by Spurge
A weeks along time in football.

When we beat L'pool last week we had the tightest defence in the league, now we are listing all our shit defenders.

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:42 pm
by lets all have a disco
We should have signed Enrique.

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:44 pm
by DoomMerchant
lets all have a disco wrote:We should have signed Enrique.


with the ponytail.

cheers

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:47 pm
by Vantage
lets all have a disco wrote:We should have signed Enrique.


Please tell me you forgot the smiley face?

How is Micah not in the England starting XI?

Bad day at the office missing four key players either absent or injured. We'll do 'em at klu klux klanfield!

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:47 pm
by Green & Blue
Kolrov cant defend end of.savic is still learning but is exposed far to often for my liking.sometimes he has really impressed me but at times he leaves me wondering.Clichy on the other hand is prob the best bit of business we have ever done.years ahead of him and the best left back in the league right now

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:51 pm
by Chinners
Is it just me or is this Klansfield bollox just no funny in the slightest?

Re: Mancini defence signings

PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:07 pm
by colonel_muck
give savic a fucking break he's young and hasn't had a run in the side. lescott was shit for ages until kolo got banned for smacking up and showed he could step up to the plate. happy to give him these next three games and see how he fairs.

kolarov i cannot defend. most of his 'deliveries' of late have been woeful and he just stands off wingers until they go past him when he brings them down, or they just whip the ball around him. has had very long runs in the side and never truly impressed, so i'm confident in saying its probably not gonna work out between us. get a youth with bags of enthusiasm and energy as a stand in for clichy.

mancini does deserve a wee bit of criticism in the defensive department he's failed with his full back buys in my opinion (except clichy, though i don't think he's a mint as many of you make out still a decent player).