The mancityfans.net football forum

liverpool had the first two, we had savic.

we wasted 45 mins with savic on the pitch.

still cant believe we let bellamy go for fuck all. what a great player, would love him to still be with us.

Mike J wrote:still cant believe we let bellamy go for fuck all. what a great player, would love him to still be with us.

Pretty much. A bigger loss than Adebayor.

I honestly don't think we can afford to give Savic time to develop this season if we're serious about winning the league. I want to be kind, but he's a long, long way from where we need to be, youngster or not.

Mike J wrote:still cant believe we let bellamy go for fuck all. what a great player, would love him to still be with us.

Not for fuck all. 7 or 8 mil I think. Bellers/mancini was not on the same length wve. Think he needed a neckless.

Redna wrote:

Mike J wrote:still cant believe we let bellamy go for fuck all. what a great player, would love him to still be with us.

Not for fuck all. 7 or 8 mil I think. Bellers/mancini was not on the same length wve. Think he needed a neckless.

we didnt get anything like 7 0r 8 million for him. it literally was fuck all wasnt it?!

Bellamy >>>> Johnson + Nasri + Dzeko

We wasted another 90 minutes in the first leg, pal.

Liverpool are useless at converting their chances. Too bad Savic gifted them one penalty & Dowd the other.

1950 wrote:We wasted another 90 minutes in the first leg, pal.

Liverpool are useless at converting their chances. Too bad Savic gifted them one penalty & Dowd the other.

*like*

Bellamy knew to run at Savic and that was our weakness at the back.

I didn't want Beller's to go but come on, Beller's or Mancini? If we let him go for nothing then it says a lot about the relationship; it just wasn't working.

Beller's put himself through shit tonight to prove a point and won't be in again for the weekend. He wanted to beat us, he's no longer City player, let him go.

Bellers was'nt the difference our shite defence was end of.

Beefymcfc wrote:I didn't want Beller's to go but come on, Beller's or Mancini? If we let him go for nothing then it says a lot about the relationship; it just wasn't working.

Beller's put himself through shit tonight to prove a point and won't be in again for the weekend. He wanted to beat us, he's no longer City player, let him go.

Bellers was a brilliant player for City and ill never forget that...A good Hughes signing but (like you mention) not to Mancini's liking so we must all respect that and move on.

Savic is a kid replacing our captain while he's banned..I would of preferred Ned tonight but hey ho.

Bellers was indeed a great player for City, however, he had to go as Mancini's strict personality clashed with Bellamy's. Regardless, he's a great player and gets too much hate from a lot of people (not necessarily us, but in general terms).