twosips wrote:I genuinely thought he looked good in the games he played for us, though rough round the edges. He was better than Birmingham and Wolves' midfield when he played then, and he was even younger. No reason to believe he's not better now too. I wonder if he does have a genuine chance as Yaya's understudy. I'd love it if so.
How good would it be if Rekik, Razak and Guidetti all saved us fifteen/twenty million pounds each?
twosips wrote:I genuinely thought he looked good in the games he played for us, though rough round the edges. He was better than Birmingham and Wolves' midfield when he played then, and he was even younger. No reason to believe he's not better now too. I wonder if he does have a genuine chance as Yaya's understudy. I'd love it if so.
How good would it be if Rekik, Razak and Guidetti all saved us fifteen/twenty million pounds each?
bigblue wrote:twosips wrote:I genuinely thought he looked good in the games he played for us, though rough round the edges. He was better than Birmingham and Wolves' midfield when he played then, and he was even younger. No reason to believe he's not better now too. I wonder if he does have a genuine chance as Yaya's understudy. I'd love it if so.
How good would it be if Rekik, Razak and Guidetti all saved us fifteen/twenty million pounds each?
I think Razak and Rekik can defiantly slot in in a few years and be key figures for a long time to come. Both have looked excellent for their age (and very good even if you don't consider their age). And very encouraging to read that Brighton thread
You can hear Poyet talking about Razak from the 2:30 mark: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17093391
And an interview here, but you have to pay for it: http://www.seagulls.co.uk/articles/2012 ... ~1,00.html
The thought of have a player potentially similar to Yaya available, just when Yaya may be wearing down, makes me feel very good about the future
twosips wrote:My mate's a Brighton fan and he was absolutely raving about Razak's performance yesterday.
So I went on their forum and they absolutely love him.
http://www.northstandchat.com/showthrea ... Sign/page6
I knew he was good, but is he really as promising as they're all suggesting? Thoughts?
Doug - how does he often look in training? If he doesn't look out of place, then I guess by default he must be good, seeing as we're the team at the top of the league....but i dunno. Just seem surprised by this level of hyperbole!
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
He doesnt look out of place in training but I think some perspective is needed here. He just got a rave report from a Brighton game which if I am right is a championship game rather than a prem game.He certainly does have good qualities and his strength is possibly his main one but I can 100% assure everyone he is not the next Yaya.Not even close.
Also I note Poyet was very impressed with his passing which is one of the things I would have said he needed a lot of work on.If I had to look in a crystal ball I would say he could well make a premiership level but not a top 4 level.I wouldn't worry if he was part of our squad but I think that might be as far as he gets with us. A loan deal like this where he plays regularly is just what he and City need to find out how good he is.
Blue Since 76 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
He doesnt look out of place in training but I think some perspective is needed here. He just got a rave report from a Brighton game which if I am right is a championship game rather than a prem game.He certainly does have good qualities and his strength is possibly his main one but I can 100% assure everyone he is not the next Yaya.Not even close.
Also I note Poyet was very impressed with his passing which is one of the things I would have said he needed a lot of work on.If I had to look in a crystal ball I would say he could well make a premiership level but not a top 4 level.I wouldn't worry if he was part of our squad but I think that might be as far as he gets with us. A loan deal like this where he plays regularly is just what he and City need to find out how good he is.
Being able to loan promising youngsters to championship sides rather than having to play them ourselves should have a good impact on their development.
Too many of our youngsters have been thrown in and been hero worshipped as we were so desperate for success (Barton, SWP, Richards, Ireland, Johnson etc).
The rags have used loans for years to sort out the quality from the journeymen and it's not a bad model to follow. Can also be useful to convince championship sides to sell good youngsters if you can grease their palms with a few kids for a while.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Blue Since 76 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
He doesnt look out of place in training but I think some perspective is needed here. He just got a rave report from a Brighton game which if I am right is a championship game rather than a prem game.He certainly does have good qualities and his strength is possibly his main one but I can 100% assure everyone he is not the next Yaya.Not even close.
Also I note Poyet was very impressed with his passing which is one of the things I would have said he needed a lot of work on.If I had to look in a crystal ball I would say he could well make a premiership level but not a top 4 level.I wouldn't worry if he was part of our squad but I think that might be as far as he gets with us. A loan deal like this where he plays regularly is just what he and City need to find out how good he is.
Being able to loan promising youngsters to championship sides rather than having to play them ourselves should have a good impact on their development.
Too many of our youngsters have been thrown in and been hero worshipped as we were so desperate for success (Barton, SWP, Richards, Ireland, Johnson etc).
The rags have used loans for years to sort out the quality from the journeymen and it's not a bad model to follow. Can also be useful to convince championship sides to sell good youngsters if you can grease their palms with a few kids for a while.
If we were QPR ( if you know what I mean) I think Razak may well be able to hold a place in the team.But we have now incredibly high standards and aims. Just look at our midfield players of Nigel,Silva,Yaya,Milner,Nasri,Barry,Pizarro and AJ and you have to be something special to get in front of any of them. Let's face it some on that list get slaughtered on here when they produce anything but a world class performance.
I hope he develops well and quickly and he does get to be a regular with us.He has a good enough attitude so has a chance at least.
twosips wrote:I genuinely thought he looked good in the games he played for us, though rough round the edges. He was better than Birmingham and Wolves' midfield when he played then, and he was even younger. No reason to believe he's not better now too. I wonder if he does have a genuine chance as Yaya's understudy. I'd love it if so.
How good would it be if Rekik, Razak and Guidetti all saved us fifteen/twenty million pounds each?
ant london wrote:Just a point of realism about the Yaya who some are saying he is not.....no doubting that the Yaya Toure who played for Barcelona was an excellent, top level player but I would argue that the Yaya people are saying Razak will never become is the Yaya who has developed (or been allowed the framework to demonstrate this side of him) at City over the last couple of years.
Yaya is 28 years old and over the last 18 months now looks like the "new Vieira" the Premiership has been clamouring for since the old one passed his peak at Arsenal. I would contend that very few players who have the raw talent (strength, vision, on the ball ability, passing, stamina, goal threat) would ever blossom into the real full package until their mid-20's.
If Razak can fulfil a De Jong role to a good level in the next couple of years I would say that is a realistic goal. The next Yaya Toure at 21 is laughable...even Yaya wasn't the Yaya we all drool over at that age
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: gmercer1, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, Nick, nottsblue, Outcast, trueblue64 and 160 guests