stevefromdonny wrote:hes been seen coming out of a strip joint early friday morning at 2-45 in liverpool. but papers are again putting a bad spin on this, if the lad got to trainning at the right time on friday and didnt drink what is the problem. we are getting too hard with sports stars these days, if they play 100% in the next game there shouldnt be a prob with them. when i was young many years ago, some players would be in the pub up to a hour b4 kick off and still put a shift in.
ayrshireblue wrote:No surprise to see Neil Custis name attached to that piece of "journalism"
Ted Hughes wrote:If Mancini sees it as a problem, it's a problem. If he's not arsed, it's not a problem. It's all down to him, not us.
If Bob has strict rules & a code of conduct & Mario has broken it, then there has to be punishment & that could involve being dropped from the team. He can't make exceptions or others will take the piss & his power will be gone.
london blue 2 wrote:I love the blind protection some people give that boy on here. If he was meant to be indoors resting then he deserves all the shit he gets from the media. Dzeko will start then.
ant london wrote:london blue 2 wrote:I love the blind protection some people give that boy on here. If he was meant to be indoors resting then he deserves all the shit he gets from the media. Dzeko will start then.
he was sober in a strip club at 2am....big fucking wow
Hardly "blind protection" but really how detrimental can that conceivably be to his performance on a Saturday? Fuck me, I wouldn't even be off my stride for a 730am start at work the following day.
ant london wrote:I'd argue that rules like that are more aimed at the English lads (see case file marked Barry, Hart and St Andrews piss ups) who wouldn't have the self-discipline to not be on the beers/champagne if they were there til 2am.
David Silva out having dinner at a friend's house til 2am? Would that similarly perturb you if it contravened Mancini's rule re bedtime? No, thought not.
I can understand the need for rules certainly but if I were Mancini I would certainly use some judgement in when to apply them to the letter
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:ant london wrote:I'd argue that rules like that are more aimed at the English lads (see case file marked Barry, Hart and St Andrews piss ups) who wouldn't have the self-discipline to not be on the beers/champagne if they were there til 2am.
David Silva out having dinner at a friend's house til 2am? Would that similarly perturb you if it contravened Mancini's rule re bedtime? No, thought not.
I can understand the need for rules certainly but if I were Mancini I would certainly use some judgement in when to apply them to the letter
If he has set the rules and they have been broken it's important how he,Mancini, reacts.If he "lets Mario off" do the other players get the same leeway if/when they break rules? Didnt we find out a while ago that Mario missed some early season games for disciplinary reasons? Mancini is no soft touch so it will be interesting to see how this goes.
Wonderwall wrote:
Mancini will not let him get away with it, he will punish him in line with the crime and rightly so, but its not exactly BIG news and as someone has said, the name "Custis" and the paper it is in says it all.
I bet the owners thought all their dreams had come true when mario walked in with a fist full of dollars..... What I want to know is, WHY LIVERPOOL FFS?
Blue Since 76 wrote:Wonderwall wrote:
Mancini will not let him get away with it, he will punish him in line with the crime and rightly so, but its not exactly BIG news and as someone has said, the name "Custis" and the paper it is in says it all.
I bet the owners thought all their dreams had come true when mario walked in with a fist full of dollars..... What I want to know is, WHY LIVERPOOL FFS?
More slappers and a lot cheaper.
Never mind Mancini, what's his girlfriend going to say!
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: carl_feedthegoat, CTID Hants, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], ruralblue and 203 guests