Page 1 of 1

Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 5:14 pm
by PeterParker
Milan's reject, Madrid''s reject, scoring machine for his national team and Schalke, 67 goals in 2 years, 29 years in august.
Can he be a solution? Yay or nay?

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 5:17 pm
by chips
PeterParker wrote:Milan's reject, Madrid''s reject, scoring machine for his national team and Schalke, 67 goals in 2 years, 29 years in august.
Can he be a solution? Yay or nay?


I think he's a bit too old for what city are trying to build

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 5:42 pm
by DoomMerchant
too much horse face for us maybe?

shove a fuclin carrot in that craw please.

Image

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 5:43 pm
by DoomMerchant
DoomMerchant wrote:too much horse face for us maybe?

shove a fuclin carrot in that craw please.

Image



also, neiiiigghhhh for me.

cheers

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:06 pm
by mr_nool
Image

also, he's a cunt and i hate him.

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:42 pm
by bluebananamilksheikh
No thank you!

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 6:46 pm
by Crossie
Eat and apple through a letterbox.

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 7:37 pm
by LookMumImOnMCF.net
Seems to me like a lot of players be scoring in the Dutch League, but then become less prolific when moving abroad.

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 8:15 pm
by Goaters 103
Nope. We need far better than this and far younger too.

City dont spend to spunk big money or hand out big contracts to 29 year olds hence why any talk of Van Persie coming is pure folly.

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:20 pm
by DoomMerchant
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:Seems to me like a lot of players be scoring in the Dutch League, but then become less prolific when moving abroad.


the dutch league is like pornography, then their transition to another league is like what it's like to date them in real life.

bizarre, but understandable. They've blown their wads by the time the move. A player only has so many goals in him.

cheers

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:11 pm
by BlueinBosnia
DoomMerchant wrote:the dutch league is like pornography, then their transition to another league is like what it's like to date them in real life.

bizarre, but understandable. They've blown their wads by the time the move. A player only has so many goals in him.

Interesting that you make an analogy involving porn stars who have blown their wads...

cheers

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:11 pm
by The Original Special One
Nope

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:18 pm
by DoomMerchant
BlueinBosnia wrote:
DoomMerchant wrote:the dutch league is like pornography, then their transition to another league is like what it's like to date them in real life.

bizarre, but understandable. They've blown their wads by the time the move. A player only has so many goals in him.

Interesting that you make an analogy involving porn stars who have blown their wads...

cheers


i thought some might find that analogy incredibly insightful

cheers

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:44 pm
by Biamp
First of all, he is kind old to me. Add to that, he failed miserably in Spain and Italy, I don't think he will have any better time in PL.

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 6:47 pm
by Swales4ever
As You said he has failed miserably in the other 2 major leagues (softer than PL), I saw him play at Milan several times and never impressed very much. If most of us are puzzled about Edin, I cannot really see how he can drive us forward.

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:55 pm
by Ted Hughes
No, no, no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no.

Re: Huntelaar

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 6:39 am
by Blue Since 76
Ted Hughes wrote:No, no, no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no , no, no, no, no ,no, no, no, no, no, no ,no.


You missed the 'there's no limit' part