The mancityfans.net football forum

A mate just forwarded it to me.

http://www.debatabledecisions.com/

not had a chance to look at the fine details, but had a quick look at what they've got listed for City and they're missing loads

This is the problem when people talk about video evidence. The same people who will decide on the video evidence are the same people who will usually give dodgy decisions in favour of Utd & Liverpool.

Its a good effort, but in all honesty unless you have a team of contributors from the clubs concerned, with the final decision going to a moderator, you are going to get loads wrong.

I spotted this a few weeks ago when a mune posted it on fb as EVIDENCE that they didnt get an unfair share of the rub of the green. As usual, the mune was unable to comprehend that an info source without full grasp of the facts was as useful as a chocolate teapot.

Im_Spartacus wrote:Its a good effort, but in all honesty unless you have a team of contributors from the clubs concerned, with the final decision going to a moderator, you are going to get loads wrong.

I spotted this a few weeks ago when a mune posted it on fb as EVIDENCE that they didnt get an unfair share of the rub of the green. As usual, the mune was unable to comprehend that an info source without full grasp of the facts was as useful as a chocolate teapot.

Agree. There should also be some kind of independently-created 'weighting' system, taking into account the impact of the decision on the game, the game upon the team's league standing/cup progression, and the severity of the incident/punishment.

All-in-all, if this were done properly, it would cost tens of thousands of pounds in man hours each season.

Ted Hughes wrote:This is the problem when people talk about video evidence. The same people who will decide on the video evidence are the same people who will usually give dodgy decisions in favour of Utd & Liverpool.

thats right ted, until a wigan fan e mailed goals on sunday telling chris kamara about ivanovich,es punch on the wigan player it had not been highlighted but they did and since then he will get a ban, its the people controlling the cameras who decide.

i haven't clicked on the link, but honestly....

"what a fucking bunch of bitters" springs to mind.

Let's give it up and focus on the goddam results of the actual football? Had we grabbed the world by the plums and fucking scorched it we wouldn't be sitting around like children complaining that the big kids stole our toys.

cheers

DoomMerchant wrote:i haven't clicked on the link, but honestly....

"what a fucking bunch of bitters" springs to mind.

Let's give it up and focus on the goddam results of the actual football? Had we grabbed the world by the plums and fucking scorched it we wouldn't be sitting around like children complaining that the big kids stole our toys.

cheers

I think the concept is good mate, it is not a whinge by any one group of self interest fans. It is more highlighting just how the league is skewed by strange, bizarre out outright cheating by referees. Although curiously their results suggest that Stoke are the biggest beneficiaries of the referees incompetency, whilst the bigger clubs are at a net loss and get less in their favour.

If things haven´t evenrd themselves out a bit this time next year I´ll KNOW it´s fuclin bent ;)


See ya!