The mancityfans.net football forum

has he been asked the question then?

has sir cunt?

halsey?

anyone?

or are we all wrong?

we'll need 100 points next season

Taggart was asked about it. It was a penalty, young made a meal of it but it was a penalty. END OF DISCUSSION SO SAYS LORD CUNTHOLE and so it will be stricken from the annuls of premier league history.

Taggart was asked about it. It was a penalty, young made a meal of it but it was a penalty. END OF DISCUSSION SO SAYS LORD CUNTHOLE and so it will be stricken from the annuls of premier league history.

I'd happily brain the cheating cunt on a springboard, chances of both being together are probably slim but heyho

are you implying that young is gay and has aids?

Nigels Tackle wrote:are you implying that young is gay and has aids?

Aids wouldn't get near the cunt, he would still get a penalty though.

Nigels Tackle wrote:are you implying that young is gay and has aids?

no but if he was and did have I wouldnt lose sleep over it :)

Nigels Tackle wrote:are you implying that young is gay and has aids?

Funny how people think, I only thought of the yank diver but there you go

Was wondering about both the fuck faces dives in the last two games...if a player is adjudged to have comitted an act that has clearly brought the game into disrepute why can't retrospective action be taken against him. I understand the ref saw the incident but can't a counter appeal be made by the affected club? I think I need to find that 'clutching at straws' picture again :-)

trout man wrote:Was wondering about both the fuck faces dives in the last two games...if a player is adjudged to have comitted an act that has clearly brought the game into disrepute why can't retrospective action be taken against him. I understand the ref saw the incident but can't a counter appeal be made by the affected club? I think I need to find that 'clutching at straws' picture again :-)

The one against QPR clearly wasn't a dive, otherwise Derry's red card would have been rescinded. There's no one to even appeal the one from yesterday.

Hopefully, at 0-0 in the 92nd minute at Sunderland, Young will burst into the box and be scythed down by a Sunderland defender. Absolute, nailed on penalty. And hopefully, the ref will look at it and think I'm not being fooled by him and not give it. That will be the only justice to the last two decisions.

Blue Since 76 wrote:

trout man wrote:Was wondering about both the fuck faces dives in the last two games...if a player is adjudged to have comitted an act that has clearly brought the game into disrepute why can't retrospective action be taken against him. I understand the ref saw the incident but can't a counter appeal be made by the affected club? I think I need to find that 'clutching at straws' picture again :-)

The one against QPR clearly wasn't a dive, otherwise Derry's red card would have been rescinded. There's no one to even appeal the one from yesterday.

Hopefully, at 0-0 in the 92nd minute at Sunderland, Young will burst into the box and be scythed down by a Sunderland defender. Absolute, nailed on penalty. And hopefully, the ref will look at it and think I'm not being fooled by him and not give it. That will be the only justice to the last two decisions.

It will happen eventually but it will NOT even itself out

As Iv said before, could someone put together a youtube vid of all the clips where they have had it going their way and cheated?? Maybe a page could be started on here where everyone posts clips that they recall happening throughout the season. Im not sure how to make such vids but I think it would be something good to show everyone at the end of the season if they win it. Or even if they dont, it would be good to show everyone how much help they got and still couldnt do it.

Blue Since 76 wrote:

trout man wrote:Was wondering about both the fuck faces dives in the last two games...if a player is adjudged to have comitted an act that has clearly brought the game into disrepute why can't retrospective action be taken against him. I understand the ref saw the incident but can't a counter appeal be made by the affected club? I think I need to find that 'clutching at straws' picture again :-)

The one against QPR clearly wasn't a dive, otherwise Derry's red card would have been rescinded. There's no one to even appeal the one from yesterday.

Hopefully, at 0-0 in the 92nd minute at Sunderland, Young will burst into the box and be scythed down by a Sunderland defender. Absolute, nailed on penalty. And hopefully, the ref will look at it and think I'm not being fooled by him and not give it. That will be the only justice to the last two decisions.

*Mental picture* - There's a coming together of legs "a la Cuntenberg" impression *wringing of hands* and lo and behold both of Youngs legs end up broken and resembling said fingers...........now there's justice.

And for any do-gooders who think I wouldn't really want that to happen my conscience is clear...fuck him the cheating, diving twunt

ashton287 wrote:Taggart was asked about it. It was a penalty, young made a meal of it but it was a penalty. END OF DISCUSSION SO SAYS LORD CUNTHOLE and so it will be stricken from the annuls of premier league history.

Shocking thing was Sky's commentators/guests (yorke and Wilkins FFS - right up baconface's arse) and MOTD pundits (Dixon and some self-confessed scum fan) stated that there was contact so therefore it was a penalty - so the the crime was exaggeration rather than cheating!!!

What utter bollocks and this will become the media party line over the coming weeks

McLeish said before the game that he was going to tell his players to avoid going in to reduce the risk of another 'penalty incident like QPR' - too little mate - you needed to also tell them to leave 5 yards of space - because the only reason there was contact was because young went for the player with his foot to make sure there was


Utter fucking cheat

I guess that baconface will tell his squad to reduce this sort of stuff because it is getting to obvious - probably means only 1 hour spent practising rather than 2

mcfc1632 wrote:

ashton287 wrote:Taggart was asked about it. It was a penalty, young made a meal of it but it was a penalty. END OF DISCUSSION SO SAYS LORD CUNTHOLE and so it will be stricken from the annuls of premier league history.

Shocking thing was Sky's commentators/guests (yorke and Wilkins FFS - right up baconface's arse) and MOTD pundits (Dixon and some self-confessed scum fan) stated that there was contact so therefore it was a penalty - so the the crime was exaggeration rather than cheating!!!

What utter bollocks and this will become the media party line over the coming weeks

McLeish said before the game that he was going to tell his players to avoid going in to reduce the risk of another 'penalty incident like QPR' - too little mate - you needed to also tell them to leave 5 yards of space - because the only reason there was contact was because young went for the player with his foot to make sure there was


Utter fucking cheat

I guess that baconface will tell his squad to reduce this sort of stuff because it is getting to obvious - probably means only 1 hour spent practising rather than 2

Dixon is an embarressment of a so called City fan. Fooking prick needs to grow a pair. Granted,he will prob be jobless next season if he done so, but would you go against your club for any sort of money?? I fooking wouldnt.

Bianchi on Ice wrote:has he been asked the question then?

has sir cunt?

halsey?

anyone?

or are we all wrong?

we'll need 100 points next season

At least a 100. Also....the nickname is priceless !

What it has proved without a shadow of doubt is Refs will crumble, Danny Murphy gets tripped from behind it is win some lose some ref waives play on. Scum manage the games the ref blows his whistle for them when required.Kompany off Rooney managed the game for a few seconds ref does as he is told, same with the pens...........

I keep reading and hearing that there was "contact". This word contact, what does it actually mean, because last time i checked, the rules were pretty clear that if you are fouled in the area, you will receive a penalty. I am not aware of a rule whereby a penalty is given for contact, or we would get one every single time a corner is taken.

If a player is impeded by a shirt tug running to head a ball coming in from a corner, that is contact, why is it not a penalty? Is the shirt tug, which is clear, blatent contact, any less of an offence than the merest of touches followed by a swan dive feigning that the contact was akin to a machine gun volley?

I would like to add my own conspiracy theory after this last few weeks. Penalties can quite clearly be given or not given on a whim, and the officials seem to have no hesitation in giving penalties for the merest touch to the top sides. Its a sort of helping hand if you will, a leg up to the champions league. Yet smaller clubs are fucked, because they by their very nature spend very little time in the area of a top side, so the referee will hardly ever need to worry about giving them a penalty - and if they have the temerity to be in the big clubs box, the referee can ignore the penalty claim, nobody will ever notice.

Its a very very easy way over the course of a season, with the odd decision here or there from a contentious dive/contact for just one or two referees to be able to cause a decisive swing every single season. From a rule that doesnt actually exist, that they have made up all by themselves.

And on that note, with manchester united being the best supported club in the world, how many referees are banned from refereeing them in the elite group? You would have though that of 20 or 30 officials, at least a handful would support the worlds best supported club, but alas none appear to. Why do you think that would be?

I always though footy was a contact sport

Im_Spartacus wrote:I keep reading and hearing that there was "contact". This word contact, what does it actually mean, because last time i checked, the rules were pretty clear that if you are fouled in the area, you will receive a penalty. I am not aware of a rule whereby a penalty is given for contact, or we would get one every single time a corner is taken.

If a player is impeded by a shirt tug running to head a ball coming in from a corner, that is contact, why is it not a penalty? Is the shirt tug, which is clear, blatent contact, any less of an offence than the merest of touches followed by a swan dive feigning that the contact was akin to a machine gun volley?

I would like to add my own conspiracy theory after this last few weeks. Penalties can quite clearly be given or not given on a whim, and the officials seem to have no hesitation in giving penalties for the merest touch to the top sides. Its a sort of helping hand if you will, a leg up to the champions league. Yet smaller clubs are fucked, because they by their very nature spend very little time in the area of a top side, so the referee will hardly ever need to worry about giving them a penalty - and if they have the temerity to be in the big clubs box, the referee can ignore the penalty claim, nobody will ever notice.

Its a very very easy way over the course of a season, with the odd decision here or there from a contentious dive/contact for just one or two referees to be able to cause a decisive swing every single season. From a rule that doesnt actually exist, that they have made up all by themselves.

And on that note, with manchester united being the best supported club in the world, how many referees are banned from refereeing them in the elite group? You would have though that of 20 or 30 officials, at least a handful would support the worlds best supported club, but alas none appear to. Why do you think that would be?

Well written. How does one define contact? Jersey pulling outside the 18 goes unpunished, but inside, will bring a penalty. If not for the pulling itself, but for the dive that will be taken. We need referees to let the game play and allow for players to be physical. However, when a ref does this, he then plays into the hands of the cheater (Diver) I think. Although Tevez was fouled and didnt deserve a yellow, I hope the refs next year come right out and continue the Diving Witch hunt. There is no other way to stop it. If its a conspiracy to keep the top players healthy and making great plays....its only going to backfire. Take Ronaldo....he isnt mentioned in the Pele/Maradonna conversation for the best ever because he is a former rag scum holy diving mutha fu**er . Now if United has a bakers dozen or so of Refs in their pockets...then there isnt much we can do about that. We just need to play quality respectable football, Cream will rise to the top.