Page 1 of 1
Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:35 pmby Rag_hater
Personally I hope there is some substance in Chinners Bollox story(although that sounds bad) about Luiz and we would get him of the chance arose.Think he has been one of Chelskis better players this year,and getting a defender seems to be top of the list for me he ticks the boxes.
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Mon Jun 04, 2012 4:48 pmby Kiss_The_Goat
Luiz is an absolutely awful defender! He may be technically good on the ball and make some great direct penetrating runs, but as a defender he is a total liability... he gets himself constantly out of position, gives away stupid free kicks and penalties and dives in to stupid challenges when there's no need. He isn't a defender imo - he's probably better suited to being a DM, where his constant mistakes won't cost goals.
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Mon Jun 04, 2012 4:58 pmby DoomMerchant
Rag_hater wrote:Personally I hope there is some substance in Chinners Bollox story(although that sounds bad) about Luiz and we would get him of the chance arose.Think he has been one of Chelskis better players this year,and getting a defender seems to be top of the list for me he ticks the boxes.
now yr just trying to showboat, and to be honest it's YOU that's dropped a bollock.
Less JK Rowling and more Sir Arthur Conan Doyle please.
cheers
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:45 pmby craigmcfc
Kiss_The_Goat wrote:Luiz is an absolutely awful defender! He may be technically good on the ball and make some great direct penetrating runs, but as a defender he is a total liability... he gets himself constantly out of position, gives away stupid free kicks and penalties and dives in to stupid challenges when there's no need. He isn't a defender imo - he's probably better suited to being a DM, where his constant mistakes won't cost goals.
I'm in complete agreement with this reply. Dreadful defender with no redeeming features.
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:50 pmby Mase
I'd rather have Savic!
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:55 pmby Rag_hater
Think he went through a bad spell for a few months but is now back to being good again.
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:08 pmby Rae4685
I have said for awhile I think he will come good, technically good player just needs some positional guidance and would get that at city
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Mon Jun 04, 2012 7:43 pmby Colin the King
Chelsea would want in excess of £20million, it's just too much of an outlay on a player who could still go either way. In Lescott and Kompany, we have an assured, solid (and title winning!) backline for the next 5 years. What we need to supplement that is one or two dependable, experienced guys who can do a job during injuries/suspensions, and then one or two academy prospects/cheap imports to try and mould into starters for the next era.
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Mon Jun 04, 2012 7:57 pmby DoomMerchant
Colin the King wrote:Chelsea would want in excess of £20million, it's just too much of an outlay on a player who could still go either way. In Lescott and Kompany, we have an assured, solid (and title winning!) backline for the next 5 years. What we need to supplement that is one or two dependable, experienced guys who can do a job during injuries/suspensions, and then one or two academy prospects/cheap imports to try and mould into starters for the next era.
it's not a serious question...it's a fishing expedition of Babe Winkelman-like proportions.
cheers
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:09 pmby PeterParker
I really don't rate at all this Michael Bolton look-a-like. I think he said something about us, the past year, that was way off.
I see him in the same group as Tranny1, Tranny 2, Pepe and Coentrao. Expert on cheating. Fuck him.
I rather have Frank Sinclair.
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:31 pmby chips
I'd rather bloody have savic!
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:33 pmby Wooders
we need a a gert, useless brazilian in this team with the nickname "sideshow" - it's been too long - sign 'im up !
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:29 amby JonnySG
Kiss_The_Goat wrote:Luiz is an absolutely awful defender! He may be technically good on the ball and make some great direct penetrating runs, but as a defender he is a total liability... he gets himself constantly out of position, gives away stupid free kicks and penalties and dives in to stupid challenges when there's no need. [highlight]He isn't a defender imo - he's probably better suited to being a DM, where his constant mistakes won't cost goals[/highlight].
i really agree with this,always felt this way
Re: Deal or no Deal
Posted:
Tue Jun 05, 2012 4:13 pmby Niall Quinns Discopants
Mase wrote:I'd rather have Savic!
Behave.