Page 1 of 2
cahill

Posted:
Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:32 pm
by Nigels Tackle
of to the mls... ny red bulls.
didn't see that one coming...
Re: cahill

Posted:
Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:42 pm
by Pretty Boy Lee
Nigels Tackle wrote:of to the mls... ny red bulls.
didn't see that one coming...
Tim Cahill? If so brilliant, less I have to hear about him over here and one less header a season we shall concede.
Re: cahill

Posted:
Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:09 pm
by bobby brows
good player, one of the great all time signings for a premier league club! So glad to see the back off him!
Re: cahill

Posted:
Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:20 pm
by DoomMerchant
Nigels Tackle wrote:of to the mls... ny red bulls.
didn't see that one coming...
Good for him. He will do well there. MLS is on the brink of not completely sucking donkey balls. #crazy
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:49 am
by halnone
I follow New York quite a bit tbh.
I'm curious to see how he'll do there.
Most of his goals come from headers and New York have only 2 players that can actually put a decent ball in (Lade and Henry). He has enough quality though to bag quite a few goals in MLS though.
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 1:46 am
by DoomMerchant
halnone wrote:I follow New York quite a bit tbh.
I'm curious to see how he'll do there.
Most of his goals come from headers and New York have only 2 players that can actually put a decent ball in (Lade and Henry). He has enough quality though to bag quite a few goals in MLS though.
It's not just me thinking it sucks less this season is it? I've only watched about 5 matches but I've been surprised. What do you think?
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:27 am
by PALUS
So that USA leugue who is the best i really dont follow i know just for the club that David go Los Angeles somthing, witch club is best , and when they finish the season , do they have some like other level like in Europe CL or in South America Coppa Libertadores even Asia have but i dont know how they call it and ,is Canadian play toghether with them in same leugue.
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:48 am
by halnone
DoomMerchant wrote:halnone wrote:I follow New York quite a bit tbh.
I'm curious to see how he'll do there.
Most of his goals come from headers and New York have only 2 players that can actually put a decent ball in (Lade and Henry). He has enough quality though to bag quite a few goals in MLS though.
It's not just me thinking it sucks less this season is it? I've only watched about 5 matches but I've been surprised. What do you think?
It's definitely getting better each year.
I only started following MLS in 2008 but since then the quality has increased substantially. Still nowhere near the prem but it's becoming far more enjoyable to watch.
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:13 am
by Wonderwall
Cahill is going to be a massive miss for everton. Probably one of their best players down the years and a steal of a buy from millwall. One of those players I wish we had signed.
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:58 am
by BobbyDazzler
He was fantastic, but its probably the right move for them to get him off the wage bill now. He only scored twice last season in thirty odd games and is now in his thirties. Moyes is probably grateful to get a fee and free up room for someone else. definitely would have loved him at our place a few years ago tho.
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:04 am
by Esky
Disappointed to see him leave the Premiership at 32. One of the best signings of the past 10 years at 3 million. Still doing well for our national team too.
Still, after 8 years living in Greater Manchester, New York's probably not a bad place to finish up.
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:33 am
by There's only 1 city!!
thank fook for that as he always scored past us!!!
well, it seemed that way anyway!!
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:46 am
by littlebig
Wonderwall wrote:Cahill is going to be a massive miss for everton. Probably one of their best players down the years and a steal of a buy from millwall. One of those players I wish we had signed.
He was top notch allright, the team seemed to do well when he played well. A bit shite last season though, good time for gollum to let him go
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:13 am
by twosips
They don't need him as much now they have Jelavic. Probs why they're letting him go. Finally found a striker worth something.
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:42 am
by Hazy2
Thats 6 points then good riddance twat.
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:12 am
by Ted Hughes
twosips wrote:They don't need him as much now they have Jelavic. Probs why they're letting him go. Finally found a striker worth something.
They need him.
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:57 pm
by bluelogic32
halnone wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:halnone wrote:I follow New York quite a bit tbh.
I'm curious to see how he'll do there.
Most of his goals come from headers and New York have only 2 players that can actually put a decent ball in (Lade and Henry). He has enough quality though to bag quite a few goals in MLS though.
It's not just me thinking it sucks less this season is it? I've only watched about 5 matches but I've been surprised. What do you think?
It's definitely getting better each year.
I only started following MLS in 2008 but since then the quality has increased substantially. Still nowhere near the prem but it's becoming far more enjoyable to watch.
It is getting better you guys are right. I live near(ish) to toronto so I support TFC, watch the odd game on TV and i've gone to 3 games so far this season, all within the past month (the first part of the season was absolutely dreadful). I've been lucky enough to witness 1 - 1 against NY, 3 - 2 against vancouver (amazing game to be at) and 2 - 1 against colorado, which were all good games to watch. TFC with their new manager, and the rest of the MLS, is indeed improving. Cahills signing is a good one for the whole league, these players help not only fill their stadiums, but other teams as well. The NY game, cause of henry, and vancouver game, because they are our rivals, were pushing capacity. While the Colorado game was around 18,000.
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:29 pm
by Alex Sapphire
bluelogic32 wrote:halnone wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:halnone wrote:I follow New York quite a bit tbh.
I'm curious to see how he'll do there.
Most of his goals come from headers and New York have only 2 players that can actually put a decent ball in (Lade and Henry). He has enough quality though to bag quite a few goals in MLS though.
It's not just me thinking it sucks less this season is it? I've only watched about 5 matches but I've been surprised. What do you think?
It's definitely getting better each year.
I only started following MLS in 2008 but since then the quality has increased substantially. Still nowhere near the prem but it's becoming far more enjoyable to watch.
It is getting better you guys are right. I live near(ish) to toronto so I support TFC, watch the odd game on TV and i've gone to 3 games so far this season, all within the past month (the first part of the season was absolutely dreadful). I've been lucky enough to witness 1 - 1 against NY, 3 - 2 against vancouver (amazing game to be at) and 2 - 1 against colorado, which were all good games to watch. TFC with their new manager, and the rest of the MLS, is indeed improving. Cahills signing is a good one for the whole league, these players help not only fill their stadiums, but other teams as well. The NY game, cause of henry, and vancouver game, because they are our rivals, were pushing capacity. While the Colorado game was around 18,000.
Can we have this thread wrapped up and sent (Royal Mail) to North America free of customs charges?
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:41 pm
by Ted Hughes
Can I just add, I watched a US game on the PC recently, due to being stuck indoors in the middle of a fucking storm from hell, & it sucked.
Ta.
Re: cahill

Posted:
Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:41 pm
by carolina-blue
He will probably still score against us from there , he was a great buy and one of those players I have a hated respect for .