The mancityfans.net football forum

What do we reckon then?

yr almost worth banning.

almost.

i think others would agree that your previous incarnations were more thoughtful, biting, just plain...interesting.

cheers

DoomMerchant wrote:yr almost worth banning.

almost.

i think others would agree that your previous incarnations were more thoughtful, biting, just plain...interesting.

cheers

What's your problem, its in the papers

Telegraph

DoomMerchant wrote:yr almost worth banning.

almost.

i think others would agree that your previous incarnations were more thoughtful, biting, just plain...interesting.

cheers

You should be banned. we are 3 days before a deadline and Walcott rejects a contract and you don't him we should consider taking him over Sinclair. We've already had a Sinclair he was shite, I don't fancy another. Anyhow I've reported you.

See Sinclair thread.Even if it doesn t happen how freaky.

Antti won't be pleased.
viewtopic.php?f=119&t=43833&start=66

Moses wrote:

DoomMerchant wrote:yr almost worth banning.

almost.

i think others would agree that your previous incarnations were more thoughtful, biting, just plain...interesting.

cheers

You should be banned. we are 3 days before a deadline and Walcott rejects a contract and you don't him we should consider taking him over Sinclair. We've already had a Sinclair he was shite, I don't fancy another. Anyhow I've reported you.

That will be the most insignificant thing he's ever been reported to anyone for.

Deffo the best useless non tackling winger.Bert will get him tackling,lol

Yeah, ban Doomie. He wasen't as funny as usual today.

On the other hand. Bring them all, Nani, Walcott, Nastasic, Sinclair. Bobby will be pleased.

Ted Hughes wrote:
That will be the most insignificant thing he's ever been reported to anyone for.

Significant action will be taken as a result of this report.

PeterParker wrote:Yeah, ban Doomie. He wasen't as funny as usual today.

On the other hand. Bring them all, Nani, Walcott, Nastasic, Sinclair. Bobby will be pleased.

Thanks for the support Peter.

Moses wrote:

PeterParker wrote:Yeah, ban Doomie. He wasen't as funny as usual today.

On the other hand. Bring them all, Nani, Walcott, Nastasic, Sinclair. Bobby will be pleased.

Thanks for the support Peter.

Epic.

You never know this one could have legs.When all else fails we can always return to our feeder club.

Moses wrote:

DoomMerchant wrote:yr almost worth banning.

almost.

i think others would agree that your previous incarnations were more thoughtful, biting, just plain...interesting.

cheers

You should be banned. we are 3 days before a deadline and Walcott rejects a contract and you don't him we should consider taking him over Sinclair. We've already had a Sinclair he was shite, I don't fancy another. Anyhow I've reported you.

i rescind my comment...that made me fuclin laff you doucher.

cheers

This seems appropriate now although it's old.

Moses wrote:

Ted Hughes wrote:
That will be the most insignificant thing he's ever been reported to anyone for.

Significant action will be taken as a result of this report.

Can we see what's in it ?

Ted Hughes wrote:
Can we see what's in it ?

Merchants a Gooner, we are swapping him for Walcott.

Bit of late night scouting.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... aches.html

chips wrote:This seems appropriate now although it's old.

triffic! AAA+
[S&P/Fitch]