The mancityfans.net football forum

http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague ... index.html

No Kolo?

But John Guidetti is in!!!!

Nastasic and Maicon in means no room for kolo but why is Guidetti showing as not being a youth player?

Plus only 24 A team players selected

I guess we can't have more than 24 on the A List, because we only have 3 club-trained players (Johansen, Richards, Guidetti) on it, so we lose a place.

Wonderwall wrote:Nastasic and Maicon in means no room for kolo but why is Guidetti showing as not being a youth player?

Found this:

In order to be eligible for List B for next season, a player must be born on Jan 1st 1991 or later and he must have already spent at least two full continuous seasons at the club. Loan spells at other clubs can also sometimes cause a player to not fulfill the second requirement, even though he arrived at the club more than two years ago.

I presume that's Kolo gone then.Is the Turkish transfer window still open?

Green & Blue wrote:I presume that's Kolo gone then.Is the Turkish transfer window still open?

I think it is. Remember the deadline being Sep 5th.

Razak is missing as well.

Hasnt kolo said he is staying?

No razak or Suarez

no richard wright either!

I'm surprised about Razak being left out after his match winning display v QPR

Interesting to see Courtney Meppen-Walters in the named squad. If it is as nailed on as it seems then he will looking at 4 prison walls for a long time

Chinners wrote:I'm surprised about Razak being left out after his match winning display v QPR

not eligible for the b squad, and no room for him, rekik, or suarez on the a list. and who of the 21 non-club trained guys would you leave off the list for kolo? i can't come up with one personally.

BmoreBlue wrote:

Chinners wrote:I'm surprised about Razak being left out after his match winning display v QPR

not eligible for the b squad, and no room for him, rekik, or suarez on the a list. and who of the 21 non-club trained guys would you leave off the list for kolo? i can't come up with one personally.

think that was a wee bit of sarcasm from our friend, mr. chinners.

Chinners wrote:I'm surprised about Razak being left out after his match winning display v QPR

Excellent.

something tells me I am not going to hear the end of that razak thing

cunts the lot of yer

BmoreBlue wrote:

Chinners wrote:I'm surprised about Razak being left out after his match winning display v QPR

not eligible for the b squad, and no room for him, rekik, or suarez on the a list. and who of the 21 non-club trained guys would you leave off the list for kolo? i can't come up with one personally.

Yeah, thanks for reminding the rules BmB, I too was wandering of the same, genuinely free of my Raving Loony Mate's sarcasm.

Think it's about fair to consider that giving the group we have been "gifted", there will be absolutely no room for experiments in that. maybe those two very promising Lads might find a little room in the next selection ahead the knock-out stages. Hopefully they will have shone in some CC fixture by then.

side note: as I clicked on the link provided by Tokio, I had been soon amazed at noting how the Twatini Propaganda Agents painted us with the typical home page headline "City splash out on five signings" that becomes "City strengthen with quintet of signings" in the relevant article.
those wankers are as much pathetic as desperate.

This is one of the reasons Nige was allowed to go imo.

Ted Hughes wrote:This is one of the reasons Nige was allowed to go imo.

razak?

Agreed.

Wooders wrote:

Ted Hughes wrote:This is one of the reasons Nige was allowed to go imo.

razak?

Agreed.

ha...nice. i like your tenacity kid. And yr not wrong long term either.

cheers