Ted Hughes wrote:I was referring to this on another thread. Imo we are doing one or two things differently as a team, not just in the formations & I'm wondering if it's because of his input. Either way, Mancini has to decide whether to go back to basics or whether to continue down the same path until we (hopefully) get it right.
I don't see what difference it makes whethr he can speak English or not. He can just tell Mancini what he thinks we should do & Mancini can take the session.
Ted Hughes wrote:I was referring to this on another thread. Imo we are doing one or two things differently as a team, not just in the formations & I'm wondering if it's because of his input. Either way, Mancini has to decide whether to go back to basics or whether to continue down the same path until we (hopefully) get it right.
I don't see what difference it makes whethr he can speak English or not. He can just tell Mancini what he thinks we should do & Mancini can take the session.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:As far as I am aware this is complete garbage.This new fella has been around the training sessions but doesn't take any of them whether defensive or not.As Ted suggests he might have some input (into something) but all he would do is make suggestions to Mancini and leave the boss to run the sessions.I have only ever seen Mancini take the training sessions which involve any kind of tactics.
Anyone know where this urban myth started? If it's in the media then shame on you for even half believing it.If it's some plonker on BMoon throwing it out as a possibility then even more shame on anyone for believing it. (although no surprise as it would be a massive growing thread on BMoon.)
Nigels Tackle wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:As far as I am aware this is complete garbage.This new fella has been around the training sessions but doesn't take any of them whether defensive or not.As Ted suggests he might have some input (into something) but all he would do is make suggestions to Mancini and leave the boss to run the sessions.I have only ever seen Mancini take the training sessions which involve any kind of tactics.
Anyone know where this urban myth started? If it's in the media then shame on you for even half believing it.If it's some plonker on BMoon throwing it out as a possibility then even more shame on anyone for believing it. (although no surprise as it would be a massive growing thread on BMoon.)
there was an article in yesterday's times (can't link due to times being subs only) that was inferring that our defensive issues were in part down to his appointment...
Ted Hughes wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:As far as I am aware this is complete garbage.This new fella has been around the training sessions but doesn't take any of them whether defensive or not.As Ted suggests he might have some input (into something) but all he would do is make suggestions to Mancini and leave the boss to run the sessions.I have only ever seen Mancini take the training sessions which involve any kind of tactics.
Anyone know where this urban myth started? If it's in the media then shame on you for even half believing it.If it's some plonker on BMoon throwing it out as a possibility then even more shame on anyone for believing it. (although no surprise as it would be a massive growing thread on BMoon.)
there was an article in yesterday's times (can't link due to times being subs only) that was inferring that our defensive issues were in part down to his appointment...
As if they would know what his input is.
Whatever he does, it's what Mancini wants.
Nigels Tackle wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:As far as I am aware this is complete garbage.This new fella has been around the training sessions but doesn't take any of them whether defensive or not.As Ted suggests he might have some input (into something) but all he would do is make suggestions to Mancini and leave the boss to run the sessions.I have only ever seen Mancini take the training sessions which involve any kind of tactics.
Anyone know where this urban myth started? If it's in the media then shame on you for even half believing it.If it's some plonker on BMoon throwing it out as a possibility then even more shame on anyone for believing it. (although no surprise as it would be a massive growing thread on BMoon.)
there was an article in yesterday's times (can't link due to times being subs only) that was inferring that our defensive issues were in part down to his appointment...
As if they would know what his input is.
Whatever he does, it's what Mancini wants.
that's why i was asking our man [highlight]on the ground[/highlight]...
Ted Hughes wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:As far as I am aware this is complete garbage.This new fella has been around the training sessions but doesn't take any of them whether defensive or not.As Ted suggests he might have some input (into something) but all he would do is make suggestions to Mancini and leave the boss to run the sessions.I have only ever seen Mancini take the training sessions which involve any kind of tactics.
Anyone know where this urban myth started? If it's in the media then shame on you for even half believing it.If it's some plonker on BMoon throwing it out as a possibility then even more shame on anyone for believing it. (although no surprise as it would be a massive growing thread on BMoon.)
there was an article in yesterday's times (can't link due to times being subs only) that was inferring that our defensive issues were in part down to his appointment...
As if they would know what his input is.
Whatever he does, it's what Mancini wants.
that's why i was asking our man [highlight]on the ground[/highlight]...
Don't you mean up the steps ?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Im_Spartacus, john@staustell, salford city and 105 guests