Page 1 of 2
Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:00 pm
by IanWright
Didn't know which thread to put this in, and didn't want to create a new one, but here goes nothing...
Is it true that this c*nt scored more goals for youse lot than he did any other EPL club?
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:20 pm
by Crossie
Wikipedia it yourself.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:34 pm
by Alioune DVToure
IanWright wrote:Didn't know which thread to put this in, and didn't want to create a new one, but here goes nothing...
Is it true that this c*nt scored more goals for youse lot than he did any other EPL club?
Sounds about right. I reckon he bagged about 50-odd. He was out on the wing a lot at Chelsea.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:34 pm
by Alex Sapphire
no it's not
no wonder they charge you so much for your season tickets.High maintenance
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:51 pm
by sandman
Youse is not a word, and could you please tell all the other imbeciles in London that the word ask is not pronounced arks.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:54 pm
by WiganBlue
37 for us and 37 for Chelsea
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:05 pm
by zuricity
sandman wrote:Youse is not a word, and could you please tell all the other imbeciles in London that the word ask is not pronounced arks.
Well spotted and well done Sandman. It's even worse in New York where those from the Bronx say 'Axe' instead of 'ask'.
God knows how any tourist understands directions when asking for them in United's home town.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:30 pm
by Beefymcfc
Give the guy a break fella's, he seems a good bloke.
As for Anelka, I couldn't believe that we signed him (Arsenal, Real, PSG)and even more that he did well, what was his motivation? Equally as gobsmacked when he left, for fucking Turkey! I was upset.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:41 pm
by Green & Blue
Beefymcfc wrote:Give the guy a break fella's, he seems a good bloke.
As for Anelka, I couldn't believe that we signed him (Arsenal, Real, PSG)and even more that he did well, what was his motivation? Equally as gobsmacked when he left, for fucking Turkey! I was upset.
Even more of a surprise when he ended up at Bolton.He was on top form in his early to mid twentys when we had him.Would have loved him to have stayed at the club longer.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Thu Oct 18, 2012 10:39 pm
by Beefymcfc
Green & Blue wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Give the guy a break fella's, he seems a good bloke.
As for Anelka, I couldn't believe that we signed him (Arsenal, Real, PSG)and even more that he did well, what was his motivation? Equally as gobsmacked when he left, for fucking Turkey! I was upset.
Even more of a surprise when he ended up at Bolton.He was on top form in his early to mid twentys when we had him.Would have loved him to have stayed at the club longer.
That's been erased.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:22 am
by Original Dub
Dunno what the problem is with this thread lads but the op is a good poster.
No need for the shit imo.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:36 am
by Alex Sapphire
WiganBlue wrote:37 for us and 37 for Chelsea
that's league goals isn't it. Hescored moregoals for Chelsea all told.
He was the master of fluffing the one on one though wasn't he
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:26 am
by Slim
On another point, would you trade Anelka for Carlos, Dzeko or Aguero even if we had a magic rewind button and could make him the same age? Not a chance.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:35 am
by Rag_hater
Alex Sapphire wrote:WiganBlue wrote:37 for us and 37 for Chelsea
that's league goals isn't it. Hescored moregoals for Chelsea all told.
He was the master of fluffing the one on one though wasn't he
If I remember right he fucked up chavski season where they would have been unbeaten.
Good lad.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Fri Oct 19, 2012 10:04 am
by SmallTimeCharlie
Slim wrote:On another point, would you trade Anelka for Carlos, Dzeko or Aguero even if we had a magic rewind button and could make him the same age? Not a chance.
Dzeko a maybe but I notice you missed out Balotelli and he is still one of our (allegedly) four strikers. Think most would swap in a heartbeat.
From the other thread, and my own eyes, it seems this has to be Balotelli's breakout season, or he should be on his way.
Maybe Manc's saving him for the second half?
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Fri Oct 19, 2012 10:44 am
by Avalon
zuricity wrote:sandman wrote:Youse is not a word, and could you please tell all the other imbeciles in London that the word ask is not pronounced arks.
Well spotted and well done Sandman. It's even worse in New York where those from the Bronx say 'Axe' instead of 'ask'.
God knows how any tourist understands directions when asking for them in United's home town.
You spell it as axe? I always am under the impression they see aks, instead of ask.
Anyway, why so hostile to a new member? We might not like Arsenal (understatement), but at least he's being honest about it, as opposed to pretend to like City.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Fri Oct 19, 2012 10:59 am
by Chinners
I probably consider Anelka even now over Dzeko and Ballotelli
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:34 pm
by london blue 2
He's not a new member, he's actually quite a respected member.
A 22 year old Anelka would get in over Balo and Dzeko for me.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:47 pm
by Biamp
Chinners wrote:I probably consider Anelka even now over Dzeko and Ballotelli
Well said, totally agree.
Re: Nicolas Anelka

Posted:
Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:58 pm
by dazby
Anelka was outstanding for us. I loved watching him play. It disappointed me that the rest of our side at the time wasn't good enough for him.
And yes, I'd have the Anelka we had in our team now.