Page 1 of 4

Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:50 pm
by freshie
The papers are full of stories linking us with a £50m January bid for the dirty, cheating rat-faced bastard. Really hope that it's bollox

From the Telegraph

Manchester City prepare January bid for Liverpool's Luis Suarez
Manchester City manager Roberto Mancini is planning to launch an audacious January transfer bid for Liverpool striker Luis Suárez.
Liverpool are confident that Luis Suarez will stay at Anfield despite a likely bid from Manchester City

The Merseyside club will fiercely resist any attempt to lure their star player from Anfield, but Mancini has made the South American his No 1 target after being rebuffed in attempts to lure Atlético Madrid’s Falcao to the Etihad Stadium.

Falcao is instead likely to move to Chelsea and Mancini, with his new management structure in place, wants the club to show their intent by attempting to prise Suárez from Anfield.

Having recently secured the Uruguayan international on a new contract, Liverpool are in a position to put off bidders with a price tag well in excess of the club record £50 million they received for Fernando Torres two years ago.

Even a bid that would shatter ­British transfer records would not be welcomed by the Anfield hierarchy who recognise the importance of Suárez to Brendan Rodgers’s rebuilding plans.

The 25 year-old has scored 11 goals in 16 games in all competitions for his club this season, including eight in the Premier League, and despite his chequered disciplinary record, his absence would represent a huge blow to the club’s hopes of regaining their former status.

Suárez himself has shown no inclination for giving up on inspiring the Merseyside club back into the top four and Liverpool will be confident any January move is doomed to fail. Indeed, the club’s priority remains trying to recruit new players when the transfer window reopens.

Rodgers, for his part, reiterated Liverpool’s hard-line stance last weekend. “At this moment in time I’m safe in the knowledge that Luis had the chance to go in the summer,” he said. “There was probably no better time for him to do that with a new manager coming in.

"He could have had an excuse to go, but having spoken to him at length he committed to staying here. He gave us that opportunity to see how it was going to work. It’s up to us as a club to add players that can help support him and move us on.”

Mancini’s determination to test the resolve of Liverpool and their talisman perhaps reveal more about his frustration with strikers Mario Balotelli and Edin Dzeko, both of whom appear to be available for the right price. Balotelli was left out of the squad to face Tottenham Hotspur last weekend and has been at the centre of several disciplinary problems. He has also failed to score a Premier League goal all season.

In contrast, Dzeko is City's leading goalscorer in the league with six goals, but he appears to have lost the confidence of his manager, who has started him just three times. The Bosnia-Herzegovina international has aired his frustrations at being used mainly from the substitutes’ bench and it would be no great surprise for him to be moved on before the start of next season.

With even the normally reliable Argentine duo of Carlos Tevez and Sergio Agüero struggling for form, City and their new director of football, Txiki Begiristain, are prepared to enter the market in the new year, but directors have made it known to Mancini they must embrace new Financial Fair Play rules, making astronomical transfer fees less likely in future.

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:01 am
by Green & Blue
I would rather have Zigic

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:02 am
by BobbyJ1956
Mancini flew to Madrid to check out Falcao, but Falcao's going to Chelsea, he'll pick London over Manchester same as Hazzard did.
So Mancini is lowering his sights, and boy is this lowering them, both in terms of the player and the man.

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:07 am
by Lee_R

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:07 am
by ross.mcfc
I will be morally outraged if we sign him. Then he will be good for us, score against United and I will love him.

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:13 am
by Alioune DVToure
He's a dick but I rate him far more highly than most seem to, as I've said on numerous occasions. I think he's one of the most exciting players in the whole division to watch.

In pure footballing terms, I think he'd be an upgrade on Balotelli (at present) but not the other three.

That said, I do like Mario (but please knuckle down, son!) and I'm happy with what we have.

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:13 am
by Goaters 103
Its silly season again. Last week it was Falcao, the week before it was Neymar, prior to that Busquets - give it a few more days and itll be Soldado.

After all that we will actually sign Zaha in Jan.

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:17 am
by Dronny
I'd rather dine on my own faeces

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:30 am
by BadKompany
Fantastic ability and an unteachable desire to win - exactly the quality we need to progress with his best years still to come,a no brainer if possible.

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:22 am
by Tesl
This is one of those times when I say how much I'd hate to see this happen because hes probably the most detestable player in the whole league. But once he scored a few for you suddenly all would be forgiven...

I'm not sure how well he would fit into our system though since his play is very selfish. Hes Liverpools best player by a mile, but that's not saying much anymore.

One bonus to this of course is it would make Liverpool even worse, because we all know they wouldn't be able to spend that 50m well at all. For that reason alone they should reject all approaches for him.

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 6:53 am
by Dunnylad
As Saurez is currently their only fit striker then I really can't see it from the red scousers point of view & I'm not sure he solves the right problem for us, he might be exciting to watch, but equally wastes plenty of opportunities, which as he is the focal point in the Scousers side is fine as he keeps being given them - as pointed out above he wouldn't be the star player in the City side, therefore wouldn't get the same number of chances and would just piss us all off with his profligacy

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 6:55 am
by freshie
BadKompany wrote:Fantastic ability and an unteachable desire to win - exactly the quality we need to progress with his best years still to come,a no brainer if possible.


That maybe so but he's a complete cunt. I can't stand him and would find it very hard to support a player who behaves the way he does on a football pitch. In all my years of watching football he is the most vile, odious player I have seen. I love the fact that we don't have diving, cheating whining players at our club and don't want that to change. Suarez is a good player but his ethos is to win at any cost, no matter how despicably he may behave in doing so. I don't want that at City

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:35 am
by RodneyRodney
The scousres will demand more than we should be prepared to pay for him

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:01 am
by razor400
i'd rather have herpes.

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:06 am
by King Kev
With some players the fact that they are a cunt is outweighed by their talent, Carlos Tevez for example, however this is not the case with Suarez.

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:16 am
by Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
This has got to be utter bollocks. I saw this suggested on either this forum or another yesterday and I guess some lurking degenerate from the papers did also and printed it as truth. This would be beyond the pale....

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:32 am
by freshie
King Kev wrote:With some players the fact that they are a cunt is outweighed by their talent, Carlos Tevez for example, however this is not the case with Suarez.


Tevez isn't anywhere near the level of suarez's cuntishness though - poles apart

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:38 am
by zuricity
Blown up out of all proportions. Flatulence at it's highest level !

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:11 am
by walmai
freshie wrote:
King Kev wrote:With some players the fact that they are a cunt is outweighed by their talent, Carlos Tevez for example, however this is not the case with Suarez.


Tevez isn't anywhere near the level of suarez's cuntishness though - poles apart


Hmm, interesting.

The Devil's Advocate would remind you that Tevez's poor behaviour twice impacted directly on his team (subs bench fiasco and then flying to a different part of the world).

Suarez's, on the other hand, has always been directed against the other team or officialdom.

For you, its an interesting dilemma, although who he'd replace is a little unclear. He'd want guarantees of a certain hue regarding starting places etc, but I personally wouldn't drop Aguero or Tevez for him. Dzeko strikes me as a different player, so its a toss up between Balo and Suarez, who, on their day, are both unplayable. I s'pose Suarez's day is presently more regular than Balo's.

Informed by the fact that its a practical impossiblity, I can safely say that I'd find it a touch bogus to have such a player wearing WHU colours. He has skills to pay the bills, of course, but also what appears to be a completely ingrained sense of simulation and cheating as highly-honed, oft-repeated skills too.

Put it this way, you won't be making yourselves any more popular with the neutrals or the commentariat by signing him, but what would you, in heart of hearts, care about that??

Re: Luis Suarez

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:18 am
by mr_nool
walmai wrote:
freshie wrote:
King Kev wrote:With some players the fact that they are a cunt is outweighed by their talent, Carlos Tevez for example, however this is not the case with Suarez.


Tevez isn't anywhere near the level of suarez's cuntishness though - poles apart


Hmm, interesting.

The Devil's Advocate would remind you that Tevez's poor behaviour twice impacted directly on his team (subs bench fiasco and then flying to a different part of the world).

Suarez's, on the other hand, has always been directed against the other team or officialdom.

For you, its an interesting dilemma, although who he'd replace is a little unclear. He'd want guarantees of a certain hue regarding starting places etc, but I personally wouldn't drop Aguero or Tevez for him. Dzeko strikes me as a different player, so its a toss up between Balo and Suarez, who, on their day, are both unplayable. I s'pose Suarez's day is presently more regular than Balo's.

Informed by the fact that its a practical impossiblity, I can safely say that I'd find it a touch bogus to have such a player wearing WHU colours. He has skills to pay the bills, of course, but also what appears to be a completely ingrained sense of simulation and cheating as highly-honed, oft-repeated skills too.

Put it this way, you won't be making yourselves any more popular with the neutrals or the commentariat by signing him, but what would you, in heart of hearts, care about that??


I think the Sheikh would very much care about it. City is all about building a good image for Abu Dhabi. Being utter cunts is not good image building.