Page 1 of 1

No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 4:22 pm
by paulmclaren
I reckon he'll be sold or loaned out in January.
The powers that be have had enough of his antics i think and maybe Mancini too.

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 4:42 pm
by Wonderwall
paulmclaren wrote:I reckon he'll be sold or loaned out in January.
The powers that be have had enough of his antics i think and maybe Mancini too.


he is injured mr speculator

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 4:46 pm
by Moonchesteri
Yep as WW said he's injured. You don't happen to work for Daily Mail or similar junk paper?
That's something their journalists usually comes up with

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 4:59 pm
by paulmclaren
Moonchesteri wrote:Yep as WW said he's injured. You don't happen to work for Daily Mail or similar junk paper?
That's something their journalists usually comes up with

I bet he's off soon, that's my opinion anyway, no don't work for now newspaper i wish i did n had there wages they get.

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:30 pm
by london blue 2
Balotelli was missing as well.

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:49 pm
by simon12
london blue 2 wrote:Balotelli was missing as well.


He`ll get his brolly.

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:29 pm
by sandman
paulmclaren wrote:
Moonchesteri wrote:Yep as WW said he's injured. You don't happen to work for Daily Mail or similar junk paper?
That's something their journalists usually comes up with

I bet he's off soon, that's my opinion anyway, no don't work for now newspaper i wish i did n had there wages they get.


I cant take your opinion seriously when you cant even spell his name.

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 6:06 pm
by freshie
sandman wrote:
paulmclaren wrote:
Moonchesteri wrote:Yep as WW said he's injured. You don't happen to work for Daily Mail or similar junk paper?
That's something their journalists usually comes up with

I bet he's off soon, that's my opinion anyway, no don't work for[highlight]now[/highlight] newspaper i wish i did n had [highlight]there[/highlight] wages they get.


I cant take your opinion seriously when you cant even spell his name.


He seems to struggle with spelling in general

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 6:41 pm
by wolfcity

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 6:48 pm
by sandman
wolfcity wrote:Is Balotelli injured? The MEN preview indicates he was available to be picked.

http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/sport/football/manchester_city/s/1593910_manchester-city-v-aston-villa-premier-league-preview


Mancini said he has a problem with his back.

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:06 pm
by Moonchesteri
wolfcity wrote:Is Balotelli injured? The MEN preview indicates he was available to be picked.

[url="http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/sport/football/manchester_city/s/1593910_manchester-city-v-aston-villa-premier-league-preview"]http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/sport/football/manchester_city/s/1593910_manchester-city-v-aston-villa-premier-league-preview[/url]


Actually I also read a story where Mancini said Balo hadn't trained well and was left out for that reason so maybe he wasn't injured and in that case I stand corrected

I have no clue what's the real situation though

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:19 pm
by wolfcity
The only training comment I heard was Mancini saying Balotelli hadn't been putting the effort in that he'd expected. I think if he'd have been injured then Friday's MEN preview would've said so.

Villa have had a very poor start this season and Balotelli wasn't missed yesterday but he'd be an excellent option against Real Madrid considering what he's able to do when he's in the mood.

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:28 pm
by Spurge
wolfcity wrote:The only training comment I heard was Mancini saying Balotelli hadn't been putting the effort in that he'd expected. I think if he'd have been injured then Friday's MEN preview would've said so.

Villa have had a very poor start this season and Balotelli wasn't missed yesterday but he'd be an excellent option against Real Madrid considering what he's able to do when he's in the mood.


I'm sure I saw Bob on video saying both his back and that he hadn't trained well. He also said this weekend that he had no intention of bringing in a striker in Jan as he already has 4 good strikers and therefore wasn't going to sell.

That said Bob will feed the press what he wants to feed them so anything is a possibility

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:49 pm
by Slim
Spurge wrote:
wolfcity wrote:The only training comment I heard was Mancini saying Balotelli hadn't been putting the effort in that he'd expected. I think if he'd have been injured then Friday's MEN preview would've said so.

Villa have had a very poor start this season and Balotelli wasn't missed yesterday but he'd be an excellent option against Real Madrid considering what he's able to do when he's in the mood.


I'm sure I saw Bob on video saying both his back and that he hadn't trained well. He also said this weekend that he had no intention of bringing in a striker in Jan as he already has 4 good strikers and therefore wasn't going to sell.

That said Bob will feed the press what he wants to feed them so anything is a possibility


I am not buying the injury line, I also believe his time with us has come to a close. Never lived up to the hype for me, so no great loss.

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:10 pm
by bigblue
shit thread started by a shit poster

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:56 am
by Chinners
The lack of effort comment was for the Spurs game, the injury comment was for the Villa game ....

Re: No Ballatelli again

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:52 pm
by Swales4ever
Chinners wrote:The lack of effort comment was for the Spurs game, the injury comment was for the Villa game ....

You are supposed to talk b*l**x, not sense... Seeking for pay rise in charge of another dept, maybe?