Page 1 of 4

One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:12 pm
by Beefymcfc
What do you reckon, is Mancini just being bitter?

"Both players came forward with their heads, so if you are going to send off one, then you have to send off both, not only Samir.

"Samir said he touched his head, okay, but the other player has done the same.

"The linesman has a big responsibility also, because it was not a good decision, it is incredible.

"You want to send off both players? Then, okay, the referee was there, he saw everything. The linesman was behind [the players], he could not see.

"We will appeal, sure."

Mancini continued: "I am disappointed with Samir, and he will pay his fine, but the decision was not correct.

"Samir did a mistake, okay, but after why when the other player did the same thing, does he send off only one?

"There are two rules for different teams, and I hate this in football and cannot accept this.

"In life, there is only one rule for everyone.

"This season, I have seen things which are not good.


"For the referees, this is the most easiest thing to do, but I do not want to talk about the referees too much, because I said last time that they had a big lunch for Christmas, and I don't know what [will happen]."

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:21 pm
by sidSmith
Beefymcfc wrote:What do you reckon, is Mancini just being bitter?



Even though you are fishing.... ;-)

Of course not. I think he should shout it as loud as he can and anybody else senior at the club (not players) should join in.

We have to get the inconsistency of all this shit out there. After all, what's the worst that can happen? A fine and touchline ban?

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:22 pm
by ashton287
When nasri pushes his head forward that's a red. Bassong did well not to react to be fair. Nasri is lucky.

Mancini made me laugh about the pass back. Someone needs to explain the new rules of football to him.

I like how Mancini is giving the refs shit though. Taggart gets away with it and it obviously gives his team a massive advantage when refs have tuff decisions to make (see Chelsea away, cheating bastards). I hope Mancini sticks to it and keeps fighting the bent cunts and not just letting their inept performances slide.

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm
by Beefymcfc
ashton287 wrote:When nasri pushes his head forward that's a red. Bassong did well not to react to be fair. Nasri is lucky.

Mancini made me laugh about the pass back. Someone needs to explain the new rules of football to him.

I like how Mancini is giving the refs shit though. Taggart gets away with it and it obviously gives his team a massive advantage when refs have tuff decisions to make (see Chelsea away, cheating bastards). I hope Mancini sticks to it and keeps fighting the bent cunts and not just letting their inept performances slide.

They both went head-to-head mate, Nasri merely came off the aggressor after the follow through.

Compare and contrast to Van Persie. Or what about Zab/Sagna. One rule for one?

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:34 pm
by Swales4ever
sidSmith wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:What do you reckon, is Mancini just being bitter?



Even though you are fishing.... ;-)


Not fishing at all Mate.
it's not for the first time that I strongly suggested that the Club should go all out to hit this shite back.
We live the Age of Media: plenty of means to show this pitiful shame off. whether it may work out, it's another story but in the long term...

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:35 pm
by Blue Since 76
Beefymcfc wrote:They both went head-to-head mate, Nasri merely came off the aggressor after the follow through.

Compare and contrast to Van Persie. Or what about Zab/Sagna. One rule for one?


It was Nasri's head movement to the side that the assistant will have spotted and caused the red. If he hadn't done that, he'd have for away with it. I'd also suspect no grounds for an appeal based on that movement.

As an aside, the rolling round looking like he was dying before jumping up was a disgrace. If you're not injured, don't fake it you cheese eating, surrender monkey.

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:39 pm
by sidSmith
Mancio4ever wrote:Not fishing at all Mate.
it's not for the first time that I strongly suggested that the Club should go all out to hit this shite back.
We live the Age of Media: plenty of means to show this pitiful shame off. whether it may work out, it's another story but in the long term...


You really confuse me at times. I'm pretty sure you repeated exactly what I said...

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:42 pm
by ashton287
Beefymcfc wrote:They both went head-to-head mate, Nasri merely came off the aggressor after the follow through.

Compare and contrast to Van Persie. Or what about Zab/Sagna. One rule for one?


Yeah it just made nasri look worse after the way he jumped up. The ref wasn't going to send nasri off until the Lino told him about that bit I reckon.

That zaba one was a fucking joke. He did absolutely nothing wrong. But he is a player that never gets the benefit of the doubt or any protection of any kind from refs.

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:43 pm
by Swales4ever
sidSmith wrote:
Mancio4ever wrote:Not fishing at all Mate.
it's not for the first time that I strongly suggested that the Club should go all out to hit this shite back.
We live the Age of Media: plenty of means to show this pitiful shame off. whether it may work out, it's another story but in the long term...


You really confuse me at times. I'm pretty sure you repeated exactly what I said...

Never forget that I am a foreigner cunt, just in case.

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:44 pm
by ashton287
Blue Since 76 wrote:
It was Nasri's head movement to the side that the assistant will have spotted and caused the red. If he hadn't done that, he'd have for away with it. I'd also suspect no grounds for an appeal based on that movement.

As an aside, the rolling round looking like he was dying before jumping up was a disgrace. If you're not injured, don't fake it you cheese eating, surrender monkey.


Grounds for appeal.

"It was pissing it down. His head slipped. PROVE IT DIDN'T FA YOU SMELLY OLD CUNTHOLES."

That should be our argument in its entirety.

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:47 pm
by sidSmith
Mancio4ever wrote:Never forget that I am a foreigner cunt


Hmmmm. Bit fucking harsh.

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:48 pm
by Swales4ever
sidSmith wrote:
Mancio4ever wrote:Never forget that I am a foreigner cunt


Hmmmm. Bit fucking harsh.

not if i say it to myself, isn't it?

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:49 pm
by Beefymcfc
Blue Since 76 wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:They both went head-to-head mate, Nasri merely came off the aggressor after the follow through.

Compare and contrast to Van Persie. Or what about Zab/Sagna. One rule for one?


It was Nasri's head movement to the side that the assistant will have spotted and caused the red. If he hadn't done that, he'd have for away with it. I'd also suspect no grounds for an appeal based on that movement.

As an aside, the rolling round looking like he was dying before jumping up was a disgrace. If you're not injured, don't fake it you cheese eating, surrender monkey.

I'm not denying anything, I fucking hate players rolling around, especially ours. However, Van Persie squared up without recourse whilst Zab's got sent off for standing there whilst Sagna did the same as Nasri.

I didn't see Nasri nut Bassong or even give him a rabbit punch, he merely pushed to the side so why is there disparate rules within the game? How about Vinnie's clear taking the ball, why was that a foul?

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:55 pm
by sidSmith
Mancio4ever wrote:
sidSmith wrote:
Mancio4ever wrote:Never forget that I am a foreigner cunt


Hmmmm. Bit fucking harsh.

not if i say it to myself, isn't it?


I guess so, but still.

This debate around consistent refereeing and decisions will never end. How many Kompany like tackles did we see last season following his red? He became the benchmark for what was acceptable for the rest of the season following that.

It's most annoying when you get 2 so close together like Van Pussie and Nasri.

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:06 am
by carl_feedthegoat
Beefymcfc wrote:What do you reckon, is Mancini just being bitter?

"Both players came forward with their heads, so if you are going to send off one, then you have to send off both, not only Samir.

"Samir said he touched his head, okay, but the other player has done the same.

"The linesman has a big responsibility also, because it was not a good decision, it is incredible.

"You want to send off both players? Then, okay, the referee was there, he saw everything. The linesman was behind [the players], he could not see.

"We will appeal, sure."

Mancini continued: "I am disappointed with Samir, and he will pay his fine, but the decision was not correct.

"Samir did a mistake, okay, but after why when the other player did the same thing, does he send off only one?

"There are two rules for different teams, and I hate this in football and cannot accept this.

"In life, there is only one rule for everyone.

"This season, I have seen things which are not good.


"For the referees, this is the most easiest thing to do, but I do not want to talk about the referees too much, because I said last time that they had a big lunch for Christmas, and I don't know what [will happen]."


Well said Mancini - there are 2 rules for 2 different teams..well said !!

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:07 am
by Beefymcfc
sidSmith wrote:
Mancio4ever wrote:
sidSmith wrote:
Mancio4ever wrote:Never forget that I am a foreigner cunt


Hmmmm. Bit fucking harsh.

not if i say it to myself, isn't it?


I guess so, but still.

This debate around consistent refereeing and decisions will never end. How many Kompany like tackles did we see last season following his red? He became the benchmark for what was acceptable for the rest of the season following that.

It's most annoying when you get 2 so close together like Van Pussie and Nasri.

There's no inconsistency, how can it be. If you were a referee and been to all the ref's meetings, you'd know exactly what was what at the time; they'd tell you so.

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:10 am
by Swales4ever
Just watched an additional rant from Bobby during the post match presser on the Premier League News which featurures on loads of websites. on MuEN too

Amazing rant!

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:12 am
by Beefymcfc
Mancio4ever wrote:Just watched an additional rant from Bobby during the post match presser on the Premier League News which featurures on loads of websites.

Amazing rant!

But is he right?

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:13 am
by ronk
We won, he's allowed tell them to go fuck themselves. When we lose it's sour.

Re: One Rule For One

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:17 am
by Swales4ever
Beefymcfc wrote:
Mancio4ever wrote:Just watched an additional rant from Bobby during the post match presser on the Premier League News which featurures on loads of websites.

Amazing rant!

But is he right?

Well, I'd say it's depend on whether You are Bridgey or not...