Page 1 of 4
slightly interesting

Posted:
Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:21 pm
by cjhaz69
it was pointed out to me today that had kompanys ban stood and we assume lescott played we have an identical back 4 formation in country/continent as the rags clichy/evra french nasty/vidic serbia lescott/rio eng zaba/rafeal south america, like i said only slightly interesting but strange non the less
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:35 pm
by Nigels Tackle
i'd love to know what nqdp's view is on this...
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:00 pm
by cjhaz69
Nigels Tackle wrote:i'd love to know what nqdp's view is on this...
whats his view likely to be?
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:04 pm
by DoomMerchant
"slightly" might be a slight exaggeration.
cheers
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:08 pm
by Chinners
Here's another interesting one ... both City & Utd have/can field a team of non English players and they both have 100% record of starting every Premiership match with 11 players (excluding refs obv.)
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:15 pm
by Pretty Boy Lee
Nigels Tackle wrote:i'd love to know what nqdp's view is on this...
Hell tell us when the time is right.
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:19 pm
by Mase
Nigels Tackle wrote:i'd love to know what nqdp's view is on this...
Do any of those players own a lighthouse?
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:24 pm
by Arjan Van Schotte
obsessed.
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:32 pm
by zuricity
cjhaz69 wrote:
whats his view likely to be?
skewiff
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:40 pm
by AG7
Now I admit to having started some useless threads myself ... but this ... really?
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:51 am
by BlueinBosnia
Vaguely enthralling
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:59 am
by dazby
mildly scintillating
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:19 am
by Tokyo Blue
moderately riveting.
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:57 am
by john68
I once saw a badger in Marple...it was just walking down a street.
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:40 am
by Lee_R
Illuminati involved imo. This needs a Youtube conspiracy video.
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:06 am
by Chinners
My slightly interesting fact of the day is that if you type Illuminati backwards into the search bar (adding .com) , you will be tracked by the NSA for the rest of your life!!!
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:10 am
by Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
A friend of mine once brought me a fridge magnet back from a holiday in Wales. This thread just reminded me of it....
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:32 am
by Cocacolajojo1
john68 wrote:I once saw a badger in Marple...it was just walking down a street.
Badgers are impressive animals. If it was possible to domesticate them, I'd have one as a pet momentarily.
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:03 am
by Arjan Van Schotte
if a tree falls on a badger in a forest, and no-one is there to hear it, are you legally allowed to eat it?
Re: slightly interesting

Posted:
Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:05 am
by Nigels Tackle
Arjan Van Schotte wrote:if a tree falls on a badger in a forest, and no-one is there to hear it, are you legally allowed to eat it?
have you ever eaten beaver?