Page 1 of 2

Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:47 pm
by Mase
Time to give the kid at least a start and see what he can do.

He can't be any worse than Nasri and I genuinely believe he'd create more through him wanting to run at defenders.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:49 pm
by Bridge'srightfoot
Mase wrote:Time to give the kid at least a start and see what he can do.

He can't be any worse than Nasri and I genuinely believe he'd create more through him wanting to run at defenders.

Ran at defenders twice tonight. Did more than Nasri.
At least give him a chance. Can't be any worse.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:50 pm
by sheblue
Mase wrote:Time to give the kid at least a start and see what he can do.

He can't be any worse than Nasri and I genuinely believe he'd create more through him wanting to run at defenders.


Agree completely.
Nasri was virtually useless tonight.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:59 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
Mancini will NEVER give him a starting berth unless the whole fuckign squad is injured.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:02 pm
by Tokyo Blue
Sinclair should have had a penalty but that fiddling fat cunt did his usual.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:06 pm
by Mase
Tokyo Blue wrote:Sinclair should have had a penalty but that fiddling fat cunt did his usual.


We saw it with AJ. Those type of players who run directly at opponents with the defender not knowing which way they're going win you penalties that change games.

I lost count of how many AJ got for us.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:07 pm
by Bridge'srightfoot
Tokyo Blue wrote:Sinclair should have had a penalty but that fiddling fat cunt did his usual.

Onuoha nicked the ball. Good tackle but it was good positive play from Sinclair.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:09 pm
by Ted Hughes
Hate to say it but Dowd got that right. Ned got a foot to the ball. Dead lucky not to get sinclair first but he did get to the ball.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:17 pm
by Moonchesteri
Ted Hughes wrote:Hate to say it but Dowd got that right. Ned got a foot to the ball. Dead lucky not to get sinclair first but he did get to the ball.


I'm with Ted on this one. I'm desperate to have ANYTHING OTHER than our performance to moan about but we can only blame ourselves

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:21 pm
by Tokyo Blue
Ted Hughes wrote:Hate to say it but Dowd got that right. Ned got a foot to the ball. Dead lucky not to get sinclair first but he did get to the ball.

I thought he did get Sinclair first.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:23 pm
by Ted Hughes
Tokyo Blue wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:Hate to say it but Dowd got that right. Ned got a foot to the ball. Dead lucky not to get sinclair first but he did get to the ball.

I thought he did get Sinclair first.


Looked clean to me. Very lucky though.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:24 pm
by Arjan Van Schotte
Moonchesteri wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:Hate to say it but Dowd got that right. Ned got a foot to the ball. Dead lucky not to get sinclair first but he did get to the ball.


I'm with Ted on this one. I'm desperate to have ANYTHING OTHER than our performance to moan about but we can only blame ourselves


me too.

clutching at straws to think otherwise imho.

our strikers were off form tonight, as were a few others.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:40 pm
by freshie
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Mancini will NEVER give him a starting berth unless the whole fuckign squad is injured.


Exactly. Why the hell did he sign him?

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:02 am
by Niall Quinns Discopants
freshie wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Mancini will NEVER give him a starting berth unless the whole fuckign squad is injured.


Exactly. Why the hell did he sign him?


What gives you the idea Mancini signed Sinclair?

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 9:58 am
by Blue Since 76
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
What gives you the idea Mancini signed Sinclair?


I agree and I think that's why he has his arse out and won't play him.

Think the three at the back nonsense was also to do with not getting who he wanted. A bit of a protest like 'Arry putting two keepers on the bench. Unfortunately, it worked for 'Arry but it's probably cost us a title.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:19 am
by Ted Hughes
Blue Since 76 wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
What gives you the idea Mancini signed Sinclair?


I agree and I think that's why he has his arse out and won't play him.

Think the three at the back nonsense was also to do with not getting who he wanted. A bit of a protest like 'Arry putting two keepers on the bench. Unfortunately, it worked for 'Arry but it's probably cost us a title.



Ah, a Marwood signing.

I wonder if he will become a Mancini signing eventually, like Garcia is threatening to do, or remain a Marwood signing like AJ ?

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:11 pm
by MilnersJaw
Give the kid a chance for Helen flanagans tits at least

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:04 am
by Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
Ted Hughes wrote:
Blue Since 76 wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
What gives you the idea Mancini signed Sinclair?


I agree and I think that's why he has his arse out and won't play him.

Think the three at the back nonsense was also to do with not getting who he wanted. A bit of a protest like 'Arry putting two keepers on the bench. Unfortunately, it worked for 'Arry but it's probably cost us a title.



Ah, a Marwood signing.

I wonder if he will become a Mancini signing eventually, like Garcia is threatening to do, or remain a Marwood signing like AJ ?

David Platt made it explicitly clear in one of the vids on the official site that Mancini wanted him and that Sinclair knew the score.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:57 am
by phips
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Mancini will NEVER give him a starting berth unless the whole fuckign squad is injured.

Re: Sinclair

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 4:01 pm
by Saul Goodman
Unfortunately sounds like hes only gonna be loaned to Villa