The mancityfans.net football forum

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:06 pm**

Not sure about where you were but ITV's coverage is just crap. The in-play commentary seems very one-sided and the first question Vince gets asked is 'Chelsea should've had a penalty, do you agree?'.

Can't wait for the Aguero foul, honest.

Edit: That interview with Mancini was criminal.

Q1. Should've been a foul for Torres.

Q2. Aguero should've been sent off.

Q3. Are you disappointed that you haven't done better.

End interview.

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:09 pm**

Beefymcfc wrote:Not sure about where you were but ITV's coverage is just crap. The in-play commentary seems very one-sided and the first question Vince gets asked is 'Chelsea should've had a penalty, do you agree?'.

Can't wait for the Aguero foul, honest.

It is times like this that ime glad ime 1000s of miles away , It would do my fookin head in , anyways were on our way to Wembleeeey we shall not be moved ,,

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:12 pm**

Beefymcfc wrote:Not sure about where you were but ITV's coverage is just crap. The in-play commentary seems very one-sided and the first question Vince gets asked is 'Chelsea should've had a penalty, do you agree?'.

Can't wait for the Aguero foul, honest.

Edit: That interview with Mancini was criminal.

Q1. Should've been a foul for Torres.

Q2. Aguero should've been sent off.

Q3. Are you disappointed that you haven't done better.

End interview.

First thing he asked Mancini was if he was relieved like we got away with something, not if he felt joy at a deserved win.

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:18 pm**

Dameerto wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:Not sure about where you were but ITV's coverage is just crap. The in-play commentary seems very one-sided and the first question Vince gets asked is 'Chelsea should've had a penalty, do you agree?'.

Can't wait for the Aguero foul, honest.

Edit: That interview with Mancini was criminal.

Q1. Should've been a foul for Torres.

Q2. Aguero should've been sent off.

Q3. Are you disappointed that you haven't done better.

End interview.

FFOOOKIN HELL, Q are you disapointed that you havent done better ,, A , DONE BETTER THAN WHAT,,,, WINNING YOU FOOKING CLOWN, see hairs on back of neck thats why ime glad I dont have to put up with it , lol

First thing he asked Mancini was if he was relieved like we got away with something, not if he felt joy at a deserved win.

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:19 pm**

Agreed. It's fucking scandalous!

I liked it at half time when they announced that we'd just edged it.....

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:23 pm**

sidSmith wrote:Agreed. It's fucking scandalous!

I liked it at half time when they announced that we'd just edged it.....

Yep me too, just edged it with almost 70 percent possession and something like 14 shots to Chelsea's 3. Such a close first half!

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:31 pm**

Dameerto wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:Not sure about where you were but ITV's coverage is just crap. The in-play commentary seems very one-sided and the first question Vince gets asked is 'Chelsea should've had a penalty, do you agree?'.

Can't wait for the Aguero foul, honest.

Edit: That interview with Mancini was criminal.

Q1. Should've been a foul for Torres.

Q2. Aguero should've been sent off.

Q3. Are you disappointed that you haven't done better.

End interview.

First thing he asked Mancini was if he was relieved like we got away with something, not if he felt joy at a deserved win.

I missed that one, popped out for a tab ;-)

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:36 pm**

The interview with Mancini was an absolute joke. Every question had a negative spin.

I'm not one for the whole 'media against city' but that was a fucking joke.

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:39 pm**

Erm.. Chelsea should have had a penalty but they dont discuss Yayas? ffs

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:47 pm**

It's winding the Rags up something rotten. I've had a few texts saying they've got the real prize and something about 'The Money'.

I've sent back asking what they are worried about, they've got their prize but the seasons over for them. We'll enjoy the run-in with a BIG final still to come.

Loving it ;-)

Why does it upset them so much?

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 5:51 pm**

Lee_R wrote:Erm.. Chelsea should have had a penalty but they dont discuss Yayas? ffs

Haha just had that discussion with a bitter chelsea fan who feels cheated.

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:03 pm**

There's still slow folk out there that can't see it. They call those who can "experts"

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:08 pm**

Original Dub wrote:There's still slow folk out there that can't see it. They call those who can "experts"

Technically they're (he's) right about the expert tag.

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:10 pm**

Dameerto wrote:
Technically they're (he's) right about the expert tag.

I suppose he is

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:17 pm**

There's a refreshingly honest writeup on the Beeb by Phile McNulty:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22056551

Manchester City will meet Wigan Athletic in the FA Cup final after winning an enthralling Wembley encounter with Chelsea.

The 2011 winners looked on course for a comfortable victory as goals either side of half-time from Samir Nasri and Sergio Aguero gave them the lead their dominance deserved.

Chelsea, to their great credit given their recent arduous schedule, somehow summoned up reserves of strength and resilience after Demba Ba's stunning goal set up a grandstand finish that could have forced extra time.

The rejuvenated holders pressed for an equaliser that seemed unlikely for long periods and it took some key interventions from Joe Hart's deputy Costel Pantilimon, particularly from Ba, to assure City of a return to Wembley next month.

And substitute Fernando Torres was furious when referee Chris Foy refused his claims for a penalty in the closing moments when City captain Vincent Kompany pulled his shirt as he raced into the area.

Roberto Mancini's side may be on the brink of losing their Premier League title to Manchester United - but the prospect of silverware for a third successive season keeps their campaign very much alive and they delivered a real show of power for the first hour.

Chelsea interim manager Rafael Benitez will now turn his attention back to the main business of finishing in the top four to ensure Champions League football next season, as well as attempting to win the Europa League.

This was a clash of two of the Premier League's heavyweights and they traded blows to such an extent that many of the players had run themselves to a standstill by the final whistle.

As expected Benitez left the experienced duo of John Terry and Frank Lampard on the bench following their Europa League endeavours against Rubin Kazan in Moscow on Thursday.

And Chelsea's punishing programme appeared to make an impact with a slow start that allowed Manchester City to build instant momentum.

Chelsea keeper Petr Cech had to show quick reflexes to turn away Aguero's effort after he touched on Yaya Toure's shot and was also in action to turn away Carlos Tevez's angled effort at his near post.

It was all hands to the pump for Chelsea as City pressed, with both Branislav Ivanovic and Ryan Bertrand pressed into action to make crucial blocks.

City manager Mancini maintained his FA Cup policy of preferring Pantilimon to England keeper Hart - and he was grateful to captain Kompany for a headed clearance off the line as Eden Hazard's shot broke the shackles on Chelsea.

The goal City merited duly arrived 10 minutes before half-time. Chelsea had not been able to cope with Yaya Toure's forceful surges from midfield. He set up another opportunity for Aguero and when his effort bounced invitingly off Cesar Azpilicueta for Nasri, he made no mistake.

City should have doubled their lead in first-half stoppage time when they broke with five against three in their favour. James Milner's cross was poor but Cech's punch still found Kompany, who should have done better than shoot off target.

It was not to prove an expensive miss as City did get their second two minutes after half-time. A quick free-kick ended with Gareth Barry crossing for Aguero, who showed the superb natural movement and instincts that come naturally to world-class strikers, to rise and head in off the post past the motionless Cech.

As the minutes ticked away Benitez introduced Torres. A goal came within seconds of his arrival but it came from Ba, with the swivelling acrobatic finish that is becoming his trademark as he escaped from Kompany to hook his finish beyond Pantilimon.

The keeper was then forced to dive at Juan Mata's feet amid panic in the City penalty area before reacting well to turn away Ba's shot as Chelsea were suddenly, improbably, resurgent.

In a chaotic final phase, Aguero appeared to trample of David Luiz after bringing him down, which brought some instant retribution from the fired-up Torres.

And Torres was involved in the final contentious moment when his shirt was pulled by Kompany - but referee Foy was unmoved and City survived.

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:29 pm**

Does someone have a gif of the foul on Yaya? Was that in the box? I thought it was outside? We are talking about the incident in the 2nd half right?

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 7:02 pm**

avoidconfusion wrote:Does someone have a gif of the foul on Yaya? Was that in the box? I thought it was outside? We are talking about the incident in the 2nd half right?

Looked at it a couple of times and it was outside the box. Should have been a free kick and yellow.

The shitty media will go witch hunt Sergio now. They cannot find fault in our play so wont spend much time talking of how we ruled the game for seventy minutes. Fuck em.

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 7:08 pm**

ruralblue wrote:
avoidconfusion wrote:Does someone have a gif of the foul on Yaya? Was that in the box? I thought it was outside? We are talking about the incident in the 2nd half right?

Looked at it a couple of times and it was outside the box. Should have been a free kick and yellow.

The shitty media will go witch hunt Sergio now. They cannot find fault in our play so wont spend much time talking of how we ruled the game for seventy minutes. Fuck em.

Strangely, just looked at Sky Sports report and there's only a mention of the incident and they don't make a big thing of it. It maybe due to the race being run in the Prem and that they want the best players to be seen. Not sure what it's like on SSN but it doesn't look like they are pushing it like the Mario incident.

Anybody know otherwise?

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 7:13 pm**

sidSmith wrote:Agreed. It's fucking scandalous!

I liked it at half time when they announced that we'd just edged it.....

Andy Townsend ex-Chelsea what do you expect?

Unbelievable how they saw the 1st half as even. "Me Bothered" (as Adrian Chiles GF would say)

Posted: **Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:18 pm**

Right place to reload the quote of the semi:

carl_feedthegoat wrote:[highlight]its only those 2 fuckign spastics in rag underpants[/highlight]

To anyone interested here downloading links of those spastics commentary in HD:

1st half:
http://hotfile.com/dl/203030509/d4f31c7 ... t.mpg.html
2nd half:
http://hotfile.com/dl/203037278/2d71042 ... t.mpg.html

The mancityfans.net football forum

Media Coverage Of The Semi

Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi

Re: Media Coverage Of The Semi