The mancityfans.net football forum

You all know at this stage, I'm a firm believer that the media are biased towards the rags and against city in general. I know there are two or three of you on this board that can't see this - that's fine. Maybe steer clear of this thread so...

Anyway, I saw this one today and had to laugh...

http://www.itv.com/sport/football/artic ... our-years/?

Very strange, because it could have been worded "Manuel Pellegrini has a better record against both Fergie and Moyes in the last four years".

The fact that City have had the better of the rags recently is also wordy of a headline. But no, there's a way around it to suit the rag fucks and this shithead journalist went for it.

Sigh.

Original Dub wrote:You all know at this stage, I'm a firm believer that the media are biased towards the rags and against city in general. I know there are two or three of you on this board that can't see this - that's fine. Maybe steer clear of this thread so...

Anyway, I saw this one today and had to laugh...

http://www.itv.com/sport/football/artic ... our-years/?

Very strange, because it could have been worded "Manuel Pellegrini has a better record against both Fergie and Moyes in the last four years".

The fact that City have had the better of the rags recently is also wordy of a headline. But no, there's a way around it to suit the rag fucks and this shithead journalist went for it.

Sigh.

I remember when i was paying sky 70 odd quid a month for their "product" when after the away defeat to bayern they played "price tag" as their closing music. How amusing I thought..how fucking snidey....i reckon ive saved about two grand since cancelling...feels good. the club should be hardening its stance on shit like this.... not the fair criticism...City deserved it at times last season...Im not advocating brown tongues..but the one eyed virtual slander..I dont think its warrented. Is it getting better? hmmm...when we lose you can sense the glee.

Bianchi on Ice wrote:

Original Dub wrote:You all know at this stage, I'm a firm believer that the media are biased towards the rags and against city in general. I know there are two or three of you on this board that can't see this - that's fine. Maybe steer clear of this thread so...

Anyway, I saw this one today and had to laugh...

http://www.itv.com/sport/football/artic ... our-years/?

Very strange, because it could have been worded "Manuel Pellegrini has a better record against both Fergie and Moyes in the last four years".

The fact that City have had the better of the rags recently is also wordy of a headline. But no, there's a way around it to suit the rag fucks and this shithead journalist went for it.

Sigh.

I remember when i was paying sky 70 odd quid a month for their "product" when after the away defeat to bayern they played "price tag" as their closing music. How amusing I thought..how fucking snidey....i reckon ive saved about two grand since cancelling...feels good. the club should be hardening its stance on shit like this.... not the fair criticism...City deserved it at times last season...Im not advocating brown tongues..but the one eyed virtual slander..I dont think its warrented. Is it getting better? hmmm...when we lose you can sense the glee.

Well it isn't getting any better. I'm pretty sure the owner and co have a policy of no retaliation and that it shows more class, but it seems to allow the press to run riot.

That old cunt used to ban journos that questioned him. It worked just fine for them. In fact, there is still a daily wankfest over them either on SSN or the papers.

I wanted to leave Sky at the end of the season and I didn't. I'm regretting it now.

Its pretty desperate they they realise gollum hasnt a clue and yet they wheel this wast of binary out, on top of carefull editing of his interviews so the rag fans dont get to see how out of his depth he is and how much the rest of the club are just using him as a puppet.