MilnersJaw wrote:Fesan wrote:
Certain players would increase a clubs marketvalue by so much that it is fiscally responsible to pay that much. Messi is one of the few players like that. I am sure he would increase the income of the club by more than the pricetag+wages.
Only if we retain a chunk of his images rights which I doubt he would do.
We wouldnt need to do that. Messi would keep 100% of any personal deals he does individually (boot deals, pepsi etc). He would however have to do some promotional works for the club (allow his image to be used on a asian credit card etc). this would be MCFC income.
I totally agree with what Fesan says, our marketvalue skyrockets with Messi and the numbers stack up.
So lets say Messi cost a transfer fee of £150m and a wage of £300k per week. over a 5 year contract, that works out at £45m per year.
We can then negotiate a better shirt deal from £12m to £30m, an increase of £18m mainly due to Messi. We could renegotiate the Etihad deal from £35m per year to £50m, an increase of £15m (with Messi and co. to appear in a few adverts. all we would need then is 3-4 companies willing to pay £3-5m per year to use MCFC logo and image of players on their product and we essentially have Messi for FREE.
PS. I may have overestimated the shirt deal as we would probably be due an increase anyway but then i think i have underestimated the Etihad deal.