Page 1 of 6

Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:17 am
by Lee_R
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... ok-3124483


When the chapter on the most successful period of Manchester City’s history is written, Garry Cook should feature ­prominently.

Names such as Roberto Mancini, Sergio Aguero, Yaya Toure and Manuel Pellegrini will all be integral to the story – and deservedly so.

But everything City have recently won – and are yet to achieve – was only made possible because Cook sold Sheikh Mansour a dream that dragged the club from the brink of ­bankruptcy to a journey which has taken the Blues into football’s elite.

“I would never lay claim to being the saviour of Manchester City,” said the man who wasn’t known for bouts of understatement during his rollercoaster three-year ride at the Etihad.

But that’s exactly how Cook should be remembered.

Yes, there were the PR gaffes, such as welcoming City legend Uwe Rosler into the Manchester United Hall of Fame at a supporters' club dinner. And many fans didn't believe the former Nike marketing man when he told them in 2008 that City would not just take on bitter rivals United, but the entire world.

When Cook mistakenly sent an email to the mother of Nedum Onuoha in 2011, which appeared to mock her battle with cancer, he resigned – just four months after City had won the FA Cup.

He says he was left “heartbroken, emotionally wrecked” when he lost the job that had already cost him his marriage.

Yet Cook is still held in such esteem inside the corridors of power at the Etihad that he has been invited to watch City's Champions League tie with Barcelona next week from the comfort of the heated seats in the directors' box.

And no doubt, he will cast his mind back to May 2008, when he took up Thaksin Shinawatra’s offer to quit his role in charge of Brand Jordan at Nike to become City’s chief executive.

It didn't take him long to discover that the former prime minister of Thailand was too beleaguered by accusations of human rights abuses and fraud in his homeland to be concerned by the state of his Premier League investment.

“It took me about 10 days to inform Shinawatra that he had no option but to find a buyer for the club,” Cook revealed. “If he hadn’t taken my advice, then the consequences for City would have been absolutely disastrous.

“I have to be honest here, we were in an extremely bad and precarious place. We were standing on the edge of the precipice.

“The model being used wasn’t sustainable. For example, we were leveraging money against future ­television revenues to put deposits down for new players.

“That, in itself, is a dangerous ­position to be in. But it was just the tip of the iceberg.

“It got to the point where John Wardle, the former City chairman who had sold the club to Shinawatra, was lending us money to pay the wages.

“John was an integral part of keeping City afloat. But, even with his generosity, City were, quite literally, just moments away from it all going horribly wrong.

“Thankfully, I was able to sell Sheikh Mansour – or at least the people who work for him – the dream I had for the club when I decided to leave Nike.

“It was a perfect storm. City couldn’t have been in a worse situation and Abu Dhabi was looking to invest in a Premier League football club as a vehicle to promote the nation."

More than £1billion has since been spent transforming a club that had become synonymous with glorious failure. But Cook soon found out that throwing money at problems that had dogged City for decades wasn't the only solution.

He also had to win the hearts of minds of those people who already had a huge emotional stake in the club.

“I still have the Power Point presentation that I made to executives of the Abu Dhabi United Group,” Cook added.

“There were three other clubs who Abu Dhabi were looking at, but we ticked all the boxes: We could deliver the name Manchester - and I admit that I unashamedly used the global recognition of our rivals Manchester United to push our cause; we could deliver the name City - something that could become a powerful brand - and we could also deliver a fantastic stadium surrounded by 200 acres of land that was ripe for development.

Manchester City manager Roberto Mancini (L) looks on with Chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak (C) and Chief Executive Garry Cook during the FA Community Shield match City boys: Cook (right) with title-winning boss Roberto Mancini (left) and chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak


"I addressed men of real intelligence and insight who recognised the potential of Manchester City. They knew the dream I had was realistic."

He added: "It was ironic that I had a much harder task convincing the people who were working at the club and even many of City’s magnificent supporters.

“When I went to the Burnage branch of our supporters’ club to tell them that we would beat United and that one day we would win the Premier League and regularly compete in the Champions League, they looked at me like I was a madman.

"Employees who worked for the club used to celebrate when we had reached the 40 points needed to stay in the Premier League. So there was 35 years of failure to address. We had to change the culture of the club and and rebuild a lot of the existing infrastructure.

"It had to be revolution rather than evolution and I know I upset a lot of people with some of the things I said.

"We always strived to stay close to our roots, not to forget the history of the club, even though at times that history was about failure. But we also had to draw a line under looking back sentimentally about the bad old days. It had to be year zero.

"I came from an American culture. I came from a great company like Nike, where we never once worried about what adidas were doing. We looked at what Disney were doing. So when I came to Manchester City and I was told that Manchester United were the team we had to challenge, I didn't stop for a second to think about how we could emulate what they were doing at Old Trafford - the clubs I set my sights on were ­Barcelona and Real Madrid.

“While other people kept talking about whether we could become bigger than United, I wanted us to become bigger than ­Barcelona.”

Cook is currently the executive vice-president of the Ultimate Fighting Championship, tasked with promoting mixed martial arts tournaments in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

He owns properties in London and Las Vegas, but he calls Manchester home - despite the emotional scars he carries from his time at City.

“I’m proud of the work I did at City,” he said. “Emotionally, I suffered, but, ­professionally I was the luckiest man in the world.

“I lived the job for 24-hours a day. I breathed it, I ate it, I slept it.

"My kids were bullied at school because of who I was and my wife wanted to move the family back to America. I wanted to see the job through and it cost me my marriage. It was like having a lover.

“I did make mistakes and one huge error of judgement cost me my job. I offered my resignation because I didn’t want to embarrass the club, but I was heartbroken, emotionally wrecked.

“My family are back in Portland, Oregon, while the place I call home is just outside Manchester, in Cheshire, because I fell in love with this part of the world.

“Of course, I have regrets, but I think I helped in some little way to help Manchester City make history.

“I don’t think what we did will did will ever be done again.”


Yaya Toure is the true talisman of Manchester City’s emergence as a major footballing force.

Ex-City chief executive Garry Cook lavished a fortune on players in the aftermath of Sheikh Mansour’s 2008 takeover.

Cook sanctioned a £32m deal for Brazilian superstar Robinho and he landed Carlos Tevez the next year.

But Cook rates getting Toure as the best piece of business he ever did – and insists the Ivorian didn’t leave Barcelona for the £200,000-a-week wages.

“Yaya Toure was the one player who became the catalyst for change at the football club,” said Cook.

“He has become City’s talisman. The popular perception is that we signed Robinho and Carlos Tevez to attract other players to the club.

“But both of those guys were in it for what they could get rather than what they could do for City.

“Yaya was different. He came and said, ‘I’m going to make this club great’. He was THE ONE. After we signed him, every top player began to see the possibilities at City.

“David Silva, for example. If we hadn’t signed Yaya, I don’t think David would have come.

"Once we signed Yaya, all the others followed. He was like a Pied Piper."
Kaka regrets snubbing City


Garry Cook insists he was right to label AC Milan “bottlers” for reneging on a deal to sell Kaka to City five years ago.

And former City chief executive Cook says the Brazilian ace has since admitted to him that he regrets not completing a world-record £100m transfer to the Etihad. He was sold to Real Madrid instead that summer, and is now back at Milan.

Cook was slammed for his handling of negotiations, but claims to have hard evidence that proves the move was done until Milan owner - and Italian prime minister - Silvio Berlusconi blocked the deal to boost his political standing.

Cook said: “I received a lot of criticism for saying that AC Milan bottled it over Kaka – but there is no other way to describe it.

"I've still got the documentation that confirmed Milan had agreed to sell the player to us. In fact, I have got a picture where I am holding up a City shirt with Kaka on the back with Milan CEO Adriano Galliani. That's how far we had got.

"But it was clear they had underestimated how selling Kaka would upset the fans and when I went to negotiate with the player's father about terms, it was cleat something wasn't right. They started making the most outrageous demands. There was no way we could meet those terms and I remember asking what the hell was going on.

"When I saw television pictures of Kaka stood on a balcony waving a Milan shirt over his head, I knew it was time to get out of there."

Cook added: "My belief is that Berlusconi recognised a PR opportunity. Mr Berlusconi is a skilled politician and it seems that he saw a chance to make some political capital for himself with the people of Milan.

“Milan agreed to sell Kaka to us. When they saw the negative reaction of the fans, they went back on their word.

"I later saw Kaka at Robinho's wedding. He admitted that maybe he should have signed for City and that maybe we could try for him again. I told him that ship had sailed.

"I recently met Kaka again at a UFC event and this time he admitted that he deeply regretted not signing for City."

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:24 am
by Nickyboy
Good read that. Quite fond of Garry the gaffe

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 4:28 am
by nottsblue
Even though it's from the Mirror, there's probably a lot of truth there. Reckon the details about the Kaka deal are probably correct and that we had actually agreed the transfer, as after the Milan game on the Saturday/Sunday he looked as if he was saying his goodbyes, then when the fans got angry and upset he was being sold the owner shit himself.

Cook did great things for us, helping in no small way to change the fabric and mentality of the club and the way it was run as a business. I for one will remember him fondly. Forward with Franny anyone...

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 8:09 am
by Beefymcfc
I'm one of those that has a lot of time for Garry Cook. What he says there is what was happening, and happened through his time with the club. He was fixated on beating the Rags and going global, the same, and probably more than any of our fans could have envisaged.

Some may say that these people aren't important but for me he will go down in our history as a City Legend, just as will those who brought us the cups.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:19 am
by Grimble101
This guy lost his family and his kids got bullied at school. All for city enough said.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 10:31 am
by Piccsnumberoneblue
Garry Cook got the Blue bug. He was a complete gent and all those who knew him will tell you that he wanted to take us all the way. And he would have done. I believed him over Milan's behaviour at the time and still do. As things have worked out, it's not hard to see. He also told us we were well advanced at one point in trying to get Tranny.
Shame he aint around now. He genuinely loved City and understoof the value of the fans. Good Man.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:13 am
by mancitymark
He very nearly did a deal to sign Rooney from the Rags in 2010

We can debate all day long if that would have been a good or bad thing, but one thing is for sure, it showed the scum we meant business and Ferguson nearly shit a brick.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:25 pm
by Lee_R
For me Bernstein was a professional and did a great job but with Garry Cook it just goes to show sometimes there are totally different levels of character and operation. The guy dared to dream and dream big. He definitely made calculated risks and got it spot on most of the time. Off field Legend!

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:03 am
by gary james
Garry did more than most to make City a success. I spent hours interviewing him, Khaldoon and others for a book I was writing between 2008 and 2012 (sadly, not yet published!) and Garry's vision for City was clear. I included a line in one of my books from Khaldoon which basically said that Garry was one of the main reasons they bought City. For me that said it all.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:04 am
by Wonderwall
That was a great read. Garry sometimes made the odd gaffe, but he was certainly a very talented lad. He took us from poor lickle citeh, to Premier league superpower and a team that the european powerhouses want to avoid.

Shame he sent that email as I think he would still be in a role with City now, maybe not the spokesperson as we seem to be the ultimate professional PR machine nowadays. However, I hope we continue to treat him with the fondness he deserves.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:19 am
by ross.mcfc
Wonderwall wrote:
Shame he sent that email as I think he would still be in a role with City now, maybe not the spokesperson as we seem to be the ultimate professional PR machine nowadays. However, I hope we continue to treat him with the fondness he deserves.


When it happened I was told by someone who knew him that he would be back at City and be the guy in charge of our PR in the states. This is well before we heard about NYC. I wonder if he will be involved there somehow.

I understand even before the email scandal he wanted to head back to the states for family reasons. The email incident just hastened his exit. Much like a cabinet minister having to resign he will be back soon in a new position and all will be forgotten.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 10:40 am
by Cocacolajojo1
With this article we might perhaps finally be able to get Thakshin out of our system. There is still the odd fan saying that "he got us sold to the sheikh and I'll always be grateful for that". No he didn't, Cookie did. Thakshin put us in financial dire straits, used money saved by the previous owners and then had to borrow money from him anyway and if it hadn't been for Cookie we'd be in deep shit.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:07 am
by Wonderwall
Cocacolajojo wrote:With this article we might perhaps finally be able to get Thakshin out of our system. There is still the odd fan saying that "he got us sold to the sheikh and I'll always be grateful for that". No he didn't, Cookie did. Thakshin put us in financial dire straits, used money saved by the previous owners and then had to borrow money from him anyway and if it hadn't been for Cookie we'd be in deep shit.


thats a good point, however, if we werent in dire straits Cooke may never have met with the Sheiks trustees. So we still have to thank Thaksin in a back handed kind of way LOL

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:13 am
by gary james
On Thaksin... still not as straightforward as good v evil I'm afraid. Thaksin had some great ideas (and some ridiculous ones too!) and did bring Garry in to make them happen - Garry then realised that the only way out of the mire was to sell the club and the rest is history. Let's not forget that the FA/PL were happy that Thaksin was a fit and proper person (hmm!) and that those that controlled the majority of shares pre-Thaksin did believe that he was the right man to sell to and therefore to take the club forward.

Worth also noting in all of this that Garry's point on convincing Thaksin to sell is significant - although many believe Thaksin was only in it for the short term, Thaksin did not originally see it like that. I was in his presentations when he talked about his long term vision for City (not as significant as it became when GC arrived but significantly better than what had gone before).

My gut feel from what I saw and the interviews from that period I performed with Wardle, Khaldoon etc. is that Thaksin assumed it would be easy to find success at City and that that would then generate a good income for him (let's not forget that ultimately MCFC has to make a profit for its current owner - whether we like it or not that's the way football is now). Once his funds were locked and he was struggling to raise a few quid for himself, never mind the club, Garry recognised the issues and convinced him to sell before it went under.

It makes you wonder what would have happened had either Garry not arrived or Thaksin's funds had not been frozen. Phew!

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:22 am
by Wonderwall
gary james wrote:On Thaksin... still not as straightforward as good v evil I'm afraid. Thaksin had some great ideas (and some ridiculous ones too!) and did bring Garry in to make them happen - Garry then realised that the only way out of the mire was to sell the club and the rest is history. Let's not forget that the FA/PL were happy that Thaksin was a fit and proper person (hmm!) and that those that controlled the majority of shares pre-Thaksin did believe that he was the right man to sell to and therefore to take the club forward.

Worth also noting in all of this that Garry's point on convincing Thaksin to sell is significant - although many believe Thaksin was only in it for the short term, Thaksin did not originally see it like that. I was in his presentations when he talked about his long term vision for City (not as significant as it became when GC arrived but significantly better than what had gone before).

My gut feel from what I saw and the interviews from that period I performed with Wardle, Khaldoon etc. is that Thaksin assumed it would be easy to find success at City and that that would then generate a good income for him (let's not forget that ultimately MCFC has to make a profit for its current owner - whether we like it or not that's the way football is now). Once his funds were locked and he was struggling to raise a few quid for himself, never mind the club, Garry recognised the issues and convinced him to sell before it went under.

It makes you wonder what would have happened had either Garry not arrived or Thaksin's funds had not been frozen. Phew!


Cheers for the insight Gary, makes you realise we really have been very fortunate. From having the likes of Wardle there to bail us out short term, to having someone like Garry who realised the danger signs early enough to make a difference... then there is Sheik Mansour.

2 FA Cup finals, a League title and a League Cup final coming up along with a double header against Barcelona. WOW! We are very lucky indeed.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 11:31 am
by Ted Hughes
gary james wrote:On Thaksin... still not as straightforward as good v evil I'm afraid. Thaksin had some great ideas (and some ridiculous ones too!) and did bring Garry in to make them happen - Garry then realised that the only way out of the mire was to sell the club and the rest is history. Let's not forget that the FA/PL were happy that Thaksin was a fit and proper person (hmm!) and that those that controlled the majority of shares pre-Thaksin did believe that he was the right man to sell to and therefore to take the club forward.

Worth also noting in all of this that Garry's point on convincing Thaksin to sell is significant - although many believe Thaksin was only in it for the short term, Thaksin did not originally see it like that. I was in his presentations when he talked about his long term vision for City (not as significant as it became when GC arrived but significantly better than what had gone before).

My gut feel from what I saw and the interviews from that period I performed with Wardle, Khaldoon etc. is that Thaksin assumed it would be easy to find success at City and that that would then generate a good income for him (let's not forget that ultimately MCFC has to make a profit for its current owner - whether we like it or not that's the way football is now). Once his funds were locked and he was struggling to raise a few quid for himself, never mind the club, Garry recognised the issues and convinced him to sell before it went under.

It makes you wonder what would have happened had either Garry not arrived or Thaksin's funds had not been frozen. Phew!


Aston Villa.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 2:29 pm
by Cocacolajojo1
gary james wrote:On Thaksin... still not as straightforward as good v evil I'm afraid. Thaksin had some great ideas (and some ridiculous ones too!) and did bring Garry in to make them happen - Garry then realised that the only way out of the mire was to sell the club and the rest is history. Let's not forget that the FA/PL were happy that Thaksin was a fit and proper person (hmm!) and that those that controlled the majority of shares pre-Thaksin did believe that he was the right man to sell to and therefore to take the club forward.

Worth also noting in all of this that Garry's point on convincing Thaksin to sell is significant - although many believe Thaksin was only in it for the short term, Thaksin did not originally see it like that. I was in his presentations when he talked about his long term vision for City (not as significant as it became when GC arrived but significantly better than what had gone before).

My gut feel from what I saw and the interviews from that period I performed with Wardle, Khaldoon etc. is that Thaksin assumed it would be easy to find success at City and that that would then generate a good income for him (let's not forget that ultimately MCFC has to make a profit for its current owner - whether we like it or not that's the way football is now). Once his funds were locked and he was struggling to raise a few quid for himself, never mind the club, Garry recognised the issues and convinced him to sell before it went under.

It makes you wonder what would have happened had either Garry not arrived or Thaksin's funds had not been frozen. Phew!


I'm sure he had visions and I'm sure he could persuade people with rhetorics. He was the prime minister of Thailand after all. But... for the know how... I remember one anecdote from Hans Backe who said that him, Sven-Göran and Thakshin attended a CL-game at the Emirates and after the game was over and they were heading out of the suite, Thakshin got animated and started gesturing for them to come back and watch the field as the game was continuing. Turns out it was the unused subs who were destressing after the game.

As you say Gary, he had quite far-reaching ambitions and plans for his venture into the PL but I don't think it was based on much knowledge of what was required of him. For me, any owner who goes into football with the ambitions of making money is either Ken Bates or haven't heard the saying that football is a perfect way to make a vast fortune smaller.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:23 pm
by ross.mcfc
I've always said that there is a very good book out there waiting to be written about Thaksins year at City.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:41 pm
by Bridge'srightfoot
I remember we were all gutted when we missed out on Kaka, my self included. That really was a blessing in disguise on reflection. His career went quickly downhill and we would have been a laughing stock for spunking 100 million on him.
Funny how that one worked out.

Re: Good ol Garry.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:53 pm
by gary james
Cocacolajojo wrote:I remember one anecdote from Hans Backe who said that him, Sven-Göran and Thakshin attended a CL-game at the Emirates and after the game was over and they were heading out of the suite, Thakshin got animated and started gesturing for them to come back and watch the field as the game was continuing. Turns out it was the unused subs who were destressing after the game.


Yes, there are quite a few of these stories. When I was told this one (in a voice recorded interview) by a former City director, it was the City game at Arsenal in 2007-08 (4th game) and it was one of the other City directors (best not put her name on here) who thought there was a '3rd half'.

There was also the time Thaksin was told how tough the opening 3 games of Sven's reign would be (remember it included MUFC in the days when they were tough to beat) and so he phoned Sven and told him that 3 victories were needed - as if Sven didn't know the significance of those games and as if it was that easy. In the end we won all 3 and Thaksin thought his approach worked!

Mind you I was also present in the meeting when Thaksin was outlining his plans. One of which was "We will be opening a store in the City". A staff member interrupted him and said "yes, we're already doing that. It'll be in the Arndale". John Wardle "er, sorry. Dr Thaksin means London when he talks about the City, not Market Street". In that brief exchange the rise in ambition was clear. Thankfully, in the end Thaksin appointed Cook and Garry convinced him to sell, but some of his ideas were interesting.