Beefymcfc wrote:It's Maureens to lose. Simple as that.
At this stage of the season it's all down to which teams have the bottle and fortitude to go on and by the looks of his interviews of late, it's him that's having to put pressure on the rest, usually meaning that he's shitting himself already.
Let's get one thing straight, he's got a hell of a squad at his disposal and hasn't had any real injury worries with his best team. Now he's got both his CBs out it maybe that he feels a little less confident but at the same time, he's got very decent replacements and the way they set-up not to concede is always going to make it difficult for a team to get 3 points against them.
I wonder how much the team cost that was sent out against us? Can't be much less than ours and if I recall correctly, haven't they spent more than any other club over the last few years?
Bourinho and his media sidekicks make it sound like they are doing a 'RasherChops', growing and nurturing his players in plant pots, in a little greenhouse just on the outskirts of Chelsea when the reality is they've bought real quality players, at a price.
If he fails to win anything with that team then I'm sure RA will have something to say, it's one of the best teams I've seen in the Prem; ever.
Technically, it's ours or Arsenal's to lose - if either of us win all our remaining games, we couldn't be caught. Both Chelsea and Liverpool need others to drop points as well.
Some of the other mangers need to remind the press that Chelsea have won European competitions in the last two seasons. And then sacked their manager. Maureen's statements that they aren't expected to win anything are wide of the mark, especially if he wants to keep his job.