Tony P wrote:Cos his hair is shit.
aaron bond wrote:
HOWEVER...that debate really doesn't need to go ahead today.
:-)
Crossie wrote:Rested because demichellis can't play vs barca? Give Lescott today off, freshen up this week then play in the next few to get sharp for barca.
Bleed_Blue wrote:Crossie wrote:Rested because demichellis can't play vs barca? Give Lescott today off, freshen up this week then play in the next few to get sharp for barca.
Guy who got us to finals, played every minute of the cup is rested. Dont fucking kid me, Lescott deserved more than panti to be out on the field today. I didnt want to get started on this but, lescott omission is plain stupid and unfair.
Glad we won
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:I can't actually believe some people blamed Demichellis for Sunderland's goal. That was Vinnie's fault. All he had to do was shepherd him into the channels, he had no support, he didn't need to win the ball.
Vinnie's fault.
Breks wrote:Bridge'srightfoot wrote:I can't actually believe some people blamed Demichellis for Sunderland's goal. That was Vinnie's fault. All he had to do was shepherd him into the channels, he had no support, he didn't need to win the ball.
Vinnie's fault.
I agree with that. Vinny could have forced him away from goal.
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:I can't actually believe some people blamed Demichellis for Sunderland's goal. That was Vinnie's fault. All he had to do was shepherd him into the channels, he had no support, he didn't need to win the ball.
Vinnie's fault.
Ted Hughes wrote:Demichelis has had some Lescott like treatment today.
He did ok; some great defensive clearances & decent interceptions. Lescott would probably have struggled for pace v the geezer who scored & handed him over into the safe hands of VK to push him out whilst they regrouped. Oops.
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Breks wrote:Bridge'srightfoot wrote:I can't actually believe some people blamed Demichellis for Sunderland's goal. That was Vinnie's fault. All he had to do was shepherd him into the channels, he had no support, he didn't need to win the ball.
Vinnie's fault.
I agree with that. Vinny could have forced him away from goal.
Sometimes it's far better for defenders to delay a player or just jockey him rather than dive in to try and win the ball.
Borini was by himself and we had two back. If Vinnie had just stood his ground, at best Borini would have got a corner.
I suppose he made up for it with that last ditch tackle later on but how anyone could attribute any blame to Demichellis for the goal is ridiculous.
Bleed_Blue wrote:Bridge'srightfoot wrote:I can't actually believe some people blamed Demichellis for Sunderland's goal. That was Vinnie's fault. All he had to do was shepherd him into the channels, he had no support, he didn't need to win the ball.
Vinnie's fault.
Its not about the goal or Demi, but someone who played his way to final deserves to start.
Why was Panti played instead of Joe ? Because Joe is first choice in league and champions league and if we reach finals, he will be the one playing not panti.
Similarly Lescott deserved more for getting us to the finals than being on the bench.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Nigels Tackle, nottsblue and 209 guests