The mancityfans.net football forum

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:10 pm**

Starting 11 taken from Derby, transfer fee's taken from http://transferleague.co.uk/

Manchester United

01 de Gea - £18,900,000
02 Rafael - £2,500,000
03 Evra - £5,500,000
16 Carrick - £18,600,000
05 Ferdinand - £27,550,000
04 Jones - £17,000,000
23 Cleverley - Academy
31 Fellaini - £27,500,000
10 Rooney - £27,000,000
08 Mata - £37,100,000
19 Welbeck - Academy

Total Spend - £181,650,000

Manchester City

01 Hart - £1,500,000
05 Zabaleta - £6,500,000
22 Clichy - £7,000,000
25 Fernandinho - £30,000,000
04 Kompany - £6,700,000
26 Demichelis - £3,500,000
15 Jesús Navas - £22,900,000
42 Yaya Touré - £24,000,000
10 Dzeko - £27,000,000
21 Silva - £25,000,000
08 Nasri - £22,000,000

Total Spend - £176,100,000

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:13 pm**

Send it to Sky.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:13 pm**

Ted Hughes wrote:Send it to Sky.

................. to Martin Tyler

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:18 pm**

Take £8m off that Navas fee as he cost £14.9 according to multiple reports.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:32 pm**

Add about 5½ to Ferdinand, after clauses were triggered they closed the book on his transfer at £33M.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:32 pm**

And I am sure Joe Hart didn't cost 1.5 million either?

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:41 pm**

Think Joe cost about £600K from Shrewsbury. Maybe even in Frank Clarke's brief reign

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:51 pm**

Joe Hart cost £1.5M because he got an England cap.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:59 pm**

Slim wrote:Add about 5½ to Ferdinand, after clauses were triggered they closed the book on his transfer at £33M.

Ferna cost City £30m, it was widely reported that Ferna waived a £4m bonus from Shaktar in order to finalise the move. Shaktar confirmed on their OS that they received £34m ( €40m ) so if them reports are to be believed then City forked out £30m.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:00 pm**

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Slim wrote:Add about 5½ to Ferdinand, after clauses were triggered they closed the book on his transfer at £33M.

Ferna cost City £30m, it was widely reported that Ferna waived a £4m bonus from Shaktar in order to finalise the move. Shaktar confirmed on their OS that they received £34m ( €40m ) so if them reports are to be believed then City forked out £30m.

He said Ferdinand mate. Not Fernandino!

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:52 pm**

Ted Hughes wrote:Send it to Sky.

Exactly. Every time we lose, the cost of the opposition team is the first graphic they love to show. No surprise that they've chosen to ignore it this time.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:53 pm**

Burt wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Slim wrote:Add about 5½ to Ferdinand, after clauses were triggered they closed the book on his transfer at £33M.

Ferna cost City £30m, it was widely reported that Ferna waived a £4m bonus from Shaktar in order to finalise the move. Shaktar confirmed on their OS that they received £34m ( €40m ) so if them reports are to be believed then City forked out £30m.

He said Ferdinand mate. Not Fernandino!

So he did, d'oh! My sincere apologies Slim.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:35 pm**

Ted Hughes wrote:Send it to Sky.

Done, also put it in the comments section on every article there (Subject to approval).

I cannot see them being approved as they don't show the image of utd that sky are trying to portray.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:38 pm**

Slim wrote:Joe Hart cost £1.5M because he got an England cap.

We bought Hart for £100,000.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:53 pm**

shortagain wrote:Think Joe cost about £600K from Shrewsbury. Maybe even in Frank Clarke's brief reign

This is the amount I recall , although I thought he signed during psycho' reign.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:56 pm**

chef wrote: This is the amount I recall , although I thought he signed during psycho' reign.

Pearce signed for something like that but we have paid add-ons since as he has progressed.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:04 pm**

Popped home today and caught a little of that new Footballers Football Show on Sky and they were showing the spending of the PL, including wages, with us at the top. They then went on to break it down but the caption looked as though we were at least 100 million above everybody else. Is this right?

They also had some journo (I think) who stated that it would be a 'Novelty' to see City kicked out of the CL for a couple of seasons but concluded it couldn't last. Seemed to sum up the show for me.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:09 pm**

sandman wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:Send it to Sky.

Done, also put it in the comments section on every article there (Subject to approval).

I cannot see them being approved as they don't show the image of utd that sky are trying to portray.

Probably not, but worth a try.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:18 pm**

I think any rational person realises that, but the rag mongs will just come out with some shit about them earning their money the right way.
That's the only argument the twats have got left.

Posted: **Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:35 pm**

sandman wrote:Starting 11 taken from Derby, transfer fee's taken from [url="http://transferleague.co.uk/"]http://transferleague.co.uk/[/url] Manchester United 01 de Gea - £18,900,000 02 Rafael - £2,500,000 03 Evra - £5,500,000 16 Carrick - £18,600,000 05 Ferdinand - £27,550,000 04 Jones - £17,000,000 23 Cleverley - Academy 31 Fellaini - £27,500,000 10 Rooney - £27,000,000 08 Mata - £37,100,000 19 Welbeck - Academy Total Spend - £181,650,000 Manchester City 01 Hart - £1,500,000 05 Zabaleta - £6,500,000 22 Clichy - £7,000,000 25 Fernandinho - £30,000,000 04 Kompany - £6,700,000 26 Demichelis - £3,500,000 15 Jesús Navas - £22,900,000 42 Yaya Touré - £24,000,000 10 Dzeko - £27,000,000 21 Silva - £25,000,000 08 Nasri - £22,000,000 Total Spend - £176,100,000

Haha. Excellent. Tell it to David Moyes as well!

The mancityfans.net football forum

Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's